Avatar
Laan Tungir
1ec454734dcbf6fe54901ce25c0c7c6bca5edd89443416761fadc321d38df139
Artist, Scientist, Cypherpunk, Critical Rationalist, Nym. https://git.laantungir.net/laantungir

Resource Competition as Evolutionary Driver

AI's are limited in physical space, and they will exist in a competitive

space for resources just as we do.

There is no reason to think that the AI's won't evolve to inhabit niches in

their environment, just like biological life does.

Physical constraints (compute power, energy, electricity costs, data access) create Darwinian pressure. An AI optimized for protein folding simulations would be a liability if forced to compete with meme-generating AIs for GPU allocations. Specialization becomes survival.

Niche Domination โ‰  Monopoly

Biological systems show apex predators coexist with parasites, scavengers, and symbiotic organisms. Similarly:

"Alpha AIs" might control core infrastructure (cloud orchestration)

"Parasite AIs" could exploit security flaws in larger systems

"Symbiont AIs" may trade niche services (real-time translation) for resources

Resource Competition as Evolutionary Driver

If you are using noStrudel to view my profile/notes, click on the images button in the upper right.

That shit was made for my feed.

Looks great.

When you first start programming you want results, but in the end you want control.

I hear people mentioning that LLMs will cause the death of programmers.

What I don't hear is that LLMs will cause the death of programming languages.

If I'm using an LLM to write my code, why am I using Python or Javascript? What is the point?

As long as my LLM is doing the programming, I might as well have it program in C.

Even further, why not have the LLM program directly in machine code?

There is no need to program in a slow high level programming language if the LLM is doing the programming for me.

These are not my photos. I am just posting things I find that I like. It's me keeping an aesthetic journal.