So, the OP-RETURN debate - the present argument is an interesting one. Up until now, all data storage options historically have been impermanent. What happens if your daughter or son is raped, filmed and then that data is stored permanently on the blockchain? From what I understand, this is a possibility. Is it a probability? Has this happened on other blockchains with greater storage limits? If so, what were the consequences?

I thought that inefficient mining companies going bankrupt over time was a feature, not a bug.

Fair do’s. Time will tell I guess.

Fair play, though since the GFC, everyday practices exist now that they wouldn’t have dreamt of in the 70s. In relation to the bond market, looking back at the Truss effect, it seems to me that printing increases even more when the market starts to slide no?

The UK prints its own money, hence IMF bailout would never happen. Don’t believe the hype.

Try not to spread more divide. If you want to know about child abuse in the UK, ask a British person. Every American seems to think that it’s only brown people that abuse children over here and then keep spreading the same division and hate. If you want to know about child abuse in the UK, start with Jimmy Saville (our very own satanic Epstein), his relationship with people such as the Yorkshire Ripper, and his relationship to the royal family. Then look into Mountbatten, Ted Heath, Cyril Smith. Then look at half of Thatchers cabinet and advisers in the eighties, some of whom were members of PIE. Then look at the coverups that then proceeded for the next 3 decades. Horrific child abuse has been and is still being carried out, and constantly kept hidden by very wealthy, white men with lots of power. Our press is a cesspit of shit, owned by those same white men with power. The example that you refer to is one, amongst many others, that they like to single out for you. Don’t fall for it.