Yeah, and an odd urge to.. jump. It's like a subconscious voice tempting you to do it.
I get intrusive thoughts about jumping off / leaping from edges and great heights but it doesn't really bother me, it's just an automatic but odd response.
Does your brain do that too? If you have a fear of heights I can see that combination sucking 😅
Practically all of them do, you can only limit the damage with these unpredictable events.
It only reduces response times, it does not prevent anything.
I pay 60% of my monthly income on rent.
I love existing. 🥰
Fair - but encryption aside: nostr is specifically designed to avoid any P2P aspects.
For better or for worse the relay model is what defines nostr 🤷♂️ - we'll see if that pans out.
"It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; **it does not rely on P2P techniques, and therefore it works.**" - https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr
Mind you I'm not convinced that nostr as a concept is actually viable without big centralized relays essentially operating as their own walled gardens in distinct communities
Fair - but encryption aside: nostr is specifically designed to avoid any P2P aspects.
For better or for worse the relay model is what defines nostr 🤷♂️ - we'll see if that pans out.
"It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; **it does not rely on P2P techniques, and therefore it works.**" - https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr
absolutely pathetic
This is a French peculiarity, not an EU one. They've always been weird about encryption.
Unironically posting garbage from the DailyMail is an interesting indicator of either a) your intelligence or b) malice.
Make tomato sauce and jar it!
Nostr's whole point is that it isn't P2P. Relays are fundamental to that. If your solution is P2P, it's not nostr.
Ideally, relays should not see any plaintext unencrypted content that would make them liable, but idk how that would work.
But yes, currently relays are a liability nightmare.
My coturn is already setup for nextcloud/REST, so shared secret auth is enabled.
Once you do that, the only format for username/password auth you can use will be turn:timestamp:username:key@hostname:port
The username will necessarily be of the format xxx:yyy in this case.
Classic username:password and REST can't be configured at the same time on coturn
OK, looking at: https://github.com/0xchat-app/0xchat-app-base/blob/ebcc02d8a886c2c9e37a508dffe4d9ead9b7e198/ox_common/lib/model/ice_server_model.dart#L90
They should just let you specify a username and password manually. Their approach is broken if you're using static auth since the username field will be timestamp:username and the password is the key
so it would be formatted as timestamp:username:key which their code won't handle as it expects username:password
blegh
SimpleX isn't the issue, it's 0xchat.
anyone know the format for a custom ICE server on 0xchat? It isn't documented.
Presumably I would need to specify the secret in addition to the hostname for TURN; but in what manner? Do I need a duplicate entry for STUN? 🤔
While you're here, what is the difference between SimpleX and 0xchat
Apparently so
You'd have a better chance by actually promoting self sovereignty and bitcoin to democratic bases and hopefully finding a pro bitcoin democratic candidate in the future.
Pandering to the right is useless. Trumpian politics fucked the republican party to the point of no return.





