Avatar
47
3492dd43d496a237f4441fd801f5078b63542c3e158ffea903cb020a1af4ffdd

hot tip - it’s not out of a packet 🫡

enjoyiny the most lit biltong rn

fatty af

highly regarded.

this is peak central planning vibes.

Ignore the market then tell the market what is easier for them despite the conclusion the market already arrived at.

Completely retarded.

Replying to Avatar Shawn

Delivered to my state senators. I look forward to the responses.

Dear Senator Hagerty and Senator Blackburn,

As your constituent in Tennessee, I am writing to demand immediate congressional action on the widespread fraud within Medicare and other federal programs—and corresponding relief for American taxpayers.

The numbers are indefensible:

- The Government Accountability Office estimates the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud.

- CMS reported $87.1 billion in improper payments across Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP in FY 2024—including $31.7 billion in Medicare Fee-for-Service and $31.1 billion in Medicaid.

- MedPAC estimates the federal government overpays Medicare Advantage plans by $84 billion annually, $40 billion of which stems from questionable coding practices.

- In Minnesota, federal prosecutors believe half or more of $18 billion spent on 14 Medicaid programs since 2018 may be fraudulent—what the U.S. Attorney's Office called fraud at "staggering industrial scale."

- Since FY 2003, cumulative improper payments have reached $2.7 trillion.

At current rates, taxpayers face $43-81 billion in additional improper payments over the next six months, with total fraud exposure potentially reaching $116-260 billion.

I expect you to:

1. Support and expand congressional investigations into Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security fraud with public hearings and transparent reporting.

2. Hold agency leadership accountable for oversight failures—including criminal prosecution and imprisonment of officials who enabled, ignored, or participated in fraud. No more quiet resignations with pensions intact. Private sector executives go to prison for fraud at this scale. Public officials should face the same.

3. Pass legislation requiring proportional federal income tax reductions as fraud is recovered. Recovered dollars should return to taxpayers, not disappear into new spending.

4. Implement structural reforms: prepayment claim reviews, tighter provider screening, and prosecution of both fraud perpetrators and the officials who let it happen.

Medicaid Fraud Control Units returned $3.46 for every $1 spent in FY 2024. Enforcement works when there is will to enforce.

Tennesseans work hard for their income. We will not accept losing our tax dollars to fraud while being told there is no room for relief. We expect action, and we expect those responsible to face consequences.

I will be watching your response and will remember it at the ballot box.

Respectfully,

i thought TN was 0% tax?

Had a version sent to me with the caption

“They took my oil too”

Replying to Avatar wavy.

too much accurate

looks outside, see’s a chemtrail. Great. 🙃

Replying to Avatar walker

The UK is insane… here you have Idris Elba calling for the removal of *points* from kitchen knives to stop knife attacks…

He also says they should BAN all “heritage knives” and you should need a license to own your grandad’s sword because current “loopholes” allow people to buy ninja swords.

This is the same logic that leftists in the USA use for guns, blaming the guns instead of blaming the people who use them for violent attacks.

Guns don’t kill people.

Knives don’t kill people.

PEOPLE kill people.

Owning a gun is illegal in the UK (with very narrow exceptions). If making guns illegal stopped murder, then the UK wouldn’t proposing blunting knives and making swords illegal. But let’s just say the UK managed to blunt all the kitchen knives and ban all the swords, then what? Will murders stop? Of course not.

What else will they need to ban?

Will automobiles become illegal? After all, you can drive a car into a crowd and cause a lot of carnage.

What about lashing a rock to a stick to make a club?

What about chipping away at that rock to sharpen it to turn it into a rudimentary axe?

What about just sharpening a stick?

What about rubbing a rock against the tip of your blunted kitchen knife until it becomes a sharp point?

What about glass windows? They should definitely be illegal because you can break a window, wrap a piece of cloth around a shard of glass, and voila, you have a knife.

A small minority of people will always use tools to do bad things. Banning those tools doesn’t stop bad people from doing bad things. It just stops good people from using the tools.

