nostr:npub1vxd0dfst8ljvwva2egrpc53ve8ru78v8aaxfpravchkexmfmmu3sqnrs50 I have autocomplete mentions on Primal desktop. But yes. Push is literally everything to a social app.

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED WHILE I WAS AT WORK. https://files.sovbit.host/media/44dc1c2db9c3fbd7bee9257eceb52be3cf8c40baf7b63f46e56b58a131c74f0b/6b16d32999a8648c2618e20f21d60f8503f843ee052800cad27093d78e25cbf3.webp
All the miners shut'r down after halving? 🤣
Time to sidestep was $74k when I first started warning about it. Confirmation of red scenario (if we get it), won't be until much lower.
The guidance lines on this chart haven't moved since I posted them in Mid-March. Yet look where we are.
The longer BTC fails to overtake ATH, the more likely $74k was the top. A 5-wave move off the highs would confirm the top, we're in W3 (or C) now. Resolution is nearing.
PS: Charts don't care about Bitcoin's halving.

Good point nostr:npub18cxqklkp83g2fv9mk7kgkag0lz4s7yacpk8ljm3sfx0agrx6320qruqz89. Decentralization is the limiter of speed. But even Litecoin has 2.5 minute block time. Not any more or less usable than BTC. But it is faster.
To me, usable has to be 4 sec or less. I'm testing and learning Nano now. It's always been of interest to me. Checks all the boxes, fixed supply (all mined up front), instant transactions.
I don't understand its mining/consensus yet. Maybe a dud. We'll see.
I think Bitcoin has a wakeup call. It can remain as "digital gold", slow, store of value. But that means people use something else for daily transactions.
Lightning, or another L1. To me, the usability difference between Lightning vs another good L1 is minimal. Risks, exchange time, costs. In fact Lightning probably fares worse at these.
So if a faster L1 protocol comes out with moderate security, capital will flow there for payments. But it may start accumulating there and avoiding going back to Bitcoin at all if/when that L1 protocol proves itself. Very likely scenario IMO.
Exactly nostr:npub180x9vv4yuagf2w3qzmuertvv46ccee6n0wp0yh3zcz7nhyqrmzuqzjmehq At the crux, you're arguing more volume, lower fees. To achieve the same income as less volume, higher fees.
Higher throughput. That benefits the network and users. Efficiency.
No you don't need to track UTXO's because UTXO's are stupid. Them and blockchain are the constraint of the whole system.
The distributed ledger is all that matters. You don't need to know "who sent what". You only need to know "who owns what". That's it. The ledger.
The logic is simple: Has key? Has balance? Send approved.
You're constrained to Bitcoin. I'm talking a fresh protocol.
They scale if you don't keep all transaction history back to inception. Anything longer than 30days isn't needed.
Beef the size, shrink the time, scrap the unneeded excess.
nostr:npub1rr7vzwv4p2wvu0lwtmj0far08clsuvuzwlwv30xkj2euur55pp8qr9wudh
#negr0art
Cerra un poco los ojos

Hey that's super cool! 👏
Ya I agree. The overwhelming Bitcoin worship echo chamber ruins it. Need more normal users.
I've fallen off Nostr for the same reason. Legacy social bans will keep trickling users over here though. Elon is marketing Nostr hard lately with his bans.
I know, I posted it just as a reference for others 🙂
Well, we don't have enough clues. So far that still leave us with so much combinations that it will be imposible to iterate trough all of them in our lifetimes.
But if we would know the length of each word or the length of just some words that would make deciphering more interesting.
Nothing truly changed except number of possible combinations dropped from 3 nonillion to 1 nonillion or from 604 words to 302 possible words
I'm curious what's nostr:npub10wcdqdy9950akm8vzxugg6pqma4x7w6flvfepzdf062fxny2un0qxah257 's method and how far he really came. Does he work with supercomputers?
So nostr:npub1mfndvgwstwm604jvrt07p6nyy898mdsdzzyumx9sdn8u6r4za4uqck6f8v posted "mother" as the 12th word, yet there's not even an "R" in his letter list.
This is disingenuous. I was under the impression his seed phrase was only 3 and 4 letter words, consisting of only the letters copied.
Not the first 3-4 letters of any length words.
This is impossible. He might as well not even have given letters. Total waste of time. I regret even engaging.
This was posted before any clue words were given. I see the words are not only 3 and 4 letter words as the poster originally claimed. So that changes everything.
Explain it for a 6yr old.
Build it for a 3yr old.
Too microscopic timeframe for my blood. haha GL man

