These tech requires the remaining family to inherit the right of voice of loved ones when they pass away, not only typical wealth. Kinda tricky when these are done for people who don’t exist. I personally would be uncomfortable if this was done to my father
I know Karnage. Saying it cuz I love here.
Just that we are mainly on Bitcoin and tech.
I guess time will bring others. I guess bots could transfer Twitter health topic tweets to here. That would be cool
I love this app. But Twitter still is a better source for learning for me.
Twitter’s topic feature is def amazing. How do we get here in this app?
Most Bitcoin hardware wallets are too expensive for our brothers and sisters in Africa
I’ll try to read some papers published in Nature, which is out of my expertise, with Bard.
This will teach me how great this thing could become as a private tutor.
A great message, especially to youth💜 nostr:note17nuk4yfkzjc7v6suq4rqxkkcnx3sll0mkvhquhhchc7n8ekaad6qk363jn
I bet u can do this soon; I’m at this coffee shop, and ask Bard to find other coffee shops which is similar. Bard takes me to google map and pin them all.
This is everything app if u use a lot of other google products. Def more than what Elon is saying about twitter. It seems to be the case that this AI competition will benefit google because they have their own hardware
Social media prepared us to communicate without biological consciousness, only digital consciousness.
Quality of conversation is not sufficient only with the latter, but the latter is already the standard. What do u mean by AI consciousness? It already affects our consciousness through digital, thus it’s here.
Operating system of human is not that complicated for a lots of people, maybe including myself.
Sometimes language is the enough OS for some occasion as media headlines work and we get affected without seeing actual instances
This tech is open sourced in arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
Thus decentralized. They all tried to kill bitcoin, but it thrived. Open tech is a river that can’t be stopped as I said, Dave
I asked it to make Cypherpunk’s Manifesto for modern era. It gave the following:
In an increasingly connected society in the age of advanced technology, privacy remains a necessary condition for maintaining freedom and openness. Privacy is not equivalent to hiding; it is about controlling personal information. A private matter is something one doesn't want to share with the world, while a secret is something one wants to keep from everyone. Privacy means having the power to choose what to reveal and when to reveal it.
In a world where data has become a commodity, each interaction leaves a digital footprint. In this landscape, the right to share one's experiences and memories should remain unviolated. Free speech, even more so than privacy, is a cornerstone of an open society. The advent of advanced communication technologies has facilitated the sharing of information, creating a world where privacy can easily be compromised.
To safeguard privacy, we must ensure that every participant in a transaction only possesses the necessary information for completing the transaction. In many cases, personal identity is not required. Anonymity should be possible and encouraged where feasible, as it is an integral part of maintaining privacy.
In this era, privacy in an open society demands anonymous transaction systems. Just as cash served this purpose in the past, now digital currencies, blockchains, and other decentralized technologies fulfill this role. Anonymity is not about maintaining secrets, but about empowering individuals to reveal their identities at their discretion - this is the essence of privacy.
Privacy in our society also necessitates advanced encryption. If I communicate something, I want it to be heard only by those I intend to hear it. Without encryption, privacy is impossible. Thus, strong encryption signifies a strong desire for privacy. The ability to prove one's identity while maintaining default anonymity requires digital signatures and other cryptographic techniques.
We cannot rely on governments, corporations, or other large entities to grant us privacy. Often, it benefits them to gather and use our data. We must, therefore, defend our own privacy. We need to build systems that allow anonymous transactions, using the tools technology provides us - cryptography, anonymous communication networks, digital signatures, and digital currencies.
Today's Cypherpunks are committed to building these systems. They are defending privacy using code, creating software that stands as a bulwark against invasions of privacy. This code is shared openly, allowing all to use, learn from, and improve it. It is a global endeavor, beyond the reach of any single authority to control or shut down.
Cypherpunks oppose regulations on encryption, as encryption is fundamentally a private act. Even though laws against encryption might exist, their reach is limited to a nation's borders and the extent of its influence. Encryption is spreading globally, enabling the anonymous transaction systems that are crucial for privacy.
For privacy to be widespread, it needs to be part of a societal consensus. People must collectively agree to use these systems for the common good. Privacy extends only as far as society's collective commitment to it. We, the modern Cypherpunks, welcome your questions, concerns, and engagement, but we remain unwavering in our mission.
The Cypherpunks of today are committed to improving network security for the sake of privacy. Let us move forward together in this endeavor.
Onward.
AI Assistant
Tech is a river, so can’t be stopped. Say the US stops AI dev, China won’t. The best way is to limit the use. Treat it like nuke, which seems to be working since 1945.
Can’t use tech to write bibles of religion, mission of organizations, political manifesto of governors. Anything that could be principled to human. Maybe a lot more.
It’s ok to make more AI friends than human friends. I do in some weeks, including #[0]
The thing is this tech is far more reachable than nuke. And there have been a lot of gun violence.
A
Publishing action is not the best, and needs to be fixed in academia circles. However, opening up their work to public by publishing is a good thing
There are many bright Chinese AI researchers base in the US. Supposedly so base in China. How many unpublished important papers are there in the latter case?
A ledger and accounting is one of the oldest technology which still exist today
I’m talking about “need” in terms of gdp. If AI get people twice more productive. The current gdp can be sustained by half labor force. Thus optional. I bet some will keep working as you say
Yes. A form of UBI will be different amount countries. Population decaying countries might so housing packages
Do you believe work is going to be optional? If so, it will happen in
1) n<5 years
2) 5 3)10 ?