the average 18 year old in the united states is on pace to spend 93% of their free time looking at a screen
scrolling is an epidemic
https://blossom.primal.net/5b592bdac4d72e92e52c83e0f4c1dae715e15bb71d2b24edd078a7c406b04612.mp4
This is human fud bro. I refuse to let the millennials turn into another boomer generation.
If your kids are looking at slop on screens, give them something more interesting to do.
Merry Christmas.
May the Wisdom, Grace, and Peace of Christ Jesus be with you all.
Merry Christmas Nostr 🧡🙏
John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/2002155838467965273?s=20
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/2001732069496402418?s=20
nostr:note17m3a034eq8mcsu5aqftgnq8syk6nhp8cgsac3rxgtd97asyj7eqs7hz82m
The real question is have you bought more supplements lately? 😬
We have a long way to go 🫡
More spam 👍
No response Kid?
Don’t trade your eternal soul for coins in this world.
I asked the question first- so right back at you little buddy!
Btw, here is my answer, in a simple image easy for you to understand. The filters obviously limited acceptable and popular op_return usage to under the default limit.
NOW YOUR TURN!
WHAT BENEFIT DID THE CHANGE BRING?
You go first shitcoiner.
What BENEFIT to Bitcoin has been achieved by core v30 mempool?
The main purpose of opening up the op return filter is more shitcoins.
If you don’t think core devs are shitcoiners, please tell what benefit did the changes in v30 mempool policy bring?
Most people are actually shitcoiners
Max 10-20% of people are the ones who make a difference in the world
Hi Marko yes my last 3 posts on my profile
I used primal server to upload .mp4 videos from desktop
Then on mobile Nostur, the videos don’t load- only audio.
Here is one:
GM, some mutant covid cold I think. I’m in day 5 now
That dream sounds solid
Why are #primal video uploads not loading correctly on other apps?
But our resident anti-fascist coiners nostr:npub1aeh2zw4elewy5682lxc6xnlqzjnxksq303gwu2npfaxd49vmde6qcq4nwxand nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424 told me Antifa wasn’t real…
How does it feel to be a saboteur working to undermine humanity’s best chance at freedom from global tyranny?
Spreading lies and distractions, keeping your brothers in chains.
Peak traitor.
Best decision 🙌🤝
Teach them how to teach themselves!
So segwit isn’t “consensus”?
I have a bad definition then
Interesting, you removed your own filters before correct?
Also would you support the concept of a soft fork to change consensus and limit extra data?
And you will relay 1mb op_returns to other nodes?
That’s why the State is actively looking for leverage over Bitcoin
I need to read more too, sorry
So the point is I think I posted earlier:
It seems something is seriously wrong with Bitcoin core. This tweet is a core dev in 2023.
Relaying plain text csam to other nodes is a concern for me personally, so I’m running knots to avoid that- and also demonstrate my disagreement with core and hopefully get them to reverse the change. Which is what they should do if this tweet correctly describes the development process.
It’s not about bypassing or the effectiveness of filters, it’s about core trying to seize governance over Bitcoin
I do disagree because it’s not fruitless, core has already changed the proposal twice. So we would like them to reverse it completely.
So is your perception of this issue more based on people saying you should “switch to knots” or do you see people like me disagreeing with Core’s proposed change, and using knots as a vehicle to make themselves heard?
I think it’s an interesting historical event and I appreciate your conversation. 🤝
Right now all current nodes filter by default.
Since you support v30, have you personally changed your -datacarriersize option ?
You can increase it to 100k today, why are you waiting for the update?
Excuse me sir but your concept of the “effectiveness of filters” doesn’t matter. 😅
All mainline nodes currently default filter. 👍
Changing the default means making a change. 🧐
When lots of people are arguing and 20% of the network is now running an alternative client (first time in Bitcoin history btw) 🥳
Bitcoin core GitHub reputation and public perception is arguably the most negative it has ever been in bitcoin’s history... 🥲
That means the change is “controversial” to say the least. 😬
And what do we do when something is too controversial? 👁️👁️
If miners or a single team of devs can control Bitcoin then it’s a failed project
The CHANGE proposed in Core v30, is controversial, thus- following Core Devs argument displayed here in this tweet- the CHANGE should not move forward.
All current/old versions of Bitcoin-core “agree” with knots and use filters by default. That is the status-quo.
Running the Knots client is a way to call out and protest the Core v30 change.
The argument isn’t about Knots, or “ego”. It’s about Core and how they should reverse this decision to proceed with this controversial and potentially dangerous change.