Excuse me sir but your concept of the “effectiveness of filters” doesn’t matter. 😅

All mainline nodes currently default filter. 👍

Changing the default means making a change. 🧐

When lots of people are arguing and 20% of the network is now running an alternative client (first time in Bitcoin history btw) 🥳

Bitcoin core GitHub reputation and public perception is arguably the most negative it has ever been in bitcoin’s history... 🥲

That means the change is “controversial” to say the least. 😬

And what do we do when something is too controversial? 👁️👁️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

How many run both node types? I know of several people that do

Right now all current nodes filter by default.

Since you support v30, have you personally changed your -datacarriersize option ?

You can increase it to 100k today, why are you waiting for the update?

I never said I supported 30. I haven't upgraded to it, yet. I definitely do not support knots. The moronic arguing is fruitless. Run what you want, I really don't care but Knots will filter itself into uselessness. Both sides need their heads banging together for acting like children

Core have stepped way out of line. They started all this with the lies and sneakiness.

Knots is just the Status Quo.

So is your perception of this issue more based on people saying you should “switch to knots” or do you see people like me disagreeing with Core’s proposed change, and using knots as a vehicle to make themselves heard?

I think it’s an interesting historical event and I appreciate your conversation. 🤝

I think it is your choice. I don't agree with it but who am I to say. This initial thread was started by me saying that the CSAM argument is dumb. Which it is. I also said that the Knots argument of bitcoin should just be money is far stronger.

I believe that the two groups are actually very like minded but the egos people have aligned themselves with are adamant and, if I may say, childish. Some of the comments I've received are laughable. People seem to have forgotten how to think critically.

I try to be open minded about everything. If I am uneducated about a subject I wish to participate in, I try to learn objectively. I am not always right. On this subject, with consensus the job of nodes, it is plain that at this time, knots doesn't have consensus to stop miners bypassing their filters. It is unlikely they will ever have it and more likely that they will fork. In my opinion.

It’s not about bypassing or the effectiveness of filters, it’s about core trying to seize governance over Bitcoin

Be careful who you put your TRUST in

You need to read more

Oh I'm sorry, you are quite correct. I'm just an idiot. How can I not agree with you. Thank you for insulting me

I need to read more too, sorry

So the point is I think I posted earlier:

It seems something is seriously wrong with Bitcoin core. This tweet is a core dev in 2023.

Relaying plain text csam to other nodes is a concern for me personally, so I’m running knots to avoid that- and also demonstrate my disagreement with core and hopefully get them to reverse the change. Which is what they should do if this tweet correctly describes the development process.

I do disagree because it’s not fruitless, core has already changed the proposal twice. So we would like them to reverse it completely.

They keep acting like knots is the one making changes. Wtf..