Avatar
Bloody Fissures
281eae38ad21cef0e2a5cb8e79751fa15c014861f2b26896042482b779418cd6

I'm glad this year is over. Thank God.

Replying to Avatar weev

Recently a longtime associate of mine asked about the origin of the slur "dog brain" which is now used almost exclusively against women. As a longtime connoisseur of rape, misogyny, verbal abuse, and physical violence towards women, I decided to investigate the history of this beloved and alluring term which so accurately describes the female psyche.

The insult "dog-brained" first appears in print in 1835, in Robert Montgomery Byrd's The Infidel, Or the Fall of Mexico: https://archive.org/details/cortesorfallmex02birdgoog

"Dog-brained churl and ass" one of the main characters used to rebuke a Mexican. Byrd is a name I recognized from reading his "Nick of the Woods", which is an awesome novel about committing revenge genocide against Injuns that I actually recommend you read if you're into Tom Quick the Indian Slayer portrayed as a emotionally tortured Quaker. I also searched for "dog brain" up until 1835 just to confirm Byrd as the originator of the term as an insult -- every prior usage of dog brain is in reference to actual canine grey matter. Dog brained is then used again by an author of no renown in another novel in 1878, and in a short story in Munsey's Magazine at the turn of the century. It then disappears from publication for decades.

It returns as a more pointed insult in the 1970s, used against Communists, "dog-brained bureaucrats of the Soviet Union" in Finis Farr's 1975 "Fair Enough: The Life of Westbrook Pegler" and expliticly misogynistic "DOG BRAINED BITCH!" in a 1979 issue of Denver Quarterly, in reference to an obese and ugly woman.

Then it nearly disappears from publication again, besides a single instance in a TV guide in the 80s. Then in 1995 Laurence James under the pseudonym James Axler used the phrase in his "Shadowfall", the 26th book in the Deathlands saga, which is about a postapocalyptic society of eternal road war. From there the most common instance in the phrase is in multiple publications dedicated to FASA's franchise Shadowrun starting with 1998's Psychotrope. As far as I can tell, Shadowrun is the first instance of a society of multiple authors using the term in a small community and likely the body of authors which popularized the term for general usage. After that it reentered the common vernacular and there are a lot of post-2010 uses of the term.

As far as I can tell "dog brain" and "dog brains" as a noun used to describe people rather than "dog-brained" as an adjective is a development that came with social media.

Dog-brained has its linguistic origins in a documented genocide appreciator and a notable history of being leveled as a term against communists and women, making it extremely based and redpilled. I recommend you use this term more often and also inform those using it about its storied roots in Racial Holy War, woman-hatred, and anti-Communist polemic.

My dogs are smarter, kinder, more loyal, more attractive, funnier, calmer, less needy, and balanced than most woman I've known. Calling women dog brained is an insult to dogs. I'll be needing another term.

Can confirm. I'm said normie and there's definitely a learning curve. I learn best by reading on my own and trying different clients. What I like about this is I only get info from people I follow, not people some dumbass algo says I need to see. It's kind of like back in the olden days where you have to do the work to find stuff you like instead of having it force fed. Much better vibe on Nostr. More people will come once somebody dumbs everything down to make it not such a struggle for normies to get involved.

But, then you'll have soccer moms and "influencers", total dipshits, Karen's, and a various collection of dumb asses coming over. Not looking forward to that but I won't have them shoved in my face unless they seek me out.

Replying to Avatar weev

I like a lot of Arabs but Palestinians have been completely treacherous to the rest of the Arab world. Jordan gave them asylum first and they tried to murder the king and take over the country, it was called Black September. Lebanon gave them asylum and Arafat declared “the road to Palestine begins in Jounieh” and the Palestinians began killing Lebanese Christians. Syria gave Palestinians asylum and they joined Al Qaeda to overthrow Assad and collapse the country. Palestinians are completely subhuman animals and if you trust one for a moment they will consistently stab you in the back.

So the slaughter of Palestinians means little to me insofar as various peoples go. Truly Palestinians are a perfect match for Jews, as they are both in the top 5 for corrosively to the nation state and its polity. The two truly deserve one another.

No, what truly gets me is the fucking hypocrisy. Jewish elites loudly protested the extremely moderate Donald Trump as inhumane, constantly comparing his modest immigration policies to the alleged death camps of Adolf Hitler. They actively fund groups like HIAS with billions to bus vast numbers of hostile browns northward. They collectively voted 79% in the last election for Kamala. So not only do they say with their actions, votes and checkbooks that it is completely unacceptable for us to even deport these hostile brown criminals, but at the same time they declare that we should accept that they murder the children of theirs. These positions are mutually exclusive and I think they should be exterminated simply for the hypocrisy of it.

I wouldn't mind if someone carpet bombed the entirety of "Palestine" or Gaza and completely eliminated everyone contained within its borders. There are no innocent Palestinians. Even the children have been taught to hate and murder in the name of Islam.

As for the Jews; they've been naughty. God knows it. The world knows it yet it's very unpopular to say it plainly.

God will give many of them their comeuppance. All who don't depart from their wicked ways and repent will be turned to dust. You and I won't see it, but it will be done. Ezekiel 38.

I do have to give props to the IDF. They pulled off one of the greatest acts of war with their pager assault. Beep beep BOOM! They don't need help from other nations; they can do it all on their own.

Catullus was a fine poet. About a year ago I downloaded a collection of all his poems.

Women are a frustrating species, especially modern women. Raping and beating women is not a good way to get what you want out of them for the following reasons:

1. You're breaking laws in most countries. End result; you may end up in jail.

2. Women are largely angry. If you further anger them, they may lash out; poison your food, piss in your coffee, sleep with your best friend, etc.

3. You may be able to break the spirit of a woman by raping and beating her, but you'll never get from her; loyalty, love, respect, kindness, etc.

There are other reasons why raping and beating women are not good strategies, I just hit a few highlights.

To get what you want out of a modern woman, many of whom are self centered, histrionic, and damaged, you must treat them with complete utter indifference.

Indifference is worse than being beaten or raped to many women. They'd literally do anything to receive attention from a man up to and including being raped and or beaten.

You can't be jailed for being indifferent.

Hope this helps. 😉

I remember many of your old videos that are now gone. The one where you were eating foie gras, or the one you made entirely on your side. You laughed maniacally. I laughed my ass off. Wish there was a way for you to publish them again.