Avatar
vinney...axkl
2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331
Engineer at https://opennode.com --- Working on https://catallax.network - decentralized labor/bounty protocol and: https://attestr.app/ - mutual agreements signed on nostr Do you like sharing paywalled content to nostr? Install this extension: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/readtorelay/gfncdikmbmefjjbahjhgkodnhepikecj - https://github.com/vcavallo/ReadToRelay Order print books with bitcoin! https://whitepaperbooks.com

nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c you are doing a very commendable job of "Good Cop". But someone has to be "Bad Cop", and I volunteer.

What nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy is describing here is fine and good for a central server to provide, but it is simply contradictory and antithetical to decentralization. Decentralization and subjective experiences mean controlling what *you yourself* see and very specifically NOT controlling what others see if they didn't ask for this service. If I can dictate what notes other people can see (as replies to my posts, say), in a way that I have chosen and they have not (maybe they're following someone I have blocked and they don't see that person's note now) then I am superceding their desires of their experience and they don't own that experience any longer.

Controlling what others see is fine IF they asked for it (either explicitly or implicitly by using an app or protocol or visiting a user-owned website). It's even good, if that's what they want. I have no interest in - or even the ability to - control what clients people use and what content they provide to a group of users who voluntarily choose to allow someone else to control what they see.

This concept, as a "norm", goes in the opposite direction of the norms of decentralized, end-user-owned, subjective networked experiences. I'm not saying we shouldn't talk about it, but I am saying we should recognize very clearly what the topic of discussion is:

Who controls what you see? You, or a filtering agent? If the latter, did you explicitly ask for the filtering or not? If you didn't, and you can't supercede the filter yourself, you're operating in a controlled environment and you better be aware of it.

If that starts to happen transparently and without users' consent, you're headed right back to the hell we've all worked to undo.

nostr:nevent1qqs8dhdzvhq42ymr8k9aw56lrehjh7q6zhv4fkxjzad0gxh5p3k8lhcpr3mhxue69uh5ummnw3ezucmvda6kgtnkd9hxuete9eu8j7szyqe4dhnpkwty0ycuazepgzet4wphuzqscrh4zka7jt0qyjqypw9a6qcyqqqqqqglvk36h

There is no system - existent or future - that can prevent all people (with varying tastes and comfort levels) from ever seeing anything that is "unwanted" by each of them. Except for eyelids. But then you still have sound to worry about.

If you think about this for even 1 minute it's a very obvious property of reality. Not just social media.

Your only option is to use intensely-restrictive relays for read. I'm sorry that your desire isn't satisfyable in any other way on Nostr, but that's just how it is

Replying to Avatar brugeman

Block may mean many things.

If block is "blocked people can't see your content" then sure it's just not possible on a public internet.

If block is "blocked people can't comment on your content" (which was mentioned in your quote) then it's not that simple. Website do have various forms of blocking (for comments, posting etc). Of course that doesn't "block" someone from commenting elsewhere and linking to your post, but that's a different thing.

It's almost like people feel "ownership" of their posts, and when someone replies, they almost feel like people have posted "on their space". So even muting doesn't feel like enough, they want no one to see bad stuff "on their space" (in replies). They feel as if they were talking in a some cosy space and then someone intruded with their bad stuff. You'd be upset IRL if someone interrupted your conversation with some BS, even if your conversation was happening "on a town square". IRL you could tell the intruder to get off or you could go away and stop the conversation, but it's not possible online - they can keep yelling at you forever and can invite friends, etc.

Maybe muting feels like not enough because if everyone can see how you're not responding (if you muted them) then everyone might think "if he has nothing to say then maybe their BS has merit". If you muted and not responding then for others it feels like you just have nothing to say, and that's not true. Maybe if there was a marker visible like "this person is muted by the person he's replying to so take that into account" it would help everyone understand the situation better and the urge for "blocking" would be lower.

Anyway, it's definitely a mismatch btw what's possible online and offline. You wouldn't let some idiot follow you in all public spaces IRL and yell at you, you'd punch them or call police. Or you would at least try to let everyone around know that you're actively ignoring the idiot. But what can you do online?

There's no reason you _should_ be able to stop people from commenting on your notes. Those are *their* notes, so of course they can write them. They're not *ON* "your" note. They're ABOUT it. Surely you're not saying people should get to control the topics and references others are allowed to discuss.

nostr:nevent1qqsxtdmp7rdrpzn09t6k544lqn9r23pg847d6uwge6pxm9fcepm6wxspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqv6kmesm89j8jvww3vs5pv46hqm7pqgvpm63twlf9hszfqzqhz7aqvzqqqqqqyxex4vj

Replying to Avatar brugeman

Block may mean many things.

If block is "blocked people can't see your content" then sure it's just not possible on a public internet.

If block is "blocked people can't comment on your content" (which was mentioned in your quote) then it's not that simple. Website do have various forms of blocking (for comments, posting etc). Of course that doesn't "block" someone from commenting elsewhere and linking to your post, but that's a different thing.

It's almost like people feel "ownership" of their posts, and when someone replies, they almost feel like people have posted "on their space". So even muting doesn't feel like enough, they want no one to see bad stuff "on their space" (in replies). They feel as if they were talking in a some cosy space and then someone intruded with their bad stuff. You'd be upset IRL if someone interrupted your conversation with some BS, even if your conversation was happening "on a town square". IRL you could tell the intruder to get off or you could go away and stop the conversation, but it's not possible online - they can keep yelling at you forever and can invite friends, etc.

Maybe muting feels like not enough because if everyone can see how you're not responding (if you muted them) then everyone might think "if he has nothing to say then maybe their BS has merit". If you muted and not responding then for others it feels like you just have nothing to say, and that's not true. Maybe if there was a marker visible like "this person is muted by the person he's replying to so take that into account" it would help everyone understand the situation better and the urge for "blocking" would be lower.

Anyway, it's definitely a mismatch btw what's possible online and offline. You wouldn't let some idiot follow you in all public spaces IRL and yell at you, you'd punch them or call police. Or you would at least try to let everyone around know that you're actively ignoring the idiot. But what can you do online?

There's no reason you _should_ be able to stop people from commenting on your notes. Those are *their* notes, so of course they can write them. They're not *ON* "your" note. They're ABOUT it. Surely you're not saying people should get to control the topics and references others are allowed to discuss.

Mute is the only option. Deal with it.

Probably need tagged relays eh? I might want to get "product notes" from 5 big retail relays but see zero "text notes" from them.

I suppose you could just handle that in the client but that seems wrong

They're around. I don't really post about Bitcoin much, but I do post a lot about technology and anarcho-capitalism :/

Discoveryability is tough on Nostr. If you see someone writing about non-bitcoin stuff, check their feed, see who they've reposted, follow them all; rinse and repeat. Eventually you'll get a more heterogeneous collection

Man, I remember when a dime bag cost 150 sats

I tried to find a picture of stonehenge without the stones so I could reply and caption it "Zerohenge" but I failed. take this text reply instead.

I was just DMing with an #ancap on twitter (he's not on nostr yet) and suddenly my messages won't load nor the main feed.

Definitely not interesting...