Avatar
shinobi
2f9515f9412761cc3f59e082fd477bb0b9fbe1550c019f347963426cdde97b70

Toccata and fugue in D minor or perhaps Verdi's Dies Irae.

If it's the end of the world then the second one for sure!

1 Corinthians 2:1-2 KJVA “And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

So there's this thing - as Christians in theory at least we should agree on most things - speak one Truth in love. Yet oftentimes it's quite different - we all disagree on something whether it's baptism, tithing, Calvinism, original sin, Bible versions, women preaching, eucharist etc.

Yet by focusing on such details we sometimes forget the most important part - the gospel. The salvation. So, especially with strangers - make sure they are saved first and know the gospel.

From the verse above we can see Paul's laser like focus on the gospel.

To my personal surprise - many Christians couldn't formulate it clearly. So to follow my own advice here it is again:

1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJVA “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

No problem. From our disagreement we both can learn more. Since we both take different positions we can't be both right. We can be both wrong though heh.

It's a good opportunity to work on polishing our knowledge and conviction, and thank you for doing it in a polite and civilized manner.

Our question of canon is really only about the NT canon, correct?

Old testament scriptures were all revealed and acknowledged as such long before Jesus was born.

And they are inspired by God. Since the writers even wrote that God told them to write

Deuteronomy 31:9 KJVA “¶And Moses wrote this law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi, which bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord, and unto all the elders of Israel.”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

Isaiah 8:1 KJVA “Moreover the Lord said unto me, Take thee a great roll, and write in it with a man's pen concerning Maher–shalal–hash–baz.”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

Notice how Isaiah even writes down that God told him to write down - words of God are all precious and we can learn from everyone of them.

Here we can learn as throughout the whole old testament is that God wanted us to write things down - not an oral tradition but a written tradition.

Before the council of Nicaea it was already known what's scripture and what's not scripture.

Your question is difficult to answer since I can't go ask them about it. But the gospels and epistles were there and recognized as inspired writings. And used as such (copied and disseminated).

Replying to Avatar EchDel

I agree that there is text which is considered canon by churches and institutions. You are claiming that the Bible is canonised by God. I say that the Bible was canonised by men.

You claim that the Bible was written by God.

I claim that it is a compilation of books written by different men, over a long period of time. Sometimes they are recording the speech of God and sometimes they are recording the events of their lives. Sometimes it's poetry and sometimes it's prophecy.

The first book of the new testament is commonly referred to as, the gospel according to Matthew. It was important for Matthew to be the author of his testimony otherwise he would not be considered a credible witness.

If you say the book was written by God through Matthew you are implying that the manuscript is true on merit of it's source and not on merit of it's content.

This tactic of exalting a book by canonization I believe is because an institution wants to exert authoritative power over individual humans and that they should not be allowed to question that authority.

The power of the truth lies not only in the believing of it but in the understanding of it also. To understand something you must be willing to stress and challenge it to see where it's limits and capacity lies. When it comes to testing the veracity of knowledge we should not fear contention.

Only problem is you are a heretic as soon as you suggest that the earth orbits the sun and not vice versa.

Challenging consensus with hubris and pride means there is a hidden agenda and evil intent. Challenging consensus with sincere concern or perhaps greater insight is honest and useful.

And yes - I do believe that the Bible is authoritative because it's the word of God.

There are actually a lot of other smart books written, on morals, life, history etc.

But neither of them carries the same authority as the Bible. And the Bible is unique in this regard as it is the ONLY authority for a Christian.

Once you choose books based on what you deem good or correct and not on their source - you can have multiple authorities. Not a single, trustworthy authority.

Replying to Avatar EchDel

I agree that there is text which is considered canon by churches and institutions. You are claiming that the Bible is canonised by God. I say that the Bible was canonised by men.

You claim that the Bible was written by God.

I claim that it is a compilation of books written by different men, over a long period of time. Sometimes they are recording the speech of God and sometimes they are recording the events of their lives. Sometimes it's poetry and sometimes it's prophecy.

The first book of the new testament is commonly referred to as, the gospel according to Matthew. It was important for Matthew to be the author of his testimony otherwise he would not be considered a credible witness.

If you say the book was written by God through Matthew you are implying that the manuscript is true on merit of it's source and not on merit of it's content.

This tactic of exalting a book by canonization I believe is because an institution wants to exert authoritative power over individual humans and that they should not be allowed to question that authority.

The power of the truth lies not only in the believing of it but in the understanding of it also. To understand something you must be willing to stress and challenge it to see where it's limits and capacity lies. When it comes to testing the veracity of knowledge we should not fear contention.

Only problem is you are a heretic as soon as you suggest that the earth orbits the sun and not vice versa.

Challenging consensus with hubris and pride means there is a hidden agenda and evil intent. Challenging consensus with sincere concern or perhaps greater insight is honest and useful.

Then we have different positions.

Because only the author can say what's canon and what's outside of it.

