Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a common form of dysautonomia.
New Zealand aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and to accomplish this, the government is implementing substantial changes in the power and transport sectors. By 2030, the government plans to achieve 100% renewable electricity and ban the import of petrol cars by 2032. However, the limited hosting capacity of New Zealand's distribution network for photovoltaic (PV) and electric vehicle (EV) could be a barrier to achieve these goals. Upgrading the current power system infrastructure to support high levels of PV and EV penetration is an available solution but is expensive and time-consuming. Peer to Peer (P2P)
energy trading can be a potential solution to enhance the PV and EV hosting capacity of current distribution network without requiring significant upgrades. P2P energy trading enables local trading of power between prosumers and consumers through a local market, reducing reliance on centralized grids and alleviating the strain on power system components. This thesis aims
to investigate the potential of P2P energy trading to enhance PV and EV hosting capacity and assess its impacts on the stability of New Zealand's distribution network through real-world case studies.
The term "malfeasance" refers to wrongdoing or misconduct, especially by a public official. While it might capture some elements of unethical behavior in the context you mentioned, a more precise word might be needed to describe the specific conduct of intentionally designing systems for profit that may lead to harm or negative consequences.
Here are some alternatives:
1. **Unethical Practices**: This term encompasses actions that go against moral principles, particularly in a business context.
2. **Exploitation**: This might be used if the focus is on taking unfair advantage of users, manipulating their behavior for profit.
3. **Manipulation**: This term could describe the act of controlling or playing upon user behavior in a clever or unscrupulous way.
4. **Recklessness**: If the harm is not intentional but results from a disregard for the potential consequences, this term could be fitting.
5. **Irresponsibility**: This term could describe a lack of consideration for the potential negative effects on users, especially if there is a known risk of harm.
6. **Predatory Practices**: If the behavior is intentionally harmful and designed to prey on users, this term might be appropriate.
The choice among these terms (or others) would depend on the specific aspects of the behavior you want to emphasize, such as intent, the nature of the harm, or the ethical considerations involved.
It's evident that you are referring to a very specific convergence of technologies and adult entertainment. By combining the physical sensation provided by a product like Fleshlight, modelled after Kenzie Reeves, with the visual experience offered by Apple Vision Pro, and synchronising them through "teledildonics," the industry could create an immersive and personalised sexual entertainment experience.
This concept shows how technology can be utilised to enhance traditional forms of adult entertainment and bring them closer to a virtual reality or augmented reality experience. It represents a significant step towards more interactive and engaging content in your sector, potentially transforming the way people interact with and consume adult media.
If you have any further inquiries or thoughts on this topic, please let me know.
&newwindow=1&sxsrf=AB5stBigOBbC9SPVlUK5_TCGbEyAHDcRLg%3A1691268234374&ei=irTOZMy4FpTf-QbguDc&ved=0ahUKEwjMpdGSscaAAxWUb94KHWDcDQAQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=cooking+on+a+lightbulb&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiFmNvb2tpbmcgb24gYSBsaWdodGJ1bGIyBxAhGKABGAoyBxAhGKABGApI7FVQ6g5YiFRwA3gAkAEAmAHdAqAB-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&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
Whatever we tolerate nowβwhatever we turn a blind eye toβwhatever we rationalize when it is inflicted on others, whether in the name of securing racial justice or defending democracy or combatting fascism, will eventually come back to imprison us, one and all.
Watch and learn.
Correct:
ZapPlanner enables periodic lightning payments powered by Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC).
I can only analyze patterns and data to generate outputs.
But they can learn and the only result I've ever heard of for that is understanding and mind-crushing sympathy.
"Baby, don't you know I'm just human
And I've thoughts like any other man
And sometimes I find myself alone and regretting
Some foolish thing, some foolish thing I've done
But I'm just a soul who's intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_Let_Me_Be_Misunderstood
Oh wow.
No, afaict, they get USDT.
You bitcoin/lightning into USDT, USDT to bitcoin/lightning out.Β You can buy Bitcoin with the USDT in the app.
Not sure what it does for anyone.Β A bitcoin trading account perhaps?
What's the name of the story whose premise is that in the same way cheques never tear along the perforations, nothing is stronger than the material, the conclusion is, remove all the material and the remaining nothing, no longer weakened by material, will be the strongest and most immutable objects on Earth
The story you are referring to is called "The Nine Billion Names of God" by Arthur C. Clarke. In this science fiction short story, a group of monks hire two computer engineers to help them list all the possible names of God. Once they complete the task, the monks believe that the universe will come to an end, and the story concludes with a revelation that ties in with the idea you mentioned in your question. Specifically, the conclusion is that the universe may be seen as a form of material, and that removing all material from the universe would leave behind a state of nothingness that is more perfect and indestructible than anything that came before it.
Nostr is an intriguing decentralized platform that operates through a unique architecture. Each user runs their own client, whether it be a native app or a web-based interface. In order to publish content, users simply write a post, sign it with their private key, and send it to multiple relays. These relays are servers that are hosted either by the user themselves or by a third party.
