Their wallet isn't something that is intended to work with ours via NWC.

Release time! 🚀

In 1.7.0, we've made a number of performance improvements, bug fixes, and new features, but here's the ones we're excited about the most:

- On chain fedimint support

- Transfer funds between federations

- Node operates in a web worker now, the UI should be quicker

If you have a federation added, all on chain deposits to Mutiny will go into there.

We have full send and receive support now, so this effectively gives you a unified balance with fedimint, allowing you to send or receive via onchain & lightning.

The Bitcoin Atlantis federation is shutting down at the end of the month. We now parse all of the metadata for federations and will display pop up warnings like this.

Included in this release is the ability to transfer funds from one federation to another to make this seamless.

Lastly, we've moved all the core logic into a Web Worker. That means the UI thread doesn't have to fight with Mutiny for resources. This should make most wallet operations faster, and keep the UI responsive at all times. It's a big change, so if you see any problems let us know!

Pro tip: Diversify your nostr client usage. Do not rely on a single client. Nostr gives you the freedom to switch at a very low cost.

GM

Today is a great day!

Goggle has removed trust wallet from playstore on android devices 🤔

Let’s be clear, if no one steps up and decides to run LSPs because everyone is worried about regulatory concerns, every bitcoin L2 system is toast - every one that has a reasonable security model relies on some kind of centralized or federated party that has similar concerns, even if they can’t seize funds.

Without any L2 systems everyone using bitcoin will simply use custodial platforms because that’s the only way to get reasonable fees and payment latency.

And don’t go yelling at ACINQ for deciding not to operate Phoenix in the US, the software required to run an LSP is open source, with only relatively minimal liquidity allocation logic required to get started. We need new entrants, and that means new companies who think the risk is manageable (I’m confident it is, but I can’t fault anyone for not wanting to take that risk).

If you see someone suggesting ACINQ should just keep running, the correct response is “well why aren’t you running an LSP”.

Do what you can, where you are, with what you have available to you.

Just start.