Nostr Web Client

HOW TO DEFELT SURETY.

TAKE NOTICE THAT: In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY OF A PUBLIC DOCUMENT has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as an “accused” and/or a “suspect”.

FORGIVE ME: If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to “You”, and/or “SATOSHI NAKAMOTO”, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me.

If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to “You”, and/or "SATOSHI NAKAMOTO”, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am, in ANY CAPACITY, a Pro Se litigant and/or a LEGAL PERSON in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, as I DO NOT CONSENT and WAIVE THE BENEFIT to such titles (Waiver of the CHANGE OF NAMES ACT OF ONTARIO), and please forgive me.

THEREFORE: As I have no knowledge of who “You” and or “JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN” and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION ANY COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies [HEREAFTER “YOU”], HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY ARE “YOU” ADDRESSING me as such?

As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT [In the custody of Justice Wailan Low, ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE: Court File Number CV-11-430464], WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as a MAN who is not lawfully entitled to the BENEFITS of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE [PPSACA13078], have any SURETY in this matter?

As GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to ANY NAME?

WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have, that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE and/or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE do “YOU” have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal?

WHAT EVIDENCE do “YOU” have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter?

As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE.

AI dumbing it down for you.

The notice appears to be a legal statement addressing a mistake in the identification of the sole beneficiary of a public document. The notice is written in a formal and legal tone, using specific terminology and legalese, suggesting that the writer is likely familiar with legal proceedings and the terminology associated with them.

The writer begins by asserting that they believe there has been a mistake in identifying them as an "accused" and/or a "suspect" in a public document. This suggests that they are asserting their innocence and claiming that they have been incorrectly implicated in a legal matter.

The writer then requests forgiveness if they have led any court, statutory body, or government service to believe that they are the party with surety in the matter. This implies that they are stating that they have no responsibility or liability for any actions or events related to the matter, and that any such belief is a mistake.

The writer also requests forgiveness if they have been mistakenly identified as a Pro Se litigant or a legal person in the matter, without their consent. This suggests that they are asserting their right to be identified as a natural person rather than a legal entity, and that any such identification is incorrect.

The writer then asks by what authority they are being addressed as such and requests evidence of their surety or trusteeship over the legal name. This implies that they are questioning the legal basis for the identification of them as the party with surety in the matter and are demanding evidence to support this assertion.

The writer also questions the evidence for their status as an officer, agent, trustee, or employee of the Crown. This suggests that they are asserting their independence from any government or corporate entity and denying any legal or contractual relationship with them.

Finally, the writer declines any offer made and requests immediate discharge and closure of the matter. This implies that they are rejecting any legal proceedings or agreements related to the matter and are seeking to bring the matter to a swift and final conclusion.

Overall, the notice appears to be a legal assertion of innocence, identity, and independence, accompanied by a demand for evidence to support any identification or legal status asserted against the writer. The writer is asserting their right to be identified as a natural person rather than a legal entity and is seeking to bring any legal proceedings or agreements related to the matter to a swift and final conclusion.