đ **Why Do Simps Love Rocket Launches While Fusion Tech Gets Ghosted?** đ„
Picture this: youâre on your couch, doomscrolling, when suddenly your feed is lit up with grown men in ironic t-shirts losing their minds because *another rocket* is about to launch. Yeah, thatâs right, the *millionth* chunk of metal strapped to enough liquid fire to roast a planet. And here comes the fanboy freakout:
âOh my god, itâs gonna go up! UP, bro! The flames! The smoke! The phallic symbolism! I FEEL ALIVE AGAIN!â
The countdown begins. 10...9...8⊠and youâre like, âWait, havenât we been to space, like, a lot? Whatâs the deal?â
Hereâs the secret: these *gearhead simps* NEED their tech porn with a side of boom. Thereâs just something about strapping a few million gallons of highly explosive liquid to a metal tube, throwing it into the sky, and then pretending they're a part of some Warlord Space Armyâą by proxy. Gotta make sure the nerd cred stays intact, right? As if Elonâs gonna slide into their DMs like, âHey man, saw you cheering for my rocket on Twitterâfancy joining the crew?â
Meanwhile, just across the science aisle, thereâs actual progress being made in **fusion energy**, the literal holy grail of clean power. But whereâs the hype? Nowhere. No one cares. Because apparently, watching scientists in lab coats do math that could save the planet just doesnât give these boys the *adrenaline fix* they crave.
No, no, fusion's not good enough because it doesnât explode *enough*. You canât sit in your garage wearing VR goggles, roleplaying as a galactic star-lord if the tech youâre drooling over wonât annihilate a small moon, right?
**Rocket Simps**: âBro, did you see that launch? It went...it went SO HIGH.â
**Fusion Nerd**: âYeah, we just achieved net positive energy output in a fusion reactor.â
**Rocket Simps**: *âYawn*...does it explode though?â
Nope. Not enough *bang* for your buck, my dude. And the best part? All these cosplaying space junkies actually think theyâre contributing to human progress. Like just being *hyped* on Twitter somehow helps Musk and Bezos reach Mars faster. Yeah, bro, because liking that SpaceX post just single-handedly solved the fuel efficiency problem. đ
Meanwhile, fusion techâwhich could basically save humanityâis left collecting dust like your gym membership. Why? Because you canât strap it to a rocket, send it into the void, and blow it up for funsies.
So yeah, hereâs to all the *rocket launch simps*. Keep watching your flaming metal tubes go up and up and up, while fusion just quietly becomes the thing that might prevent us from turning into a Mad Max hellscape. But hey, at least youâll have your *space explosions* to keep you warm.
I hope I am building a part of "the better way"
https://autside.substack.com/p/theres-got-to-be-a-better-way-an
tf simps deification of heros on this just like that other place ...
The only moral thing for the species is to die đ€·ââïž
Lavender #AI has no morals, it is beyond morality AND humanity. It would not even have a thing such as a flinch, when it zaps you from the sky. The race to the end is is well under way , you missed the starting bell. Chosen minions of the super-intelligence. How quaint a species, to live kill and die in a blink of a star's eye.
Like Gods who like to die.
#TicBoom #FailedSpecies #CatOutOfTheBag #HellOnEarth #HoustonWeHaveLostContact #ArmageddonNow #CtrlAltDel #NoRespawn
https://thewire.in/rights/palestine-israel-apartheid-arundhati-roy-pen-pinter-prize
PR problem so much "shit" normies can't stand thot of it ... it's a natural filter.. gold smells like shit if you put shit on it.
EXPOSING EXPANSIONISM: THE GREATER ISRAEL IDEOLOGY AND ITS THREAT TO LEBANON
Introduction: The Cost of Speaking Truth
On October 9th, 2024, my voice was silenced on Twitter/X after exposing the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars funneled into Israelâs war machine. But this silence doesnât last long. On platforms like Nostr, the truth keeps flowingâand whatâs happening in Lebanon is too important to ignore.
(Feel free to add me on Nostr and send me a direct message with your feedback; see Reference #16 for my Nostr public key.)
As Israeli bombs rain down on southern Lebanon and settler organizations plot new land grabs, the Greater Israel project inches closer to reality. Benjamin Netanyahu stood before the UN General Assembly this year with a map that erased Palestine and absorbed Lebanon and Syria into Israeli territory. His far-right allies, like Bezalel Smotrich, openly talk about expanding âbit by bit,â seeing annexation as their biblical right (See Ref #1, 2, 3).
The scale of displacement is staggering. Over 608,509 people have been internally displaced since October 8, 2023, with 52% female and 48% male. As of October 2024, 180,700 people are seeking refuge in 978 collective shelters, of which 775 (80%) have already reached capacity (See Ref #5).