(It also leaves citizens completely disarmed and unable to resist the overreach of a fully-armed totalitarian state).

https://v.nostr.build/cFdWNKCKf0HJkgGL.mp4

the trend is clear

2025 was the beginning of the second phase of US devaluation as part of the reset. The first being the flu hysteria

2026 will see the trend accelerate

am I right in saying there are no good australian comedians?

The only international law, is the law of the jungle

nostr:note1g8t9zf56wwfqazqj8edh02ylmqzpyxlaehwgc4hve8vdmzxsyexsnmxqmy

Replying to Avatar thepurpose

Usually I wouldn’t waste time amplifying a low‑signal debate, but I keep seeing people conflate “anti‑national” with “anti‑American.” Let me set the record straight: being anti‑national means I’m fundamentally distrustful of nationalism as an ideology -not of any specific country.

Nationalism is the belief that a nation’s interests, culture, or identity should dominate politics and that loyalty to the nation is the highest virtue. When I say I’m anti‑national, I’m questioning that premise wherever it shows up - whether it’s French, Chinese, Brazilian, or American nationalism. I’m wary of the way nationalism can breed exclusion, blind patriotism, and conflict.

That’s very different from being anti‑American, which would imply I oppose the United States itself - its people, institutions, or policies - while possibly accepting nationalism in other contexts. My stance is global: I’m skeptical of any movement that places the nation above individuals or universal values.

Think of it like the tech argument in nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u ’s note: “Don’t let identity politics dictate your relay policy.” Just as nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u urges us to choose node software based on merit rather than tribal allegiance, I urge us to evaluate ideas on their own merits rather than accepting them because they come wrapped in nationalist rhetoric. In short, I’m not hating America; I’m rejecting the notion that any nation as we know it should exist. Networkstate mindfuck included.

nostr:nevent1qqsd930swc45fxkkpvn93emh6awyvph36c5kqzhndprgx4lv7rpsrgspypmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0v3jhyatwdejhyuewdejhgam0wf4j7q3qcj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsxpqqqqqqzlp4arg

h/t nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u. PV 🫂

few

the rise in nationalism is a tragic and predictable dynamic through this part of the play.

nationalism is completely retarded, unless you actually think the anatomy of the state is a good one.

It seems self evident at this point that it’s not

trying out kagi's browser, Orion

Replying to Avatar ivy lumi

As life is always layered, the roots are always much deeper.

The world becomes more complicated than ever - where every intention is observed. It made everyone mean. Yet, somehow it also became simpler.

After one too many honest conversations with ourselves, we find peace. And of course, those conversations are continuous. But that’s not even the hardest part. The harder part is to pursue it - the leap of faith.

I can’t help but realize this year’s journey was about the relationship between love and truth. What comes first? What’s more important? What’s left when one is absent? And what does it feel like when truth and love coexist without much friction?

When death is in sight, which matters more - truth or love? What would you let go of last?

What happens when someone doesn’t realize they’re being abusive? How long do you tolerate before standing up and walking away? How much is enough? How much is too much? I’ve been doing this math my whole life. A delicate dance indeed.

My New Year’s resolution is to know when to slow down, to release the excessive energy that can't be directed towards love and healing. To know when it’s too much - that's to know how to truly live with low time preference. A challenge, as always.

Have been watching Pluribus - apparently one of the most watched shows on Apple TV? LOL - see how much people are starving for peace and love? And how much rejection we’re willing to endure when it comes to unconditional love, all because of fear and trauma. It’s heartbreaking, all the grief that comes with it.

I’m grateful for everything that lined up exactly as it did, so a delicate piece of consciousness like me gets to witness it all.

Would you do nothing when you could have done anything? What would you do? Maybe that should be our New Year’s resolution.

Cheers to peace. Love is the cure.

Happy New Year 🥂✨

🫂

is that good or bad ?

Basically less tolerant of retarded fluoridated water drinkers ?

the retarded australian commie's attempting to ban social media for under 16 year old slaves should be a great lesson

these people are fucking idiots.

they couldn't implement a well cooked meal

the kids are just ignoring them, along with the majority of the population.

don't let them break your spirit with their online propaganda.

embrace their inability to take meaningful action and bloom accordingly

i’m so grateful to be a nobody