Congrats bro!
I just had to draw a QR code by hand! π
That was kinda difficult, but I'm enjoying my Jade so far!
Wait till you need to scan a signed tx with a shitty laptop camera. I have issues every time, but I always seem to get it to scan eventually. Good luck!
Don't think so. Maybe nostr:npub1fmunwy3lljfyzlgyuyman79lxwm4efz6pzlgqjwc400pr9l708qquvje8w is what you seek?
Oh nice! I have actually been looking for something like this π
Yea maybe. I think I'm unsuccessfully trying to point out that it's hard for non devs to identify legit projects that deserve funding, while also pointing out that it's impossible that only 9 people can bring totally unbiased opinions on funding. Is there a way to decentralize it more without having to go all the way down to the individual project level?
Anyone willing to help me build a simple Bitcoin only e-commerce website with BTC Pay Server integration via voltage.cloud ?
I already have the on-chain and lightning setup in BTC Pay Server, but would like a nice front end website for my products.
Will pay in sats, DM me for details or to quote me a price.
#asknostr
Right now, when I donate to opensats I'm outsourcing the vetting of the projects and letting them decide which projects get different amounts of funding.
I'm not a dev and I can't review all the projects, so I have lass of an issue trusting them to vet projects. But if people have concerns with board members choosing the level of funding, that is something we could empower individuals to decide, right?
Or maybe even by category. Like what if I want to donate to fedimint projects only, or only new LDK features (Bolt12), or only new lightning mobile wallets. This would also help with the latest Saylor FUD... Have a no protocol changes fund, or a layer 2 only fund.
Just brainstorming really though. Contributing to FOSS projects is literally mission critical to the future of Bitcoin. We need to make sure that aspect of Bitcoin remains as decentralized as possible. Just throwing out ideas.
I honestly believe that we are all trying to do the right thing here, but I agree that the distribution of opensats grants could be better.
nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx or nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc how feasible would it be to allow donations to be made to either the general opensats fund or an opensats project of our choosing?
Do you think that would help nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s
No air quotes needed. Bitcoin is decentralized.
6 blocks till difficulty adjustment, although I don't think it'll be enough to get us back to 4/20 in many places. I expect hash will continue to rip to get the last of the 6.25 blocks.
I realize I'm pretty late to this party (assumed it wouldn't persist this long) but I am also now Dan π
All MSM sources have lost the public's trust.
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/09/1243755769/npr-journalist-uri-berliner-trust-diversity
Fair enough, GMπ΅π
GM nostr β PV π
You all are my *kind* of people π«

GM nostr β PV π

My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who said Saylor pressured an ETF not to fund Bitcoin devs.
π
Are you really a Bitcoiner if you have never burned your seed phrase recovery sheet after stamping it into metal? π
#asknostr
Preferably on 4/20... during the halving π€