Avatar
Sarah⚡️
2a52dbc35240b2d407743ef53047b5815425dded3798b710a9b7cbb28c2a7175
New on Nostr 🗽🇺🇸 🇫🇷 🇨🇭 Polymath | Polygloth | Mental Cogsec |Soul sec | Xenoterrestrial Anthropology and Defense😝 | ₿ |26

Drop some of the #Nostr unspoken etiquettes in the comment ⬇️ Zap the one you agree with

Or any tips / Faq

#asknostr

Very Legit ! the scam part is how often you need to go , go to someone who won’t try to turn you to a subscriber

A society that accelerates technologically without strengthening its moral foundation isn’t truly advancing it’s just becoming better at deception, manipulation, and self-destruction.

Intelligence without integrity doesn’t create a better world it just makes corruption more efficient.

Many people assume that moral progress is always forward movement but if a society is moving away from foundational truths, progress actually requires turning back. True, advanced values are not just about moving forward, but moving in the right direction.

Breaking : trump EO naming all the countries located south of America : South America

Replying to Avatar Humphrey

🫡

OSHA would have a heart attack looking at this picture

Replying to Avatar Stella Assange

Julian Assange explains the 2025 USAID debacle, eleven years ago:

‘The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.

This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades.

Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming "civil society" into a buyer's market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm's length. The last forty years have seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.

It is not just obvious neocon front groups like Foreign Policy Initiative. It also includes fatuous Western NGOs like Freedom House, where naïve but well-meaning career nonprofit workers are twisted in knots by political funding streams, denouncing non-Western human rights violations while keeping local abuses firmly in their blind spots.

The civil society conference circuit—which flies developing-world activists across the globe hundreds of times a year to bless the unholy union between "government and private stakeholders" at geopoliticized events like the "Stockholm Internet Forum"—simply could not exist if it were not blasted with millions of dollars in political funding annually…’

Text from Sep 2014, before he was imprisoned in Belmarsh. Extracted from his book, “When Google Met WikiLeaks”. Full text and images for the first chapter are available for free here:

https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/

A lot of well-meaning, talented people who could genuinely transform society get trapped in the NGO circus circuit, their revolutionary energy slowly redirected into bureaucracy. The civil society is structured not to amplify dissent, but to absorb and neutralize it before it ever becomes effective . The best way to control opposition isn’t to crush it it’s to fund it, professionalize it, and make it part of the system

USAID perfected the game , by picking every movement under the sun even if it’s some ridiculous movement like giving trans kids around the world access to pet chickens , or causes that are directly against US national security and against the personal interest of the Soros type funding it , it doesn’t matter . Because down the line, no matter what the movement originally stood for, it can be steered, diluted, or repurposed to serve a different agenda.

One moment, they’re advocating for gender equality in some country, and before they know it, they’re involved in an armed movement to overthrow their own government, completely unaware of how they got there.

One moment, they’re standing up for woman rights, and the next, they’re in the middle of a staged provocation with some conveniently timed police crackdown that gets blasted all over international media, causing just the right amount of outrage to justify a U.S.-backed intervention.

Sometimes all you need is a chunky cat to cuddle with

Inverse Bryan Johnsson would be tanning like a retired floridian , eating like a racoon with a credit card and having a REM sleep chart that looks like an earthquake seismograph

They have insane amount of guaranteed disposable income and they don’t need to reinvest it , so they just blow it

Nop I think your assigned chinese spy / spirit guide is trying to tell you something