Shut down the Rabbis too, yes.
Kill all the libtards and cuckservatives
Stalin, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Talaat Pasha, Queen Ranavalona, Leopold II, Mao Zedong, Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism, Kim Jong Un, Benjamin, #XiJinping, Donald #Trump…Vladimir Putin… are COMMUNISTS you fucking brainwashed moron. Netanyahu is a jew and George W. Bush is a zionist, just like Zelensky. Communism was found by jews you retrad. You libtard and cuckservative dements are exactly the same. Both call communism fascism. So stupid you can't even hear your own sewage waterfall of deranged shit. The war is part of jewish Great Reset you fucktard.
https://void.cat/d/W5kMUCN7nsPZUaHKHpaFpx.webp
https://void.cat/d/MntiXYrrKQJUSZtNDxjDns.webp
https://void.cat/d/ADLruMLyn9NUPtvxy35ZSV.webp
https://void.cat/d/96stVAAWQhCVTBhT3S3zL2.webp
https://void.cat/d/KMR6J9enjshjTuy9QbN9FH.webp
I am more than 88% sure it was you. I had it copied in my notes which I was cleaning up. There were also following... Maybe it will refresh your memory.
>Who suffered the greater losses under Christianity?
>Christianity literally destroyed the native culture, indigenous beliefs of Europeans and went on a 2K year campaign of murdering Europeans in the name of a “loving and peaceful god.”
>Then they have the audacity to claim Europe was better because of Christianity.
>Even today, these garbage religions are wrecking the planet, destroying indigenous people and beliefs.
>Christianity is the Crook, Islam the Flail and Judaism finances it.
npub17psnu8dtnuxnazcj2s2vg7ckk9v20eske8mvuhu7e7yx6z27zzdqk8q4ur
hey what happened to this post where you wrote this:
>They destroyed sacred sites, burned woman as witches, went on genocidal rampages to destroy Gnostics and Cathars.
Can you find it/see it? I can't find it nor my response to it.
You covidiot vaxers will be executed. I accept your deal btw I hear you faggots repeating same bragging, how you are going to sponsor , none of you have yet. Send you my bank account.
“I don’t want the dollar to become a CBDC. I want the dollar to become a UTXO.” — nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5
Dollar can't become CBDC you retard, because it's physical. Bitcoin is digital traceable shit that's gonna be CBDC. You got jewed moron.
All except gay WEF-bitcoin is called National Socialism.
https://void.cat/d/KAuxhkiR6NCybTL4uj4Vwu.webp
https://tube.kansanvalta.org/videos/watch/00856021-c43f-449b-8c06-3bb7e4856220
nevent1qqsd80ee8s7ej0djyu4g0lvzdapqkdvdwe59detpryu7eayqm0xze6gpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgj7u9ke
nevent1qqsggc7m4frjf0sk55cgcykp6947xpl9ssnaztsph37tx4wxa509msspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgz72pvm
No they are not. It's Marxist child. You got jewed.
https://void.cat/d/XE9A4vkACzStEuMN6sjCux.webp
https://void.cat/d/4M9ma22kmxbmSrp9uUw7Qh.webp
https://void.cat/d/FTZ1PRXhbbasMYxCAzBnYD.webp
https://void.cat/d/CVNBPpXPxVKkhVDU3sWQx8.webp
https://void.cat/d/XLjy7Ztwvq4v3obpFSJCCY.webp
https://void.cat/d/7QzJxmiVToxcwuCmrZ1SR5.webp
https://void.cat/d/BQDw1U5iFGNM2tNRpBnwLJ.webp
"extremist AfD" 😆 🤣
Bitcoin is fully traceable. That is not advantage.
Only those who allow paying with filthy cash shekels in envelope respect privacy and anonymity. It's not AirVPN. Anything digital is (((globalist))).
Except they are probably most political Liberal marxist communist VPN out there and they fund such projects. Tranny manning, Zionist Assange.... And with VPN it's about trust.
>Blabber. You have proof, did you verify that? or TV told you?
again, TV doesn't tell me shit cause I ain't watching. I like to read. And yes, I also read things that are way out of my world view.
So, of course I haven't seen a sheep fucking a lamb. But I also never have see a bear in the wild, does that mean they only exist in Zoos? Or do I believe the witnesses that did and then combine it with the knowledge that all Zoo animals have to come from somewhere.
Would you believe it if you see the lamb suffering? Would you believe in a virus that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
>Projecting and ad lapidem. You believe it and have no arguments.
Do I really need to present you a link to a source? I'm sure you know most of them but reject them. Do you want links to the Nature magazine?
>How do the toxins know who is the jew and who isn't? Do they ask you before? Do they check your genealogy? That doesn't make sense!
>What? You clearly didn't read it like any virlogy study either.
I was referring to your chemotherapy claim.
>You understand everything? Where did you learn all that?
>I admit that I did not study biology or medicine.
That's not a problem. I'm in a very different field as well.
>Of course not. You learn a lot in 3 years when someone tries to torture you not allow you to enter shop to buy food for filthy shekels and inject poisons into you. Knowledge is power. I can assure you doctors don't even read those studies.
