Avatar
cadayton
30b99916a16004e23c93cef20d06f85974e9043fe88bc1b7c4500f8b3cc6e3fe
BTC 100% and going down the Lightning and Golang rabbit hole.

Hopefully, everyone knows to do the opposite what he recommends. In fact anything coming from the main stream media these days should be considered false until proven true.

Its beyond me how someone can fuck up so much and still keep their job. The only answer that makes sense is that he is following orders.

Good time to do any needed onchain transactions.

Check out this cool nostr share button!

https://nub.coracle.social

One New Year's resolution done by updating BTC software stack to current versions. Next is GrapheneOS implementation.

Recently, installed the Block Site extension to remind me to avoid certain places.

Maybe it is just me. But, I think it is important that people in the US need to understand that our forefathers establish a value base monetary system (the gold standard) because they were fully aware of the issues with a fiat based monetary system. This all changed in 1913 when a group of bankers created the federal reserve and shortly thereafter the 16th amendment was pasted. If we ignore our history, then we are doomed to repeat it.

Interesting Gallup poll. Glad to see Americans are finally waking up. One should find it interesting that in the main media RFK Jr is rarely mentioned. This is another strong indicator how the main stream media is captured and unable to provide non-bias information.

Our responsibility in a government for the people by the people is to do more than just vote. I understand that the politicians no longer represents the interest of the people which makes it difficult to think voting has any value.

I'm at the cross roads too, but standing by and doing nothing isn't a solution either.

By being a Bitcoiner you are taking action in the right direction and are voting for sound money. So we need to support those in anyway we can that support sound money (freedom).

Lastly we need to stop supporting those who don't support freedom.

There are a host of corporation who mandated the JAB as a condition of employment. None of those companies will ever see another dime from me.

This is why we need to all we can to get RFK Jr. on the ballot.

Biden is a puppet clown and a big embarrassment.

Trump has the right ideas but is filled with hate and anger.

RFK Jr. a person truly wanting to address our issues and represent the people's will. The only issue is can one good person make a difference in the presents of so much evil. There is only one way to find out.

TRUE. Just making the point I would NOT believe the main stream media if they said the sky is blue.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

On Lincoln

----------------

Lincoln wasn't a good president. He wasn't even a mediocre president. He was a terrible president. He suspended individual rights. He massively expanded the government through money printing. He led millions of people to their deaths. All for power.

What we learn in school is that he was the great emancipator, ending slavery and winning a war that had to be won. That he was some man of genius and virtue, thrust upon the national stage at the right time to progress history.

Such is the result of the history being written by the winners. Similar hagiographies have been written about FDR and even Woodrow Wilson. But like the news, much of history is spun to manipulate us. Most of conventional history is fake and even a cursory study of what actually happened is enough to make you question how virtuous they were, and why they made the decisions they did. Almost always, you find that they were opportunistic cowards that did what would cost them least, even at the expense of the people they affected.

History is a tricky topic because the counterfactuals are always very speculative. But what we can judge is the values played out in actions taken, and in that sense, Lincoln was pretty terrible. He suspended habeas corpus, he cheated in border state elections to keep them in the union, and he massively, massively expanded the scope, power and size of government through inflationary theft.

It's hard to imagine what things were like before Lincoln, because before him, was a string of single-term Jacksonian, hard-money Democrat presidents. This was back when liberal meant being for personal liberty and that era of government before 1860 was insanely small, about 2% of the GDP. He would oversee an unprecedented expansion which would take the government to 20%.

Much of it, was, of course, because of the Civil War, and the popular narrative is that he needed to wage that war to end slavery. And yes, the issue was a major one in that era, but the elimination of slavery was more of a lucky by-product than an aim. His main goal, as he stated over and over again and as acted out in his policies, was to preserve the union, not to end slavery.

In preserving the union, he destroyed the idea that states had the right of secession, he weakened the idea of natural rights and he stole through inflation and sent many to their deaths. The centralizing of the federal government, the behemoth that we live with today began during his heyday.

The main thing that preserved his legacy was his assassination. Had a couple of battles gone the wrong way in 1863 and 1864, he wouldn't have been re-elected and he would have disappeared into the annals of history as a political amateur that lucked into the presidency in 1860 and screwed things up for 4 years. Instead, he was re-elected, assassinated and the horrific legacy of reconstruction was blamed on others. In short, he died at the right time.

There are those, of course, that will argue that Lincoln would have done things differently, and that he would have been more merciful to the south and rebuilt things as to spare them the suffering. But that's inconsistent with everything he did. Like most politicians he was a power grabber and he did what was politically expedient and not what was virtuous or right. He suspended habeas corpus (needing a reason to arrest and detain people)! He made generals do what would make him look good so he would get elected, not what would save the most lives or win the war the quickest. He created the greenback, which was a form of money printing to finance the war. And he spent an insane sum of other peoples' money through implicit and explicit taxes to "preserve the union."

Ending slavery, of course, was a big deal and in the annals of history, it's a dark mark in the history of the US that the institution survived so long. And yes, the Civil War did end it, but that wasn't the objective of the war itself.

Being Republican, he had a large Radical wing that he had to deal with and they wanted abolition, and later full voting rights for blacks. Because the south had seceded, they had the votes to pass the constitutional amendments, though only toward the end of the war when it was clear the north would win. That was a political expediency that ended up defining his legacy. But really, it's his biographers and historians of the winning side that have spun him to be a hero, when he was anything but.

The big flaw of Lincoln is that he created an unnecessary war that cost millions of lives and billions of dollars, one that set back the US by decades. Letting the south secede and revoking the Fugitive Slave Act would have ended the institution just as well, for much less cost. And this isn't idle speculation. Brazil had the second largest slave population in the 19th century that was whittled down quickly because the slaves had northern provinces where they could escape. The price of slaves dropped dramatically and soon, the institution itself was destroyed through economic means, not martial ones.

What's worse about Lincoln's legacy is that he set a precedent for federal power that brought forth the progressive era and eventually to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. The centralization of federal power began with him.

Lincoln wasn't a good president. But the history is written by the winners and they have made a secular saint out of him.

The cause for wars are typically religious, territorial, or economically based. The civil war was about economics between the north and south and the slavery issue was just an attention diversion.

We are all slaves today to the fiat systems, so likely time for another major war.