Better explanation here: nostr:nevent1qqsz7r6acy9e9gzlf7kcf29hyyw3nrd5uyx4uk8sx0cna2vs3sfjzgspr3mhxue69uh5ummnw3ezucmvda6kgtnkd9hxuete9eu8j7szyqh04fc4hw6xm4d7dd7634msqfndz9n5hyfms9u2mk6u9e3anpenzqcyqqqqqqgjkh8fp
Do what you want wrt filtering, blocking, discomfort, etc. But do it very obviously and with user consent if you want to avoid stumbling blindfolded back into dystopia.
nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c you are doing a very commendable job of "Good Cop". But someone has to be "Bad Cop", and I volunteer.
What nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy is describing here is fine and good for a central server to provide, but it is simply contradictory and antithetical to decentralization. Decentralization and subjective experiences mean controlling what *you yourself* see and very specifically NOT controlling what others see if they didn't ask for this service. If I can dictate what notes other people can see (as replies to my posts, say), in a way that I have chosen and they have not (maybe they're following someone I have blocked and they don't see that person's note now) then I am superceding their desires of their experience and they don't own that experience any longer.
Controlling what others see is fine IF they asked for it (either explicitly or implicitly by using an app or protocol or visiting a user-owned website). It's even good, if that's what they want. I have no interest in - or even the ability to - control what clients people use and what content they provide to a group of users who voluntarily choose to allow someone else to control what they see.
This concept, as a "norm", goes in the opposite direction of the norms of decentralized, end-user-owned, subjective networked experiences. I'm not saying we shouldn't talk about it, but I am saying we should recognize very clearly what the topic of discussion is:
Who controls what you see? You, or a filtering agent? If the latter, did you explicitly ask for the filtering or not? If you didn't, and you can't supercede the filter yourself, you're operating in a controlled environment and you better be aware of it.
If that starts to happen transparently and without users' consent, you're headed right back to the hell we've all worked to undo.
But also not as nuanced and complicated as you think
Not only is it "a hard problem" and "not what you were thinking of", it's also a bad idea (for a social networking client).
Maybe for a personal blog or something it would make sense for a client to not show notes inline that reference the original post. But I'm not convinced a relayed-note protocol is even the right choice for a personal blog anyway.
There is no system - existent or future - that can prevent all people (with varying tastes and comfort levels) from ever seeing anything that is "unwanted" by each of them. Except for eyelids. But then you still have sound to worry about.
If you think about this for even 1 minute it's a very obvious property of reality. Not just social media.
Your only option is to use intensely-restrictive relays for read. I'm sorry that your desire isn't satisfyable in any other way on Nostr, but that's just how it is
There's no reason you _should_ be able to stop people from commenting on your notes. Those are *their* notes, so of course they can write them. They're not *ON* "your" note. They're ABOUT it. Surely you're not saying people should get to control the topics and references others are allowed to discuss.
There's no reason you _should_ be able to stop people from commenting on your notes. Those are *their* notes, so of course they can write them. They're not *ON* "your" note. They're ABOUT it. Surely you're not saying people should get to control the topics and references others are allowed to discuss.
Mute is the only option. Deal with it.
Probably need tagged relays eh? I might want to get "product notes" from 5 big retail relays but see zero "text notes" from them.
I suppose you could just handle that in the client but that seems wrong
You have one of the strangest Nostr histories I've ever seen.
I follow you
Help this guy!
(Meant to quote this one in my previous note.)
help this guy, people!
nostr:note1pvefcdzq25z3v3upnmhu4ea3dwp0tmu2hng6gr862jxf07w03wlqe03and
They're around. I don't really post about Bitcoin much, but I do post a lot about technology and anarcho-capitalism :/
Discoveryability is tough on Nostr. If you see someone writing about non-bitcoin stuff, check their feed, see who they've reposted, follow them all; rinse and repeat. Eventually you'll get a more heterogeneous collection
Man, I remember when a dime bag cost 150 sats

I tried to find a picture of stonehenge without the stones so I could reply and caption it "Zerohenge" but I failed. take this text reply instead.
I was just DMing with an #ancap on twitter (he's not on nostr yet) and suddenly my messages won't load nor the main feed.
Definitely not interesting...