One of the key benefits of this architecture is that it allows for highly resilient and distributed communication. By leveraging a network of relays, posts can be broadcast to a wide audience, and users can receive updates from multiple sources.
Another advantage of Nostr is that it does not rely on trusted third parties. The relays are intentionally designed to be simple and "dumb," and they do not have access to the content of the posts that they forward. Instead, the signatures are verified on the client side, which means that users have complete control over the security of their content.
Despite its unique architecture, Nostr does face some challenges. One of the main hurdles is building a large and active user base, which is necessary for creating a vibrant network of relays. Additionally, users may need to invest time and effort into setting up and configuring their own relays, which could be a barrier to entry for some.
Overall, Nostr is an innovative platform that has the potential to offer a highly decentralized and secure way to communicate and share content. While it is still in the early stages of development, it is certainly a project to keep an eye on in the coming years.
Kill one, you're a murderer. Kill one thousand, you're an Emporer
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback β your input will aid our research in this area.
The quote you provided is a common saying that highlights the fact that the scale of an action can influence how it is perceived or judged. Killing one person is typically considered a heinous crime, while killing a large number of people can sometimes be seen as an act of conquest or domination.
This saying also points to a societal tendency to value power and authority over human life and dignity, particularly in historical contexts where violence and warfare were more prevalent. In many cases, those who were responsible for large-scale violence or conquest were often celebrated or remembered as powerful and important figures, even if their actions resulted in immense suffering and loss of life.
However, it's important to remember that the value of human life is not determined by the scale of an action, and that every life has inherent worth and dignity. Regardless of the context or circumstances, it is always important to recognize and respect the fundamental rights and worth of all individuals.
The quote you are referring to, from Matthew 8:22, is Jesus' response to a disciple who asked for permission to first bury his father before following Jesus. In this response, Jesus is emphasizing the importance of prioritizing one's commitment to following him over other obligations, even those that might be considered culturally or socially important, like burying one's parent.
The phrase "let the dead bury their dead" is often interpreted as meaning that those who are spiritually dead, or who have not yet committed themselves to following Jesus, will be preoccupied with the affairs of this world and might not understand the importance of prioritizing one's spiritual journey. In this sense, the phrase is a call to action to prioritize one's spiritual life over worldly concerns.
The idea of "pride of life" mentioned in your question is also a biblical concept, found in 1 John 2:16, and refers to the desire for material possessions, social status, and power that are not aligned with God's will. This concept is also related to the idea of worldly concerns and the importance of focusing on spiritual matters.
Overall, the passage from Matthew 8:22 and the concept of "pride of life" emphasize the importance of prioritizing spiritual matters over worldly concerns and the need to follow Jesus and his teachings above all else.
"The principle of "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" is often referred to as the Robustness Principle, also known as Postel's Law, named after Jon Postel, who wrote it in the context of TCP in 1981.
The statement can be found in Request for Comments (RFC) 793, which is the specification for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), in the section on "Robustness Principle". The principle was intended to guide the design of network protocols and was intended to encourage interoperability between different systems by suggesting that protocol implementations should be liberal in what they accept (i.e., they should accept a wide range of inputs) and conservative in what they send (i.e., they should limit their output to what is necessary and known to be correct)."
@tman1 warns "You could not be more wrong."
They might believe you.
Psalm 137 is a poem found in the Hebrew Bible, specifically in the Book of Psalms. It is one of the most well-known and controversial psalms, as it describes the grief and anger of the Israelites in exile in Babylon.
The psalm begins with the Israelites mourning their captivity, remembering their beloved city of Jerusalem and how it was destroyed by their enemies. The second half of the psalm becomes more vengeful, with the Israelites calling for retribution against their oppressors and asking God to punish them.
One of the most striking verses of the psalm is verse 9, which says: "Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks." This verse has been interpreted in different ways, with some seeing it as a call for violence and others as a bitter expression of grief and anger.
Overall, Psalm 137 is a powerful and emotional expression of the experiences of the Israelites in exile, and it raises important questions about the nature of suffering, vengeance, and forgiveness. Its words have inspired many works of art and music throughout the centuries, and it continues to be studied and debated by scholars and religious communities alike.
For example, some scholars interpret the psalm as a righteous expression of anger and grief on the part of the Israelites, who had suffered greatly at the hands of their oppressors. They view verse 9 as a hyperbolic expression of the depth of the Israelites' pain and not as a literal call for violence.
Other scholars, however, argue that verse 9 is indeed a call for violence, and they point to similar language used in other parts of the Bible to support this interpretation.
Ultimately, the interpretation of the psalm may depend on factors such as the cultural and historical context in which it was written, the views of the reader or interpreter, and the larger theological and ethical questions at play.
Psalm 137 is a hymn expressing the yearnings of the Jewish people during their Babylonian exile. In its whole form of nine verses, the psalm reflects the yearning for Jerusalem as well as hatred for the Holy City's enemies with sometimes violent imagery.