Avatar
Nobstirtonic
23175434ea127a73da80e419cd9813ea0e8cfa089793c461d9a2b9d98d30b7ca

Back in the 80's a trip to the dump was amazing! Donating to second hand shops make me feel like I really need to consume less, but giving or receiving "Hand me downs" is awesome.

You know who really doesn't like this: https://blog.torproject.org/releasing-mullvad-browser/ Corporate IT. Put it on your fiat mining machine and let me know how long it takes for you to get the call.

#[0] recommend 20

Every relay is a honeypot that's why we anon.

Everything published related to Bitcoin inheritance planning that comes up online with a simple search is anti sovereign Bitcoiner. They all introduce multiple third-party intermediaries and focuses on working "within the existing legal framework". I get that most of this is coming from legacy financial advisors and "coordinators" of multi-sig services but it is still disappointing.

We have this amazing thing called Bitcoin that we can each individually utilize to regain some semblance of sovereignty, but it seems like even some self proclaimed Bitcoin only types are missing the opportunity to emphasize the mind blowing elements of the sovereignty available within the topic of "inheritance planning".

Is it as simple (and stupid) as it's hard to monitize helping people become more sovereign? Is it KYC complications combined with a focus on "mass adoption"? Is it just a warped risk assessment (focusing on consequences versus probability) which makes it so personal that you have to arrive at it alone?

Why do you think this is?

From these guys: npub183l4jj94mqysqpr2vlvw806fw8tvhgqn40kwrh259m9zy08nm5lsl2dkxg

Did I just get my first crypto airdrop scam DM from red envelop?