Avatar
ndr
1ff1961c07e1494d0ed462643660142314b907826a701316307606e4b9ffe21c

Unfortunately I'm not sure because I never saw that... But normal closing channel it is at cost of who is asking for it .. About forcing close I'm not sure if it is the same. If your node was a routing one and was causing htlc locking that means that was locking out other nodes sats , well it could be .. If your node it is routing htlc, it should work fine , if not it could cause locking funds from other nodes ..

Block was not full filled when mined and transaction prices staid low

Well, using phoenix it is the same, just you pay more fees than a private ln node .. Channel are convenient if opened when fee are lows and if you invest on sizing them for your spending use , you don't need to going back on chain ...

May be that I miss something of LN protocol so apologies for that .. Let's assume that due to a pendind htlc a channel got closed (non collaborative), who close that? The peer nodes who has the channel on it? Who pays for the closure ?on this kind of multisig transactions could both members apply for cpfp ? And what about rbf? could both apply for that? ... I'm wondering if the one who need to pay more for the non collaborative closure it is always the child one :)

They fear that bitcoin could finance terrorism .. But .. Terrorists are EU that for licking ass to USA , is financing civilians attacks on Russian territory by stealing money by taxes trough unwanted and unelected governments .. Who wants a 3rd world war? Who want ass holes like von der leyen ? Who wants pay electricity bills 4x times? .. No one I beleave ... So this seems be called democracy .. And it is like to naming the shit as chocolate ..

nostr:nevent1qqsy2acrrgqtf0z6de5wjymtrzfln5pp3ftfx40hxa6rgkl2n2ted9gpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qp6phv4f923czsnuv0s4yc9t9l2zrjtycajje58mrxccu6m5wrnsqxpqqqqqqz4jl9k4