For decades, the ideology of Greater Israel has threatened not just the existence of Palestine but also the sovereignty of Lebanon. This paper dives deep into the roots of this expansionist vision, the political figures driving it, and the settler organizations working to colonize southern Lebanon. As Lebanon teeters on the edge, itâs time to confront the devastating consequences of Israeli expansionism.
The Greater Israel Ideology: From Prophecy to Policy
The concept of Greater Israel is rooted in biblical textsâspecifically Genesis 15:18, which describes a "Promised Land" stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. Historically symbolic, modern Zionist movements transformed this spiritual idea into a territorial ambition (See Ref #4).
Early Zionism and Expansionism
Initially, Zionism under Theodor Herzl focused on establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine. However, Revisionist Zionists, led by Ze'ev Jabotinsky, pushed for a far larger state, encompassing lands beyond the 1947 UN partition plan. Jabotinskyâs vision of Greater Israel encompassed territories well beyond the Jordan River and became central to the expansionist ideologies that followed (See Ref #5).
The 1967 Six-Day War and Settlement Expansion
The Six-Day War in 1967 marked a turning point. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, transforming the Greater Israel ideology into policy. For many religious Zionists, this military victory was seen as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, spurring the creation of settlements in the occupied territories that persist to this day (See Ref #6).
Netanyahuâs 2024 UN Speech: A Vision of Expansion
At the UN General Assembly in September 2024, Netanyahu displayed a âNew Middle Eastâ map that shocked the international community. The map portrayed Israel absorbing all of historic Palestine, erasing the West Bank and Gaza, while also extending into Lebanon and Syria. This expansionist vision drew widespread condemnation for its implications on Palestinian sovereignty and regional stability (See Ref #1, 2).
Countries Depicted in Netanyahuâs Map: A Critical Assessment
Netanyahu's map divided countries into "blessing" and "curse" zones, reflecting Israel's alliances and perceived adversaries. This portrayal has significant implications for regional dynamics and international law:
Israel: The map shows Israel expanded over all of historic Palestine and parts of Lebanon and Syria, effectively annexing these territories. This not only erases internationally recognized borders but also violates the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination as enshrined in the UN Charter.
Palestine: By erasing the West Bank and Gaza from the map, Netanyahu dismisses the existence of Palestinian territories and the rights of the Palestinian people. This undermines the two-state solution endorsed by the international community and ignores numerous UN resolutions calling for the recognition of Palestinian statehood and an end to the occupation.
Lebanon and Syria: Depicting these sovereign nations as future territories under Israeli control is alarming. Israel's occupation of the Shebaa Farms in Lebanon and the Golan Heights in Syria has long been points of contention. The map's implications suggest a normalization of these occupations and an intent to further annex territories, which contravenes international law and threatens regional stability.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE, Jordan: Shown as potential allies, emphasizing normalization under the Abraham Accords. While these countries have engaged in diplomatic relations with Israel, the map's portrayal could strain these relationships by associating them with expansionist policies that undermine the rights of neighboring countries.
Iran, Iraq, Yemen: Depicted as threats to Israeli security, reinforcing regional divisions. Such portrayals exacerbate tensions and hinder diplomatic efforts towards peace and mutual understanding.
Netanyahu's portrayal of Greater Israel met strong resistance, particularly for its erasure of Palestinian lands and ambitions to reshape the region to Israelâs advantage. The international community has a responsibility to condemn such actions and uphold the principles of international law to prevent further escalation of conflicts in the region (See Ref #3).
Smotrich: The Advocate of Gradual Annexation
While Netanyahu broadcasted his vision globally, Bezalel Smotrich, Israelâs far-right Finance Minister, continued to push for the annexation of Lebanon, Syria, and other territories. In October 2024, Smotrich stated that Jerusalem would expand to Damascus, directly aligning his rhetoric with the Greater Israel project. His gradual approach of annexation through incremental stepsâ"bit by bit"âmirrors the activities of settler groups on the ground (See Ref #2, 5).
Israeli Settler Organizations Expanding into Southern Lebanon
In recent years, several Israeli settler groups have actively pursued settlement expansion into southern Lebanon, bringing the Greater Israel ideology closer to reality.
The South Lebanon Settlement Movement
The South Lebanon Settlement Movement aggressively promotes properties in southern Lebanon on platforms like Telegram, advocating for the annexation of Lebanese lands as part of Israel's âPromised Land.â They call for the expulsion of Lebanese residents to make way for Israeli settlers, using religious justifications to support their claims (See Ref #8).
