I think it is your choice. I don't agree with it but who am I to say. This initial thread was started by me saying that the CSAM argument is dumb. Which it is. I also said that the Knots argument of bitcoin should just be money is far stronger.
I believe that the two groups are actually very like minded but the egos people have aligned themselves with are adamant and, if I may say, childish. Some of the comments I've received are laughable. People seem to have forgotten how to think critically.
I try to be open minded about everything. If I am uneducated about a subject I wish to participate in, I try to learn objectively. I am not always right. On this subject, with consensus the job of nodes, it is plain that at this time, knots doesn't have consensus to stop miners bypassing their filters. It is unlikely they will ever have it and more likely that they will fork. In my opinion.
It’s not about bypassing or the effectiveness of filters, it’s about core trying to seize governance over Bitcoin
Be careful who you put your TRUST in
Oh I'm sorry, you are quite correct. I'm just an idiot. How can I not agree with you. Thank you for insulting me
I need to read more too, sorry
So the point is I think I posted earlier:
It seems something is seriously wrong with Bitcoin core. This tweet is a core dev in 2023.
Relaying plain text csam to other nodes is a concern for me personally, so I’m running knots to avoid that- and also demonstrate my disagreement with core and hopefully get them to reverse the change. Which is what they should do if this tweet correctly describes the development process.

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed