Avatar
BzzT!
214ad227ac30fce6f7287a4e9b659784a2298894d783b3294a8df5246e450746
gimme the loot!

Check out fans that people who watercool PCs use, it can be a good starting point.

I totally love that you did this, reminds me of the stuff I did when venturing into watercooling 🤙

Maybe higher static pressure fans would work better for your application?

Privacy Guru Michael Bazzell retires, what can we learn?

We liked his content a lot, and it’s a shame he stopped doing his podcast. One of our readers on Nostr asked us how our content differs. We respect him greatly and this is not a critique, but simply we are targeting a different audience.

His content targets a more novice user and our content is a little more anti-authority, more global, and less trusting of low-end consumer privacy products. For example Bazzell advocates for the use of Protonmail, while as we promote self-hosted email on a VPS. This is more decentralized and private, but requires more effort.

Bazzell suggests the use of Privacy.com cards, which mask your info to the vendor and your bank. This is convenient but ultimately not anonymous, which never was Bazzell’s goal or intent. On the other hand, at Simplified Privacy, we reject fiat money as legitimate, and only use cryptocurrency. We recommend crypto gift card vendors such as CakePay, CoinCards, and Bitrefill to avoid KYC. Some of these even have debit cards. Ultimately, we follow the philosophy of Agorism, and our goal is to create a parallel society outside the control of big tech and banks.

Bazzell is more focused on Signal using a Google Voice or Twillio number. This is practical for many users and his target audience. While as our philosophy is more focused on the broader picture, and we dislike Signal’s centralization and reliance on Amazon’s servers. Instead, we recommend Session for censorship and socialization with strangers, while as SimpleX or XMPP are preferred for pure security. We thought Bazzell’s statement in his book of “I like Session, but it’s not popular” to be reflective of his attitude of purely pragmatic low-level evasion. While as our philosophy is to actively influence society for individuals to self-realize their technological freedom.

Bazzell recommends NextDNS, because of their ability to block or evaluate your traffic. While we see the benefits of this, it’s not right for our particular audience, because then you’re trusting just one company to oversee all traffic. For example if you were to use Tor Browser, you’d be getting a new identity each time. While as NextDNS on one VPN would correlate all traffic as you.

When it comes to phones, Bazzell’s recommendations are a reflection of his focus on convenience to the end user and practicality for the most amount of people in their daily application. For example, he recommends SIM cards INSIDE GrapheneOS phones, and on a podcast he replied to a listener question about external hotspots and routers that it wasn’t that important.

While we acknowledge the practicality and appeal of this to the majority of users, our philosophy is very different and focuses more on those with a higher threat model. We completely dislike SIM cards inside phones because of malware and baseband modem vulnerabilities. Instead, we promote solely EXTERNAL hotspot/router WiFi with VoIP and keeping the hotspot in a faraday bag when you are home. Additionally, we view Google as so hostile, that they can’t even be trusted to manufacture the hardware required for GrapheneOS, so we’re open to non-Google phones with CalyxOS and VM phones on desktop to completely isolate spyware.

Bazzell on his podcast said he only uses OpenVPN, and never WireGuard because of WireGuard’s 2-minute logging of IPs in memory. We respect his decision to recommend this, but we believe it’s not really appropriate for his target audience of novice users. This type of recommendation be more appropriate for Tor users, anti-government journalists, or hackers under extreme or oppressive countries with VPN restrictions. In our subjective opinion, for the vast majority of average Americans (his target audience), the faster speed of WireGuard outweighs the 2-minute IP log.

Bazzell has done numerous podcast episodes discussing System76 Linux computers with PopOS. We think this is great, and would like to add on that System76 is our main recommendation for those coming from Mac/Apple. Not only is this specific audience used to getting both the hardware and operating system bundled together from the same vendor, but Apples can’t dual boot with Linux (easily) like Windows can. Additionally, Chris Titus has a guide on making PopOS aesthetically look like a Mac.

Regarding Bazzell’s pfSense recommendation, this was a good idea up until pfSense switched licenses and is shifting away from FOSS. Now we recommend OPNsense. But this happened AFTER Bazzell’s podcasts/books, so he gets no blame.

Wherever you are Bazzell, you will be missed. I listened to nearly every episode.

Is there an equivalent plugin for pfBlocker-ng (pfSense) on OPNsense? Makes leaving pfSense difficult and the dev said he wouldn't port or create one for OPNsense.

Same. Returned my smartwatch and went back to my manual wind. My automatic is way more convenient but it barely gets any wrist time.

Exactly. They'll nuke it when convenient and not allow people to sell. The sentiment will shift against bitcoin (even though it was just the ETF) and the damage will have been done. Trust erosion in the entire bitcoin space. Our voices will be the minority, unheard, or selected by traditional media to align with their message or taken out of context further creating chaos in our circles.

Replying to Avatar StackSats.IO

Very much disagree with this, it’s a pretty naive take.

- Australia’s CBDC was outsourced to the private sector, mostly the banks, and it’s successfully passed the pilot phase - so much for not giving up their debt creation, they’re working hand in glove with central banks

- Privacy doesn’t override shit for normies. I’ll just point to Snowden’s revelations as evidence if any is needed. If CBDCs are tied to UBI they will jump in head first with no consideration for the implications on privacy and only later look for outside routes when they understand reality.

- We always had gold as a sovereign currency, no-one used it because it wasn’t fit for purpose in the digital age. Sovereign alone isn’t enough, it needs to work for what people/institutions want to use it for.

- There are already functional cross-border CBDCs (Singapore-China) and others have been successfully piloted (read BIS)

- Digital Currency already exists in every fiat system. It’s not that different to a CBDC, that’s just amalgamating them into a unified system.

If post WW2 monetary order was a design choice, what makes you think they’ll make a design choice for something they can’t control? Listen to saifedean or Lyn discussing the uptake of fiat / exit from gold standard in WW1 - once one nation went they all did because game theory effectively forced them to as you can’t win a war against a money printer if you don’t have one yourself.

We’ve got what, 1 country which has decided to take the hard route of getting out from under the IMF and they’re not even done yet - everyone else just keeps sucking that teat. Even Milei is going begging to them.

We’re not going to see CBDCs on Bitcoin-backed fedimints - this is delusional.

Bitcoin will be used but not in this way. It will be the hedge system between the USD world and the BRICS world for countries that can’t/wont go all in on either and simply occupying that position will see it eventually eat both (not Gresham’s law - you’ve made the common mistake of inverting it). It will also form the black market currency for individuals for any transaction people want to make outside the government’s purview which initially just replaces cash but will eat all the usecases they try to impose their dystopia on.

To say you’re unafraid is fine. I’m not afraid of money either. But I see what they’re trying to achieve and given there is no greater prize than control of the money (per Rothschild himself) I think it’s pretty shortsighted to just claim this is “doom-circle-jerk analysis”.

They ARE playing for sheepstations, they’re not going to fuck this up coming from incumbency against a rebel network with 1% uptake.

Bitcoin will win eventually but CBDCs are coming and freedom is going when they do.

Wanted to add that "bitcoin will eventually win" is not a certainty either, nor should we all be so complacent that it is inevitable. Victory should not be declared until it is earned, and history also shows that early declarations of perceived victory has led many to ruin. We are playing against opponents with vast resources and no regard for laws, who are currently also using their countries as testing grounds for what society will accept, through various freedom, privacy erosions.

Add digital identity systems as a forced requirement to receive UBI via CBDCs, the masses will push the tipping point towards adoption. Privacy will be further eroded. When they shift the window to obsolete current forms of money like cash in favor of CBDCs, and as CBDCs become more widely used and accepted, where will bitcoin fit? Who will be left to transact with which they won't be able to identify? They will control the bitcoin narrative through all the traditional financial institutions via ETF and traditional media. It's not impossible that they will even be willing to sacrifice the bitcoin ETF and ecosystem to further their goals. The masses who own "bitcoin" through these ETFs will believe whatever they are told.

Side note on digital identity systems and the roadmap, current uses. Extrapolate what could be possible in our futures if these systems become the norm:

https://media.ccc.de/v/37c3-12004-please_identify_yourself

There's the list they will release and the list that they will still withhold. That's the list we want

This is why freeing minds is so much more important than ngu or ordinals or whatever topic we decide to debate and concern ourselves with today. I don't care if we use ngu or ordinals or whatever to free someone and bring them to our side. We are going to need every one we can get if we are to succeed together.

nostr:nevent1qqsvt7fqp6hqze0gedsjd79zyxwnx00k4c4nuhk7qxz0wz50f2a57pgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzypjed5qpmj0wpt5mj2g8mjgq233qnp9zyyuf4z0gan2xvzzyu8j76qcyqqqqqqgusw2pj