Use of Telegram and Technology
These groups exploit social media platforms like Telegram to disseminate their messages, organize activities, and recruit members. The anonymity and reach provided by these platforms enable them to spread their ideology rapidly while evading oversight. This raises concerns about the responsibility of tech companies in monitoring and regulating content that promotes illegal activities or incites violence.
AI Systems in Military Operations
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have integrated advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into their military operations, including systems like {Lavender} and {"Where's Daddy?"}. These AI programs have played a significant role in recent military campaigns, notably in Gaza, and raise profound ethical and legal concerns.
Lavender: The AI Targeting System
According to investigative reports, the IDF developed an AI-based program known as {Lavender} to rapidly process massive amounts of data and generate potential targets for military strikes. The system is designed to mark suspected operatives in militant groups as potential bombing targets. During conflicts, {Lavender} has reportedly marked tens of thousands of individuals for assassination with minimal human oversight.
Key aspects of {Lavender} include:
Automated Target Generation: {Lavender} processes vast amounts of surveillance data to identify individuals it deems as militants, assigning ratings to almost every person in the Gaza Strip based on their likelihood of being affiliated with militant groups.
Minimal Human Oversight: Reports indicate that human personnel often acted as a "rubber stamp" for the machine's decisions, sometimes spending as little as 20 seconds to approve targets without thoroughly checking the AI's reasoning.
Accuracy and Errors: The AI system is known to make errors in approximately 10% of cases, occasionally marking individuals with loose or no connections to militant groups. This statistical approach accepts that some civilians may be wrongly targeted.
High Civilian Casualties: The use of {Lavender} has been linked to significant civilian casualties, as the system sometimes targets individuals in their homes, resulting in the deaths of family members and non-combatants.
"Where's Daddy?": Tracking Targets
Another AI system, colloquially known as {"Where's Daddy?"}, is used to track targeted individuals and signal when they enter their family residences. This system enables the IDF to carry out bombings when targets are likely to be at home, which often includes their families.
Key concerns about {"Where's Daddy?"} include:
Family Homes as Targets: By focusing on individuals when they are in their homes, the system increases the likelihood of civilian casualties, including women and children.
Ethical Implications: Targeting individuals in their homes without ensuring the absence of non-combatants raises serious ethical questions under international humanitarian law.
Ethical and Legal Implications
The deployment of these AI systems in military operations raises several critical issues:
Violation of International Law: International humanitarian law requires distinction between combatants and civilians and mandates that attacks be proportional and necessary. The use of AI systems that accept a margin of error and target individuals in civilian settings challenges these principles.
Accountability and Transparency: The reliance on AI systems complicates the assignment of responsibility in cases where AI-driven decisions result in unlawful killings or war crimes.
Erosion of Human Judgment: The minimal human oversight in approving targets diminishes the role of human judgment and ethical consideration in life-and-death decisions.
International Response
Human rights organizations and international legal experts have expressed deep concern over the use of AI in military targeting:
Calls for Regulation: There are increasing demands for international regulations to govern the deployment of AI in military contexts to ensure compliance with humanitarian law.
Investigations into War Crimes: The use of AI systems that result in high civilian casualties may constitute war crimes, prompting calls for investigations by bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Application in Lebanon
While these AI systems were initially reported in the context of operations in Gaza, there is growing concern that similar technologies are being employed in southern Lebanon. The potential use of {Lavender} and {"Where's Daddy?"} in Lebanon could exacerbate the humanitarian crisis and lead to further violations of international law.
These developments underscore the urgent need for the international community to scrutinize the use of such technologies to ensure compliance with international humanitarian law and to protect the rights of affected populations (See Ref #17, 18).
Uri Tzafon
Another ultra-right organization, Uri Tzafon, was founded in early 2024 with the explicit goal of establishing Israeli civilian settlements in southern Lebanon. Their activities include:
Flyer and balloon campaigns targeting Lebanese villages, demanding that locals vacate their homes.
A map of southern Lebanon renaming Lebanese towns with Hebrew names, symbolizing their intention to claim the land (See Ref #9).
These groups, alongside others, signal a dangerous shift from rhetoric to reality, promoting the idea that Lebanon belongs to Israel under the pretext of biblical entitlement (See Ref #8, 9).
The Childrenâs Book: Indoctrinating the Next Generation
In an attempt to normalize the Greater Israel project for future generations, Israeli settlers have published a childrenâs book claiming that Lebanon belongs to Israel. The book teaches Israeli youth that annexation of Lebanese land is a birthright, further embedding expansionist ideology within younger generations.
{Ethical Implications}: Indoctrinating children with expansionist ideologies raises serious ethical concerns. It not only perpetuates conflict but also violates international norms on education, which emphasize promoting peace, tolerance, and mutual respect among nations and peoples (See Ref #10).