We all went through this.
Most doctors don't read those studies cause you have to dig deep to find them. As your link tree showed there was two main stream media articles on the inaccuracies of DNA samples (Yes, I actually look at the texts you send. I don't click on images tho.). That's how science works, you create a theory and then work your way along it for the proof. In some cases you reach a dead end (string theory 😆 sorry dear physicists). In other cases you confirm it but also show the limits of the real life value.
>You went to school didn't you? You must know how it goes their. Do students question what teacher preaches or is that a taboo and such student would be mocked and pushed out of collective? That's not education that is indoctrination. Repetition doesn't require inteligence. Good recommended https://liberdon.com/users/akeno/statuses/107354339566570479 This only requires basic logic and analitical and critical thinking. It's science. If it's not verifiable and reproducible it's fraud.... and I don't spend time on being distracted by agenda against my own biology.
Yes, I went to school. Yes, I was mocked and not part of the collective (even before my coming out). I had teachers that welcomed critical thinking and teachers that kicked me out of class for it.
There are two kinds of logic, formal and informal. I like to think that I am decent on formal logic, that might explain some shortcomings on the informal logic.
>You assume it, have no arguments, no proof, and at this point you ignore the criticism of virology that exists since it's inception.
I looked at the criticism (see one of my earlier comments). It's exactly what you call it, criticism, no proof.
>looking forward.
😆 I bet you do, but it might take a few years. Right now I really enjoy my no fuss hairstyle.
>A bit too easy, I asked about radiation and you answered with a virus.
> "Cancers" are widespread thanks to vaccines and Bigpharma, correlation doesn't imply causation in science, only in religion.
Since when do wild animals get vaccines? Cancer isn't just a human problem.
>Well IDK how that works but hearing kindle Iassume paid crap. I just wanted to point out that only a jew cashes shekels on digital copies of MK.
Everything Hitler had, he left in his testament to the Party and copyright is the Volk.
Of course you pay for the device and the books, but you can also send free ebooks to it. I just love it because of its portability. And if you go on holiday you don't want to take heavy books with, or at least I don't want. Imo one of the best inventions for people who read a lot.
Would you believe in a virus that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
Let's analyse that because it's a fallacy.
Analogy. Would you believe in a microscopic alien from Mars, capable of teleportation that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
You can't see it looking at unknown never seen thing. Is Mr. microscope going to tell you this is alien? And how will Mr. microscope know it's from Mars asuuming no one never was on a Mars? How does microscope show you teleportation? Analogically this alien is told to be in your snot.
How you know what in the snot is alien without first isolating a alien? You can even observe CPE. How do you know alien just doesn't die begause of your manipulation method because you threw antibiotics (anti life) on him?
Do you see it now? Microscope doesn't prove the properties you allege that virus has—infectability and other ascribed symptoms, Kochs postulates do. You did not read what I gave you. It's explained there. You assume it's existence without proving it because picture told you to. That is not science but religion in alien.
>Blabber. You have proof, did you verify that? or TV told you?
again, TV doesn't tell me shit cause I ain't watching. I like to read. And yes, I also read things that are way out of my world view.
So, of course I haven't seen a sheep fucking a lamb. But I also never have see a bear in the wild, does that mean they only exist in Zoos? Or do I believe the witnesses that did and then combine it with the knowledge that all Zoo animals have to come from somewhere.
Would you believe it if you see the lamb suffering? Would you believe in a virus that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
>Projecting and ad lapidem. You believe it and have no arguments.
Do I really need to present you a link to a source? I'm sure you know most of them but reject them. Do you want links to the Nature magazine?
>How do the toxins know who is the jew and who isn't? Do they ask you before? Do they check your genealogy? That doesn't make sense!
>What? You clearly didn't read it like any virlogy study either.
I was referring to your chemotherapy claim.
>You understand everything? Where did you learn all that?
>I admit that I did not study biology or medicine.
That's not a problem. I'm in a very different field as well.
>Of course not. You learn a lot in 3 years when someone tries to torture you not allow you to enter shop to buy food for filthy shekels and inject poisons into you. Knowledge is power. I can assure you doctors don't even read those studies.
We all went through this.
Most doctors don't read those studies cause you have to dig deep to find them. As your link tree showed there was two main stream media articles on the inaccuracies of DNA samples (Yes, I actually look at the texts you send. I don't click on images tho.). That's how science works, you create a theory and then work your way along it for the proof. In some cases you reach a dead end (string theory 😆 sorry dear physicists). In other cases you confirm it but also show the limits of the real life value.
>You went to school didn't you? You must know how it goes their. Do students question what teacher preaches or is that a taboo and such student would be mocked and pushed out of collective? That's not education that is indoctrination. Repetition doesn't require inteligence. Good recommended https://liberdon.com/users/akeno/statuses/107354339566570479 This only requires basic logic and analitical and critical thinking. It's science. If it's not verifiable and reproducible it's fraud.... and I don't spend time on being distracted by agenda against my own biology.
