?cid=9b38fe91jx3yrotzgk54f0e23fnst8hyulv8pripko9aw6uj&ep=v1_gifs_trending&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
nostr:note1ecumveflrgyffgvp73mpgyk5a59k3wrprnajzxujnvvqsvm6y4pspl900v
nostr 2.0 😂 🐸 
that’s what i’ve been saying. give him a gm and he’ll move on.
😂 he’s just a lonely guy looking for a friend to reply 🤣
it depends on how you define spam and network disruption. if replyguy went around zapping everyone instead, would you call that disruptive? relays should implement the tools to minimize network disruption as they see fit. i love the point about fees, it’s a great tool to mitigate bad actors. if purple had a spam free relay, i’d use it! we’re all accustomed to paying for convenience. but it’s not my place to decide “who” or “what” gets a voice.
we don’t want spam. relays should be able to act as they please. but devil’s advocate - censorship (in any form) is censorship. i haven’t picked a side yet.
gm pv 🤙 new word, new day. it almost got me too.
playing with ai. lol
umbrel and start9 are great but costly. a nuc or any minipc will do the trick for less than $200.