On Multinut payments by nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzd96xxmmfdecxzunt9e3k7mgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mq9hxafw
"Imagine having to pay a landscaper for doing work and you have money on Cash App, Venmo, and PayPal, all of which you don't fully trust. However, you keep a small balance on each of them just in case you need to spend between friends or with certain vendors. The landscaping bill is a bit heftier than it typically is, so instead of sending funds from Cash App, Venmo, and PayPal to your bank account to then pay the landscaper instead, you combine part of the balance from each application to pay the singular invoice the landscaper has provided you. That is essentially what has just been launched on the Cashu protocol.
...
Most are completely missing it, but the cypherpunk future is being built out right before our eyes."
Canāt wait to see this merged to cashu.me
Itās because this is an institutional and corporate treasury game now. Retail, who are the ones googling, are not even a blip on that radar this go round.
Even more better, bake them with her.
nevent1qqs2yz6224gh82vc88caa0rk5sspykfn8s0gr32n3y84yh278awqlecppemhxue69uh5qmn0wvhxcmmvckyqwm
Personally I think I am for the change but definitely not how the process is playing out.
Should I modify nostr:nprofile1qqspcm9j9xtt42lfyx7dghytvgfm9k4sjmuguja9v7x585v45xrg25gpzemhxue69uhhwmm59ehx7um5wgh8qctjw3uj7l96qqk to only post massive losses?
Right now it posts any loss over 1 BTC, and I get a lot of feedback that it posts too much
But I also get a lot of feedback that people like it as is
I like seeing it at all levels but maybe you create a second bot which is only massive losses. @rektbotmaxpain
A key point that I think is being overlooked in the debate it the difference between developers and maintainers of the project.
Developers are free to do as they please, write whatever code they want, and to submit whatever pull request they want.
Maintainers are supposed to only be stewards. They should not merge code that is has mot gained general consensus among users of the codebase.
If developers really really want to remove the OP_RETURN filters, they should be the ones forking bitcoin-core and pushing for its use. Only then after sufficient acceptance should it be considered for merging back into core.
tl;dr bitcoin-core should not be the bleeding edge of development but should be the slower, hardened and measured approach to change.
I thought bitcoin-core maintainers were supposed to be stewards of the protocol, not working for some patron who pays their salary.
So no, not an excellent take at all.
New Zealand?
Holy shit it's working! Paid a 100k sats Lightning invoice from two different Cashu mints at the same time.
Enter atomic multinut payments.
https://video.nostr.build/935d5c453c00ae7498be116b9c4d4b358d326854fd7cf19ebfa782f69a575a6c.mp4
All Cashu wallets let you use multiple mints. To reduce rug risk, we encourage users to leave only small amounts on each mint. This introduces a big UX challenge which forces users to distribute funds on different mints in a smart way. It's particularly problematic when you're trying to pay a bigger Lightning invoice from your small balances. Who has time for that?
The Lightning protocol allows nodes to split a single payment HTLC into multiple parts to increase the chance of reaching the destination, called Multi-Path Payments (MPP). Typically, that's done from one sender to one receiver. What if... you can just break the rules?
A multinut payment originates from multiple Lightning nodes to pay a single invoice, atomically. Even if none of your mint balances can cover an invoice, as long as your total balance is large enough, you can pay the invoice.
I don't think anyone was crazy enough to do this before. Pretty sure what you see here is the first invoice being paid using a CLN and an LND node at the same time. Amazing work by the team, special thanks to nostr:nprofile1qqsw8lr88lzln8x92ng073m4v72kglf9edhxvk8eztg3ftny98f46dgpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvshsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsk9y93w.
https://video.nostr.build/b9e330fbe21a772c0525ae2fceedaa99a90b8512a501c1f1d3263eac1d55219a.mp4
nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mz7r4hv7r when do you think this will be available in the PWA?
nevent1qqs0q3y69zzwnxfq63xhx2kcgtprtrsfm0q22ms9a7kxyv7tpdhnucgpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wc0ld0ff
This is why your boss wants you coming into the office.
#memes #memestr
https://video.nostr.build/05335603d6fc120c5239580ae27dcef68cb2b98cd6f5d76b818aaaab2815c07b.mp4
Honestly, if she had just stayed in the chair listening, I would have let it slide.
Do pruned nodes really play a role in maintaining decentralization?
True. I suspect it will be tougher to maintain and also functional participate with older versions over the next decade without a fork of the respositoryā¦or some hero who starts back-porting features.
Can I zap a Pull Request?! #asknostr
XRP is a great medium of exchange
Cashu > Lightning > Bitcoin.
XRP can fade into the ether. Why why why do people want that hugely premined turd to succeed?!
ā¦or Work Visa, Student Visa, Permanent Resident Permit?

