Here is a quick tour of the #Bitcoin Center in Berlin, El Salvador 🇸🇻
If you haven’t heard, we are a little community found on nostr:npub1864jglrrhv6alguwql9pqtmd5296nww5dpcewapmmcazk8vq4mks0tt2tq on the volcano that mines El Salvador’s geothermal #bitcoin
Enjoy ☺️
Epic!
New interview with Michael Saylor. I did ask regarding ossification and developer funding.
https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/bitcoin-is-forever-money
Michael Saylor is a Clown.
Read Roger Ver's "Hijacking Bitcoin". Then read the 'Blockchain Wars'. Then use your brain to draw your own conclusions.
What the fuck happened to "Don't trust, verify"?
Also nobody said you need to make the blockchain 12tb now.
Just holding on to the 1mb block size because somebody wants to be able to run a node on a $50 usd raspberry pie or his apple watch and every user on the network needs to suffer from high fees, slow transaction times, terrible self hosted lightning onboarding etc. is just a completely retarded argument.
Just like Bill Gates said in the 80s, 640kb of ram should be enough for everybody...
Scaling the block size to 10mb or so would solve so many problems, help the bitcoin adoption tremendously, make it cheap to open lightning channels, move away from custodial wallets etc.
But, when a majority of the developers is paid by companies which have direct incentives to keep the blocksize small so they can sell their solutions ( Blockstream, Lightning Labs etc. ), this obviously does not happen.
That people say Bitcoin is decentralized when it is actually controlled by a few entities is a mystery to me.
Totally, trusting a FEDerated mint is like trusting the FED. There are also a bunch of people i dont know who say they only have my wellbeing in mind and i should trust them. Where is the difference?
I have read the page you sent me and i have played around with ecash, what i do not understand at all - you get a string from a mint, send it to somebody else and he goes to the mint and pastes that string into a textarea on the mints website.
So the mint can log the ip of who gets the string and the ip of who redeems the string and where is the great privacy in that?
Also the faq you sent me did not answer this question to me.
Reading Hal Finney's "Protecting Privacy with Electronic Cash" after a discussion with nostr:npub1w69ya7xs697hk3hky3gllryz8rwverfa0ylz89chf9qnhfcskc2s64zltw and nostr:npub1j4u5gjzjyggr3h96x3gjy4akdgwxuk7mgvumv72gym2qyje7fn5s47d6x9.
I think Hal would have liked the combination of bitcoin + Nostr + eCash as a creative way to describe the problems he talks about here.
https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/protecting-privacy-with-electronic-cash/


Hal would have used Monero
the conversation and your questions are actually pretty boring.
it does not require a high iq to imagine that there will be people who do not comply, like people buying drugs now or evade taxes nowadays. if they use a value transfer system which allows them to stay anonymous, they can do their own thing. if they use a public ledger without privacy, they can not. hard to get?
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
did you check if a plugin is infected for example?
idk. most people got a experimental gene therapy because they were told to, i do not see much consciousness there at all
most people will degenerate, a small group will use Ai for their advantage and create stuff from home which needed 500 employees in the past, imo.
me not either. why would you buy a steak with monero?
if they know who is the seller, see darknet markets.
Because nobody can say if you own any, which addresses you have, if you have any at all.
There is a reason why ransomware payments are done in monero
They can not do that to Monero, that is the point.