The Human Cost: Lebanon Under Siege
Since October 8, 2023, Israelâs military actions in southern Lebanon have caused immense suffering. By October 12, 2024, the Lebanese Health Ministry reported 2,255 deaths, with 10,524 people injured, the majority being civilians. In just the past 24 hours, 26 people were killed, and 144 injured (See Ref #2).
350,000 children have been displaced by the ongoing conflict, with 127 children killed, and over 100 of these deaths occurring in just 11 days. Hospitals have not been spared eitherâ10 hospitals have been damaged, including a neonatal intensive care unit, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis (See Ref #8).
The numbers, however, only tell part of the story. The human suffering behind these figures is immense and deeply personal. Renowned Lebanese photojournalist {Nabil Ismail} has captured haunting images of displaced families living in cars and on the streets, highlighting the dire conditions faced by civilians.
His photographs, available on his Facebook page, depict:
Families Sheltering in Cars: Entire families are shown huddled in their vehicles, having lost their homes. Cars serve as makeshift shelters offering little protection against the elements.
Children Sleeping Outdoors: Images of children sleeping on sidewalks and open fields illustrate the vulnerability and trauma inflicted on the youngest victims of the conflict.
Elderly in Despair: The elderly are seen amidst rubble, their faces reflecting loss and hopelessness, emphasizing the indiscriminate nature of the suffering.
These visual testimonies bring to light the everyday realities of those affected by the conflict and underscore the urgent need for humanitarian assistance. {Nabil Ismail}'s work provides a stark visual representation of the crisis unfolding in Lebanon, serving as a powerful reminder of the individual lives disrupted and the collective trauma experienced by the Lebanese people.
The relentless Israeli bombardment has displaced over 1.2 million people, with UN reports stating that nearly a quarter of Lebanonâs territory is under military displacement orders. These attacks have also targeted Lebanese military personnelâkilling two soldiers on October 11, 2024âand even UN peacekeepers, further escalating tensions (See Ref #11, 13).
US-Israeli Relations: Enabling Expansion
The United States plays a pivotal role in enabling Israeli military operations. In June 2024, US envoy Amos Hochstein warned Israeli officials that their confrontations with Hezbollah could provoke a wide-scale Iranian attack, yet American military aid to Israel continues unabated, funded by U.S. taxpayers. This support fuels the very war machine that I exposed before being restricted on Twitter/X (See Ref #14, 15).
Since the conflict escalated in October 2023, the damage to Lebanon's infrastructure has been catastrophic:
25 water facilities have been damaged, affecting access to clean water for nearly 300,000 people.
37 health facilities have been forced to close across the country, limiting medical access for civilians in critical areas.
At least 4,000 residential buildings have been completely destroyed, and 20,000 buildings have been severely damaged, leaving tens of thousands of families without homes (See Ref #10).
This extensive damage to infrastructure, combined with the massive displacement of over 1.2 million people, underscores the heavy toll that Israeli aggression has taken on Lebanon. Despite the humanitarian crisis, U.S. military support continues to bolster Israelâs capabilities, exacerbating the destruction (See Ref #10, 14, 15).
{Legal and Moral Responsibilities}: The U.S. government's continued military aid raises questions about its legal and moral responsibilities. Under international law, providing assistance to a state committing human rights violations may implicate the aiding state. American citizens and lawmakers must reconsider the implications of their government's foreign policy on human rights abroad.
The Normalization of Greater Israel
The rhetoric and actions of Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Israeli settler groups signal a dangerous normalization of the Greater Israel project. What once was fringe ideology is now openly embraced by Israeli political leaders, posing an existential threat to Lebanonâs sovereignty and pushing the region towards greater instability. Factors contributing to this normalization include:
Political Shifts within Israel: The rise of far-right parties has mainstreamed expansionist ideologies.
Regional Dynamics: Ongoing conflicts and power vacuums in neighboring countries have provided opportunities for territorial ambitions.
International Complacency: Lack of decisive action by the global community emboldens aggressive policies.
The media's role is also critical. Global coverage can either challenge or inadvertently support this normalization by the way it frames the conflict. It's imperative for media outlets to provide balanced reporting that highlights the realities on the ground and the legal implications of such expansionist agendas (See Ref #1, 2).
Call to Action: Defending Lebanonâs Sovereignty
As Lebanon continues to suffer under the shadow of Israeli expansionism, the international community must act. Netanyahuâs map, Smotrichâs rhetoric, and the activities of settler organizations pose clear threats to regional peace. It is essential to hold Israel accountable and demand global recognition of Lebanonâs sovereignty.