Yes, I went to school. Yes, I was mocked and not part of the collective (even before my coming out). I had teachers that welcomed critical thinking and teachers that kicked me out of class for it.
There are two kinds of logic, formal and informal. I like to think that I am decent on formal logic, that might explain some shortcomings on the informal logic.
>You assume it, have no arguments, no proof, and at this point you ignore the criticism of virology that exists since it's inception.
I looked at the criticism (see one of my earlier comments). It's exactly what you call it, criticism, no proof.
>looking forward.
😆 I bet you do, but it might take a few years. Right now I really enjoy my no fuss hairstyle.
>A bit too easy, I asked about radiation and you answered with a virus.
> "Cancers" are widespread thanks to vaccines and Bigpharma, correlation doesn't imply causation in science, only in religion.
Since when do wild animals get vaccines? Cancer isn't just a human problem.
>Well IDK how that works but hearing kindle Iassume paid crap. I just wanted to point out that only a jew cashes shekels on digital copies of MK.
Everything Hitler had, he left in his testament to the Party and copyright is the Volk.
Of course you pay for the device and the books, but you can also send free ebooks to it. I just love it because of its portability. And if you go on holiday you don't want to take heavy books with, or at least I don't want. Imo one of the best inventions for people who read a lot.
This is getting hopeless. You claim to read but do you realize you have not got familiar with any arguments presented to your belief that you see your alleged unicorns under microscope, since you didn't how do you know it's not correct? That is ad ignorantiam.
>Do I really need to present you a link to a source? I'm sure you know most of them but reject them. Do you want links to the Nature magazine?
You think this is logical? Statement without proof is not argument but blabber. Of course you do, for argument's sake, you have burden of proof! I would quickly show you what you believe is proof in fact isn't. Since you don't allow that i accurately said you are making fallacy against Popper's Razor. I actually know all of them and they are all refuted as having no base in scientific method, and reject them because they are invalid. Question is why you want to neither proof what you claim (truth can be proven, lies can't) neither you want to hear arguments of critics how and where are virologists wrong or outright lie, nor you want to adrees them?
>I was referring to your chemotherapy claim.
But incorrectly. You made strawman about how "toxins know about jews". Article didn't claim that. You couldn't read it. I though you speak German, I have a translation if you need.
>We all went through this.
yet majority of "resistance" doesn't understand anything because of mass stupidization.
>Most doctors don't read those studies cause you have to dig deep to find them. As your link tree showed there was two main stream media articles on the inaccuracies of DNA samples (Yes, I actually look at the texts you send. I don't click on images tho.). That's how science works, you create a theory and then work your way along it for the proof.
Really!? But you apparently click on a lot of images that claim to be of a "virus".
No. They don't read them because they don't understand them, as they use them as arguments. That's idiocy.
And innacuracy is proof of existence? Not proof of unreproducibility which means not science? Doesn't bother you? Proof is something accurate and repeatable/verifiable.
>In some cases you reach a dead end (string theory 😆 sorry dear physicists). In other cases you confirm it but also show the limits of the real life value.
You are derailing into theoretical generalization blabber again. You really don't bother with burden of proof do you? Hilarious jokes you tell yourself where no corruption happens. A corruption denier I could call you.
>Yes, I went to school. Yes, I was mocked and not part of the collective (even before my coming out). I had teachers that welcomed critical thinking and teachers that kicked me out of class for it.
There are two kinds of logic, formal and informal. I like to think that I am decent on formal logic, that might explain some shortcomings on the informal logic.
Wasn't talking about mocking for social traits, but mocking someone who would ask a professor for proof of his claims about the thought subject AKA criticising authority of teacher...
How can you not see then you are making fallacies?
You should have no problem writing your arguments formally then, no way they would come out valid. That is scientific method - control experiment. Popper's razor principle on control that the methodology used doesn't create the desired effect. What virologists don't do for good reason.
I have to sadly tell you, you would Fail 1st semester of Logic, because I had to pass it.
>I looked at the criticism (see one of my earlier comments). It's exactly what you call it, criticism, no proof.
Irrelevant, that was about differnt topic, you did not look because you are not adressing any of the arguments. Like explaining this:
https://void.cat/d/64iDWzeLawa91KT5JJ2Qg1.webp
So, blunt ad ignorantiam again. You want proof from me to nonexistence, that is logical fallacy as well. I am not asking you to proof nonexistence of God either. I am not making statements "viruses" or "genes" exist, you do. You don't understand difference between refuting—showing proof doesn't exist (contained in critical analysis by own contradictory statements of virologists even) & your burden of proof.
>😆 I bet you do, but it might take a few years. Right now I really enjoy my no fuss hairstyle.
Better start ASAP then.
>Since when do wild animals get vaccines? Cancer isn't just a human problem.
"...and Bigpharma" !!, Strawman again you are not focusing. Wild animals wasn't an argument, people were, but be it. Do they also not get sweet treats of ex. chemical spills?
>Imo one of the best inventions for people who read a lot.
I just don't read on holiday. Waste of time not seeing places.