And yes, different people wrote different things, but it was everything that God wanted us to have. He inspired those men to write it.

Men are fallible, God is not and as such we can only trust God's word not men's words.

So to have this thing so very important to our faith - a book (and remember even Job back in the day lamented he didn't have one) that teaches us about God, tells us his wish and his plan and that let's truth speak for itself.

https://nostpic.com/media/2f9515f9412761cc3f59e082fd477bb0b9fbe1550c019f347963426cdde97b70/90c958e813d0403af72e0bc7a36d4ad9c240f014d12ddd3168d4cb87e61a5373.webp

RECIPE NEEDED!

Got this bad boy. It's half a young goat, organic and grass fed.

But no Idea how to cook it.

Does anyone here knows how to cook goat meat?

#carnivore #meat #meatstr

It doesn't matter at this stage which one, first we need to agree or disagree that there is a canon, a scripture from God to us. Then we can try to identify it.

Let's not skip steps.

Do you see the necessity for the existence of such a canon, and that it could have only be decided by God and created by God and serve specific purpises like instruction, illumination, edification etc.

2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJVA “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

I am having a conversation here on nostr with a person who doubts we have the real canon of scriptures. And I mean it's easy to say such things, since the world tells us this all the time...it started in the garden of Eden with "yea, did God say..." And this attack and onslaught is ongoing now since the beginning of the creation.

But God did give us a book. Since Moses he commanded us to write his words, to keep and to preserve them (each king of Israel had to make his own copy of the law).

The purpose was to preserve what he wants us to know for future generations, to make the man of God perfect.

So when we have the Bible it's not a book men wrote. They just provided the pen. God provided the words.

#bible #christianity #bibleverse #scripture #Jesus #God #KJV

Replying to Avatar EchDel

With regards to Paul his writings are inspirational, his reasoning is sound, his logic solid.

I believe that he was led by the holy spirit in his quest.

Paul would not have liked it if people used his writings as a hammer to beat people into uniformity of thought and opinion with regards to the sincere search of truth. That is why he commended the Bereans and that is why he spoke of the liberty we have in Christ.

Scripture was not yet canonized when these writings were written. The "holiness" of scripture could be comprimised by the compilation of texts into a canon.

That is why certain books are included and others excluded, I do not attribute this effort to God but to men who use their reasoning faculties and historic knowledge to try with best intent to compile scriptures for record, edification and historic preservation.

We can claim it is canonized by God but we cannot prove it. That is why we must lean on truth discovery through knowledge of the written word, which we must examine critically, because truth does not fear criticism or investigation because through-out this process we discover it to be even more true than we originally had hoped or believed. Trancending truth from faith to certainty. Milk to meat.

So if I challenge scripture it is not to defy it though it may appear to be the case.

It is to challenge the ones who thought they had a sure footing and to throught the argumentative process see if we can discover something we had not taken into consideration before.

Scriptures must be canonized by God for several reasons. And we assume here that God is loving and just.

1. He's the author, which means that he's the one responsible for writing and defining the canon.

2. Everyone will be judged by those scriptures at some point. He can't judge you fairly if you don't have the whole canon or one with mistakes - that wouldn't be just.

3. God promised to preserve his wors into eternity - not one jot or tittle would be lost.

4. We need his word for spiritual growth and he gave it to us - hiding it or taking it away makes no sense.

Now obviously Satan wants us to believe we have lost it, never had it, it's unclear etc.

But it's not.

We have today the word of God in the scriptures. and can use and profit from it.

I think that you might mean a different thing when you say inspiration then me

Let me clarify: when I say inspiration I mean that it's breathed by God, it's his wirds that the writers of the books wrote dow . what he wanted them to write down.

Is that the same way you use the word?

OK, thank you. So I don't quite understand your issue with scripture only?

Could you point out it? Because to me as a scripture only believer it seems very basic and logical and also supported by the scripture itself.

Hello everyone! I hope you are all doing great and will have a wonderful weekend!

Bible verse of the day is

Colossians 2:8-10 KJVA “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

Never forget that we are complete in Jesus. And to be complete means to lack nothing.

So whatever happens to you to make you think that something lacks in your life always remember this - you are complete in Jesus and you lack nothing.

#bible #biblestr #bibleverse #God #Jesus #faith #complete #christianity

Thanks to Jesus. Glad to read about your story. Thank you for sharing! It totally makes sense.

Many people are like you in this regard. They became Christians because of Jesus and the gospel, and then they strayed away because of Christians or the church they joined, or they never had a solid doctrinal foundation.

And after becoming spiritual not religious and exploring all the other options out there they realize that only Jesus saves and he's the answer to all the questions. He is our Lord and God. We are in him and we are complete in him, we lack nothing with him.

That's because he's the true God. The other religions or faitha can't give you that, because they are man-made.

Anyway, thanks for sharing!

Even though it's AI it's still a cute video, and I usually don't watch them. But watched this one haha the bear is cute!