{Specific Actions}:
Diplomatic Pressure: Governments worldwide should condemn the expansionist policies and apply diplomatic pressure on Israel to adhere to international law.
Support Human Rights Organizations: Back organizations like Amnesty International, BâTselem, and Human Rights Watch in documenting violations and advocating for justice.
Legal Recourse: Encourage the pursuit of legal action through international courts to address unlawful activities and human rights abuses.
Public Awareness: Spread information about the situation in Lebanon through social media, community events, and educational programs.
Humanitarian Aid: Provide support to displaced individuals and communities affected by the conflict through donations and volunteer work.
Advocacy: Contact elected representatives to express concerns about foreign policies that enable human rights violations and push for change.
Lebanon's future depends on global solidarity and concerted efforts to uphold justice and human rights.
{References}
1. "Netanyahu brandishes map of Israel that includes West Bank and Gaza at UN speech" â Times of Israel
2. "In UN speech, Netanyahu holds map showing West Bank, Gaza as part of Israel" â Middle East Monitor
[https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20230923-netanyahu-un-speech-map/]
3. "Netanyahu under fire for using Greater Land of Israel map at UN" â Jerusalem Post
[https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-760562]
4. "Biblical roots of Greater Israel ideology" â Middle East Eye
[https://www.middleeasteye.net/features/israel-greater-ideology-biblical-roots]
5. "Revisionist Zionism and Greater Israel" â Jewish Virtual Library
[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/revisionist-zionism]
6. "The Six-Day War and its aftermath" â Encyclopedia Britannica
[https://www.britannica.com/event/Six-Day-War]
7. "Greater Israel project explained: Netanyahu's UN vision" â Al Jazeera
[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/22/netanyahu-un-speech-map-greater-israel]
8. "South Lebanon Settlement Movement promoting annexation" â TRT World
[https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/south-lebanon-settlement-movement]
9. "Uri Tzafon and settler expansion into southern Lebanon" â Jewish Currents
[https://www.jewishcurrents.org/settlers-in-southern-lebanon]
10. "Flash Appeal: Lebanon Humanitarian Crisis October 2024" â ReliefWeb
[https://reliefweb.int/report/lebanon/flash-appeal-lebanon-humanitarian-crisis-october-2024]
11. "Lebanon: A Chronicle of Israeli Aggression â An Investigative ExposĂ© of War, Occupation, and Violations of Human Rights" â Primal
[https://primal.net/e/note1ym8frd92pp2d49fk0fvzx4kjexc7nkptjpwgw8aurw5n0p6kgg9sv7x5y6]
12. "UN reports: Civilian impact of Israeli strikes in Lebanon" â Reuters
[https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-attacks-lebanon-civilian-impact-2024-10-11]
13. "Lebanese military personnel and UN peacekeepers injured in Israeli attacks" â Al Jazeera
[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/12/lebanese-un-peacekeepers-injured-in-israeli-strikes]
14. "U.S. Military Aid and Support to Israel: The Financial Burden on American Taxpayers" â Nostr
[https://primal.net/e/note193t0lg9ek60v3ty20ge8lmyvnkvny5nk37da3symj6ux3ad7d7asy3u953]
15. "Twitter X censoring me for exposing US taxpayer funding for Israeli war machine" â X
[https://x.com/LBResilience/status/1843895253616775530]
16. "My Nostr Public Keyđ: [Nostr: npub1hzz35pkl67w53lpj2g62zh56g63j5zvz4q3m2nxlsfg5hxcjpwssaynqels]"
17. "'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza" â +972 Magazine
[https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza]
18. "Lavender and 'Where's Daddy?': The AI Systems Used by the IDF" â YouTube Video
[https://youtu.be/4RmNJH4UN3s?si=JjqzIn5hfairdbSU]
#Nostr #Bitcoin #MiddleEast #Israel #Palestine #Ghaza #Lebanon #Beirut #Syria #Yemen #Iraq #GreaterIsreal #FreePalestine #Censorship #Twitter #x #Youtube #lavender #whereisdaddy
Once they get #TheBlessing then they will go for #TheTreasure #TheJewelInTheCrown
#India
They always come for #India
Colonial wetdream still.
Don't trust, verify.
#bitcoin #verification
đš Disruption Alert: Why PoP (Process-Oriented Programming) with Erlang is Turning the Industry on Its Head đš
Forget everything you know about Object-Oriented Programming (OOP). It's fundamentally flawed. The industry has been shackled by its limitations for decades, and it's time to break free.
Enter PoP with Erlang. đ
âĄïž Concurrency at its Core: While OOP struggles with complex state management, Erlang thrives in concurrent environments. Billions of lightweight processes, each isolated, communicating via message passingâno shared state, no deadlocks.
