I come back to what I said, it’s terrifying there are people who buy these fake Satoshi
You realize there are FAKE satoshi on bitcoin!!!! 
nostr:note1eg98xvyeadrqlxztjhccrcqden3z0dll6hcnrhslzz4s47tqda7qf8ypu4
I’ll let you see the lax answers I got on bitcoin dev
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-July/thread.html
Unfortunately it has been months since we said that there is a problem unfortunately no developer has really helped us although there have been attempts
The UTXOs set increased by 1.68 GB in exactly 3 months knowing that it took a decade for it to reach 4.5GB. At this speed of growth in 10 years the UTXOs set will have a weight of ~70GB.
“Inscriptions have no bearing on sat supply.”
Clearly you and your kind are wishing to inflate the sat supply:
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/357097
“Bitcoin full node operators implicitly agree on potential blockchain storage space growing at about 200GB annually.”
Previous node operators and new ones implicitly agreed on a new kind of transaction structure: Signature Segregation, nothing else.
“As to libraries storing content, Id welcome it. Such data would likely be an improvement over whats there now.”
Your kind do not need to put content and perform aggression on my storage for stream of bits which can be interpreted as wish and probably not found in other networks for some reason; like:
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/169689
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/169631
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/169739
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/169888
“people pay fees for blockspace, not for every node”
If that were true, then your are double aggressing my property, because you and your kind are not pay me fees for the blockspace which you and your kind are consuming (so far 11,8 GB).
People are paying compensation to mining operators for the loss of marginal competitiveness at block transmission due to additional transaction.
“I find it is essential to adapt to the changing world to survive and thrive.”
And that’s what every regular Bitcoin node operator is doing; it was never different; not even at genesis.
We still have to put things in context the « sats » of this inscription have absolutely no value since they are not part of the consensus, the spammer who did it just wants to play with the confusion to try to make money
So they can try to increase the supply but they won’t make it. 
They do not need inscription for spam, he could make hundreds of tx of 546 stats each to flood the UTXOs set.
nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk: Is there a list of who are the participants of that “developer mailings list”? So far I have not read any comment regarding the relevant aspects of this topic.
You can register here:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Update I managed to activate the argument! Problem it only compiles on macOS. nostr:note1e5p9gn8mquq82nhqh5n23jezuvfrdpw5ggeuleqcpxpjkaxc62sq9rdgmm
I managed to implement the « relayinscription » argument but it does not activate anything at the moment. 
Many people say « bitcoin fix this » but too few people take the time to say « fix bitcoin ».
I set up my own node. All that remains is to hope for no closure in this kind of fees environment.
Damn, I just sent my answer just now 😖
https://damus.io/note1ynplepaueuuaur8ra7hehdwrkrlshq29f4hr3xr83ytg6y4mmf0qm7vgp0
nostr:note1r4tummm4sarylrnh9qnztk555umx0xusqzaj40xuylvm65ysah4qpz9pd5
He has several options to stop inscriptions, however legal actions are not part of it.
Well, prove to me that I’m wrong by giving us the only thing we can’t get ourselves, the code.
Thank you, I was looking for arguments to answer the email.