Avatar
MA₿
16b8676587c1ddde60b23b27205112a4d5f0ce7bd0414f67476d5eea1502af36
⚡️✍🏽 55 Pleb 𝚂𝚆𝙴 𝚂𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝 Future ⒻⓄⓈⓈ Dev 𝔹𝕦𝕤𝕪 𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕦𝕟𝕚. ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕓𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕪 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕘.

If you close your eyes, I hear they just disappear.

I downloaded it months ago, but then it asked for me to make an account with email and password and I haven’t touched it since 😂

Absolutely beautiful song. Thanks for sharing. Adding it to my Bitcoin 2023 Conference playlist.

Let me get back to you on Monday with my decision on that.

Do you have a deadline that you’ll need to know? That really helps me 😂.

Replying to Avatar Rico

#[1]

Almost thinking 😂

Oh, no, I’ve had this opinion ever since ordinals and inscriptions became known to me during its first days. I’d like to see what other conferences would be more aligned with my values, but BTC Conference hosted by BM is the biggest unfortunately.

Like, I wouldn’t just waste the ticket by not attending or not selling. I’d sell it at a higher price to get my funds back + profit. I’ll need to bring a big cardboard sign like GuyWithASign.

Could you elaborate? I don’t want to misunderstand/misinterpret what you’re saying.

All I’m saying is that I’ve already paid for nearly everything to go to the conference, so it’d be annoying to cancel everything. I vote/support with my wallet, so if I don’t agree with something, I avoid buying it completely.

Replying to Avatar Callie

😩

Better to fail early 😅

Replying to Avatar The Nostr Report

🚨 🚨 Please check out this special Op-Ed by our valued contributor #[0]

——————————

NONCE POPULI

#[1]

Yesterday, #[2] announced the launch of “Bitcoin Magazine Historic Covers”, a 1/1 Ordinal NFT collection of its first 23 covers. These digital images of the covers, inscribed on the timechain, will be sold today (April 15th) via a Dutch auction. The choice of auction style is presumably to leverage partially signed bitcoin transactions (PSBT) that allow for a trust-minimized process which would not be possible with a traditional English auction.

The NFT auction is a disappointing decision by Bitcoin Magazine, in my opinion. While the winners will also receive a physical copy of the corresponding magazine, the auction itself is not explicitly for a physical object, but rather a digital representation of it.

The concerns a lot of Bitcoiners have about NFTs on other chains is that value is somehow being ascribed to an infinitely replicable digital object (and in many cases, just a hyperlink to the object). It takes a strong leap of faith to accept this premise, a leap that in my opinion is not compatible with the bitcoin philosophy of value stemming from a scarce, tamper-proof supply of the underlying asset.

Ordinals and inscriptions have brought the ability to do this on the bitcoin timechain. When we started the #gorillawarfare campaign on nostr in February, the motivation wasn’t to tell people what they can or cannot do on an open, free-speech protocol. The motivation was to appeal to their better judgement through good natured humor and memes and make them question what they *ought* and *ought not* do, despite having the ability to do so, on the greatest tool individuals have today to reclaim their sovereignty.

Segwit paved the way for blocks to effectively be 4MB in size. Most assumed that if there was a way to fill up all the blocks, they would be full. Inscriptions are certainly one way of filling up blocks, but so are monetary transactions that liberate users from the fiat system. The question is, which one should a major publication and arguably one of the most powerful voices in the space be promoting?

I would like to believe most of us bitcoiners have a shared mission to make the world a happier, more abundant and peaceful place. Empowering users to use bitcoin as a medium-of-exchange and driving adoption does that. Monke jpegs don’t.

I am appealing to the better judgement of my friends at Bitcoin Magazine to reconsider their decision to launch an NFT collection. Inscriptions are not a good use of blockspace in my opinion and are already attracting charlatans from the broader crypto world to peddle their scams on bitcoin. You have a responsibility to not encourage that.

With this news, I’m almost thinking about selling my Bitcoin 2023 Conference ticket. I’ve already finalized a lot of my plans to go, so it’d be a huge disruption to me deciding. Certainly, if they keep going down this path, I certainly won’t be going to the next conference.

In my opinion, Bitcoin Mag *should* be the guiding light to encourage the global MONETARY adoption, not monke jpegs. I’m not going through shitcoin decontamination just to see it all wind up on #Bitcoin. It’s like BM‘s history with VB as one of the founders is still relevant to today’s current company. With all the shit talking they’ve done about shitcoin No. 1, you’d think they’d be able to look in the mirror and see this.

The ones encouraging Ords/Ins keep saying “if the protocol permits it, too bad” and that’s not what I’m arguing against. I’m arguing that you should have some moral decency to not clog the network and increase fees for blatantly unnecessary garbage. Some things could (maybe) go on the chain, but they should be relevant, useful, free (because you can’t *own* a fucking inscription, scammers), lightweight, and possibly aid in sovereignty/freedom; at the very least, be clever. This is not an extensive list of qualifications, just my ramblings.

CC: #[3]​ #[1]​

#gorillawarfare

I can’t juggle at all, so doing that in conjunction with knocking out the opponent’s pins? Fuggataboutit.

Yeah, yeah, this is good.