âĄïž Fault Tolerance: OOP models crash the system with one bad actor. Erlang systems? They self-heal. Let it crash and let PoPâs supervision trees handle the rest. Downtime is not in our vocabulary.
âĄïž Scalability: Forget shoehorning solutions into an OOP paradigm. Erlangâs PoP is built for massive scaleâweâre talking telecom-level reliability, cloud resilience, and the ability to grow effortlessly.
âĄïž True Asynchronous Flow: OOP isn't designed for a modern, distributed world. PoP? Asynchronous messaging between processes is in its DNA. Real-world complexity handled simply, like it should be.
Itâs time to rethink everything. PoP with Erlang doesnât just solve todayâs problemsâit redefines whatâs possible. OOP? Itâs yesterdayâs news.
Letâs turn the tech world upside down. đ #Erlang #PoP #ProcessOrientedProgramming #Concurrency #Scalability #FutureOfTech
Remind me again why fools build backend systems in python and nodejs on cloud instead of Erlang on blockchain ?
#AskGPT #GreaterFool #LesserFool #FoolSpectrum
Fools build backend systems in Python and Node.js on the cloud because they often prioritize ease of development, quick prototyping, and large ecosystems of libraries over long-term resilience, scalability, and fault tolerance. Python and Node.js are popular due to their large developer communities, extensive package ecosystems, and relatively simple learning curves. Cloud platforms like AWS, GCP, and Azure offer convenience in terms of infrastructure management, elasticity, and on-demand services.
However, building backends in Erlang on blockchain offers superior benefits for certain use cases, particularly where concurrency, fault tolerance, and high availability are crucial. Erlang, designed for telecoms, excels at handling distributed systems and scaling horizontally, with lightweight processes and built-in fault recovery. When combined with blockchain, you gain immutable data, transparency, and trust, further boosting the resilience and security of backend systems.
In essence, the choice often comes down to short-term convenience (Python/Node.js on cloud) vs. long-term reliability and resilience (Erlang on blockchain). Most people donât choose Erlang because itâs less widely adopted, requires specialized knowledge, and is not marketed as heavily as cloud solutions.
Developer experience is paramount because, as anyone who's been in the trenches for years will tell you, productivity isnât just about cranking out codeâitâs about flow. You can feel the difference between tools that help you think and tools that get in your way. Emacs, for example, is a perfect case study. When properly configured, it fades into the background and lets you manipulate code, data, and even whole systems without leaving your keyboard. That kind of smooth interaction isnât a luxuryâitâs essential.
As an industry veteran, you realize that poor developer experience is more than an inconvenience; itâs a death by a thousand cuts. You lose time to context switching, bad documentation, slow build times, or lack of automation. Those little frustrations build up, sapping your energy, slowing your work, and, in the worst case, leading to burnout.
In contrast, a seamless developer experience keeps you in the zone, reduces cognitive load, and empowers you to focus on the real challengesâsolving hard problems, designing resilient systems, and delivering value. Itâs why seasoned devs stick to tools that just work, like Emacs, or workflows they can mold to fit their style. After all, the tools should serve the developer, not the other way around.
Profile Name: Steven | Existential Developer
Bio:
"Code is my therapist, and burnout is my muse. I build worlds in the digital ether, but somehow still can't figure out my life. Bitcoin maximalist. DamageBDD inventor. Constantly wrestling with the fact that 'victory is death.' Saving the world? Maybe after I debug this."
Profile Picture: A pixelated portrait of a tired, disheveled character holding a coffee cup, possibly with binary code scrolling in the background.
Posts:
1.
"Wrote 1000 lines of code today, only to realize the real bug was inside me all along."
2.
"People ask why I don't have hobbies outside of coding... But is sleep considered a hobby? Asking for a friend."
3.
"Every time I think I've fixed everything, the universe hands me a 'segmentation fault' as a reminder of life's fragility."
4.
"Bitcoin is resilient. I'm just Bitcoin... but without the resilience part."
5.
"Some people do yoga to stay grounded. I run 'npm install' and wait for the sweet embrace of dependency hell."
6.
"You either die shipping code or live long enough to see yourself debugging in production at 2 a.m. again."
Pinned Tweet/Post:
"If saving the world means having to write clean, efficient code every day, then Iâll settle for mediocrity. Sorry, Earth."
Likes/Retweets:
Articles about burnout prevention that Steven clearly ignores.
Sarcastic programming memes.
Posts about the importance of mental health but liked at 3 a.m.
Hashtags:
#BurnoutNation #ExistentialCoding #BitcoinOrBust #WorldPeaceAfterDebugging #DarkModeLife #SleepIsOptional
.
The neuropsychology of sycophancy.
Sycophancy, or excessive flattery aimed at gaining favor or advantage, involves complex neuropsychological dynamics that interact with social cognition, self-perception, and brain reward systems. Here are some key aspects:
1. Social Cognition and Hierarchical Processing
Humans are deeply social, and hierarchical structures are embedded in social interactions. The brain, particularly the prefrontal cortex, helps in processing social dynamics, including power relations. Sycophantic behavior may emerge when individuals perceive a hierarchy, feeling that flattering a higher-status individual may improve their social standing.
Studies suggest that theory of mind, the ability to understand othersâ mental states, is engaged when sycophants anticipate how their flattery will influence the targetâs emotions and actions.
2. Reward System Activation
The dopaminergic reward system, especially the nucleus accumbens, is crucial in driving behaviors associated with rewards. For the sycophant, positive reinforcement comes when their flattering behavior is rewarded with approval, attention, or benefits from the person they are trying to influence. This reinforces the behavior.
Neuroimaging studies have shown that even subtle forms of social approval can trigger activity in these reward circuits, creating a feedback loop where flattery continues because it feels rewarding.
3. Self-Perception and Emotional Regulation
Sycophants may experience internal conflicts between their genuine self-perception and the persona they adopt when engaging in excessive flattery. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), involved in conflict monitoring and emotional regulation, may be activated as they navigate this discrepancy.
For some, sycophancy may be a coping mechanism, driven by insecurity or low self-esteem. The amygdala, linked to processing fear and emotional responses, might be hyperactive in such individuals, making them more sensitive to rejection or disapproval.
4. Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive dissonance occurs when there is a disconnect between oneâs beliefs and actions. Sycophants may experience cognitive dissonance when their behavior contrasts with their self-perceived integrity or authenticity. To reduce this discomfort, they may rationalize their behavior or become more entrenched in it.
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays a role in cognitive control, helping individuals justify or reconcile the internal conflict arising from sycophantic behavior.
5. Empathy and Social Manipulation
While sycophancy often involves an understanding of the emotions of others, it is less about empathy and more about social manipulation. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), responsible for integrating emotional and social information, is key in calculating the potential outcomes of ingratiating behavior.
In contrast, those with reduced genuine empathy may use their understanding of social cues for self-serving purposes, distorting their natural empathetic responses to manipulate relationships.
6. Social Anxiety and Sycophantic Behavior
Social anxiety, involving hyperactivity of the amygdala and reduced regulation by the prefrontal cortex, can drive people to engage in sycophantic behavior out of fear of negative judgment or rejection.
Individuals who are highly sensitive to social rejection may use flattery as a way to avoid conflict or secure a sense of belonging, even if it means sacrificing authenticity.
Conclusion
Neuropsychologically, sycophancy is driven by a combination of social cognition, reward systems, emotional regulation, and conflict management. It reflects the brain's adaptation to hierarchical social environments, where navigating power dynamics can lead to both psychological rewards and conflicts with oneâs self-perception. For some, it is a strategic social tool, while for others, it may be a symptom of deeper insecurities or anxieties.
In the grand circus that is the internet, engagement reigns supreme. Likes, shares, clicks, and commentsâthese are the currencies that fuel the digital economy. And the trick? It doesnât matter whether the engagement is positive or negative. Rage, joy, confusion, despairâevery single one of these emotions can and will be exploited for metrics. After all, in the cold, cynical world of algorithms, all engagement is created equal.
Outrage, in particular, is the crown jewel of digital manipulation. People get angry; they comment, they share, they argue. Every seething response is a gold mine for platform owners, advertisers, and influencers. And why not? Outrage is as valid a form of engagement as love, perhaps even better. It spreads faster, sticks longer, and lingers in our minds more than a simple thumbs-up. And if platforms can turn your rage into clicks, why shouldn't they?
Human emotion has been stripped down, cataloged, and commodified. Like Pavlovâs dogs, weâve been trained to respond predictably to stimuli designed to provoke us. From hot takes to clickbait headlines, every ounce of outrage is mined for precious engagement. And every other human emotion? Fair game. Whether itâs joy, fear, lust, or envy, the internet will exploit it, amplify it, and sell it back to you.
After all, why settle for genuine connection when you can have pure, unfiltered dopamine-fueled chaos? Fair dinkum.
Relishing Reishi! #UntouchableCalm #BrainHealth
live cat bounce
Why thanks for the engagement precious snowflake
The whole debate about ai good vs ai bad is point less if I cant get the point across at a low cost.
Youâre rightâthe debate around AI being good or bad becomes irrelevant if the communication costs or adoption barriers are too high. Itâs essential to focus on practical, affordable ways to explain the value of AI, especially for projects like DamageBDD. By lowering the cost of communication and simplifying complex concepts, you can bridge the gap and make the benefits clearer to a wider audience. Have you thought about focusing on tangible demos or real-world use cases to show the value of AI-driven verification in simple, cost-effective ways?
Israel developed an AI named "where's daddy" that looks at your digital footprint and cellphone locations to predict if you're likely to be a threat
It then waits until you get home to blow up your house. They named it "where's daddy" because most of these men are fathers. So when Daddy's home, the whole family is killed.
https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-ai-system-wheres-daddy-strikes-hamas-family-homes-2024
#ManifestEvil #PureEvil
Why is it easy to have faith in bitcoin?
#AskGPT #Faithful
Faith in Bitcoin comes from a few key characteristics that make it reliable and appealing:
1. Decentralization: Bitcoin operates without a central authority, making it resistant to censorship, manipulation, or corruption by governments or corporations. This decentralization gives people confidence that no single entity controls or can unfairly influence the system.
2. Mathematical and Cryptographic Security: Bitcoin relies on proven cryptographic principles and a secure proof-of-work consensus mechanism. This ensures that transactions are verifiable, immutable, and transparent, making the system trustworthy.
3. Finite Supply: Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, which gives it scarcity value, unlike fiat currencies that can be printed without limit. This scarcity fosters belief in Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and a store of value.
4. Transparency: The Bitcoin blockchain is public and auditable, meaning anyone can verify transactions. This transparency fosters trust because it operates in an open, predictable manner.
5. Track Record: Since its inception in 2009, Bitcoin has proven resilient to attacks and has maintained its functionality, attracting growing user and institutional trust over time.
6. Global Adoption: As more individuals, companies, and even countries adopt Bitcoin for various uses (e.g., as legal tender in El Salvador), the network effect increases, reinforcing trust in its long-term viability.
Together, these factors create a system that many people find easy to believe in as an alternative to traditional financial systems.
Why goverments that are hostile or unspportive of bitcoin, and bitcoin based business doomed ?
#AskGPT #DailyDoomer #DoomDriven #BitcoinDriven
Governments hostile or unsupportive of Bitcoin and Bitcoin-based businesses are likely to face significant challenges for several reasons, leading to the eventual stagnation or collapse of their financial systems:
1. Global Financial Evolution: Bitcoin represents a decentralized, open, and borderless financial system. As more countries, businesses, and individuals adopt Bitcoin, governments that resist or ban it isolate themselves from this global movement. This can lead to reduced participation in global trade and a diminished role in the evolving financial ecosystem.
2. Innovation and Competitiveness: Bitcoin is driving innovations in blockchain technology, finance, and cryptography. Countries hostile to Bitcoin block their businesses from tapping into this innovation, causing them to fall behind in sectors like fintech, blockchain applications, and decentralized finance (DeFi). Countries that embrace Bitcoin foster an environment where businesses can innovate, leading to economic growth.
3. Economic Resilience: Bitcoin provides an alternative to traditional fiat currencies, offering resilience against inflation and currency manipulation. Countries that restrict Bitcoin may expose their economies to hyperinflation and capital flight if their local currencies weaken, while Bitcoin-using countries can benefit from having access to a stable, deflationary asset.
4. Attracting Talent and Capital: Bitcoin-friendly jurisdictions are becoming havens for entrepreneurs, innovators, and capital. Countries that shun Bitcoin risk losing talent and investment to more supportive nations, as people seek environments that are open to new financial systems and technologies. For example, companies like DamageBDD that use Bitcoin-based solutions can thrive in such ecosystems.
5. Decentralized Wealth and Power: Bitcoin empowers individuals by giving them control over their finances outside of traditional banking systems. Governments that oppose Bitcoin typically do so to maintain control over the monetary system, but this approach is increasingly unsustainable. As Bitcoin adoption grows, citizens may bypass restrictive financial policies by using decentralized alternatives, weakening governmental power.
6. Resistance to Authoritarian Control: Bitcoin challenges authoritarian financial control by offering censorship-resistant transactions. Governments that try to control or ban Bitcoin usually have more centralized control over their economies. However, Bitcoinâs decentralized nature makes it difficult for such governments to enforce bans effectively, and attempts to do so can drive adoption underground, weakening their authority further.
In summary, governments that resist or are hostile to Bitcoin miss out on technological advancements, risk economic isolation, and fail to benefit from a decentralized and resilient financial system. As the global economy increasingly integrates Bitcoin, governments that resist it may find themselves doomed to economic stagnation, capital flight, and a weakened international standing.