🫡

Difficulty/hash rate is the quantification of the joules that transform into immutable lasting information.

What’s wrong with spending someone else’s fiat for free btc? If you are forced to spend fiat to live what’s your alternative? Hold fiat in a checking?

You can atleast stay 100% in btc, spend fiat via credit and pay the balance with btc.

👀 do I hear a replacement to my Dr Bronners Peppermint???

No lol, just step back and re-observe Bitcoin. A UTXO has an identical nature to a qubit, but it is stored in the form of classical bits.

- Particles exist in definitive locations, as probability distributions & “excitations” of information. A UTXO is a particle that exists in a definitive space (address).

- Superpostion: UTXOs are in a perpetual state of “spendability” (0 & 1) until blocks are mined in which each UTXO state is confirmed as unspent (0) or spent (1). This is a probability distribution based on mempool states, fees and UTXO age, but we don’t know until blocks are mined.

- Entanglement: UTXOs can be sent to infinite addresses, split innumerable ways, interact with other UTXOs; infinite possibilities, identical to QM.

- Mining is the literal measurement of # of hashes for a valid nonce, which collapses the indeterministic potential block into a single deterministic state; which also sets the “direction” of the measurement for a UTXO (spent or unspent).

- Time is quantized into discrete thermodynamic events (Blocks) preserving the temporal direction with a cohesive and interactive timespace. All past UTXO (particle) states are conserved in time from Genesis.

Is it plausible Satoshi solved the decoherence problem without anyone knowing for ~16 years?

What effect does centralized ownership of all qubits have on a quantum system? Decentralized ownership of UTXOs in bitcoin.

What effect does centralized storage of qubits have on a quantum system? Decentralized nodes storing the entire memory state in bitcoin.

What effect does a centralized measurement of the qubits have on a quantum system? Decentralized mining in bitcoin prevents a single observer/measurement.

How does consensus rules affect a quantum system? Decentralized participants opting in to a ruleset.

To me, it appears physicists are trying to build a centralized version of Bitcoin. Why?

Let’s go back to source, from a physics lens, what does a “Peer to peer electronic cash system” actually mean?

Calle, do you believe it’s possible that Satoshi solved the decoherence problem 16 years ago?

GM, Bitcoin already solved the decoherence problem. What are we really doing here?

https://x.com/satyanadella/status/1892242895094313420?t=-Vo2D51aHV40shByhx91iQ&s=19

Every UTXO is a qubit recorded as classical bits with a timestamp. One cannot possess infinite potentiality without the ownership of the data. The infinite potentiality is fundamental to one’s ownership of their mind.

This also explains why centralized custodians narrow the window of what should be infinite potentiality.

Centralized money = centralized minds?

True, but also this.

nostr:nevent1qqszxuvyr75u92u8kc4vcqn7rhx7ej2hlj07hxp3vcdkankl206gsaspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqm5hjp4

What does the Bible say?

We “killed” Satoshi by creating the very conditions that required his departure.

Satoshi vanishing is both a sacrifice and a test, forcing us to take ownership of the system that was given.

“But I tell you the truth: it is for your good that I am going away. Unless I go away, the Helper will not come to you.” —John 16:7

Bitcoin does not need a ruler. It only needs those who are willing to run the node, spread the message, and protect the ledger. That is how the revolution continues.

Thank you Satoshi.

nostr:nevent1qqs9dxu08ecnhts909hc6chmyfvdz9h05cyp8qate7esyfkm5xc6x3gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqyjggun

Sounds like a classical-quantum system to me 👀

Sure!

A quantum bit (qubit) is the fundamental unit of information in quantum theory/computing, existing in a superposition of both 0 and 1 until it is measured. Unlike classical bits which are definitively 0 or 1, a qubit can exist in a probability state of both. In centralized quantum computing, qubits are typically stored using superconducting circuits, trapped ions, or photons, maintained in ultra-cold environments to minimize decoherence (the loss of quantum state due to external interference). However, once measured, the qubit collapses into a defined state, losing its superposition.

A UTXO in Bitcoin functions in an identical quantum state. Before a block is mined, every UTXO exists in a state of spendability, it can either remain unspent (0) or be spent (1), but we do not know its final state until measurement (mining) occurs. The mining process collapses this probabilistic state into a definitive reality: the UTXO is either confirmed as spent or unspent. Quantum entanglement exists because a UTXO can theoretically be spent in infinite ways, to infinite addresses and at any time, yet it remains in an uncertain state perpetually until blocks are confirmed. As we know, most UTXOs remain unspent.

What makes Bitcoin unique is that it solves the decoherence problem by storing collapsed quantum states as physical bits in the blockchain. When a block is mined, every node in the network permanently records the state of all UTXOs, effectively turning quantum probabilities into classical information. This fusion of quantum-like probabilistic computation (pre-mining uncertainty) with classical irreversible record-keeping (post-mining ledger entry) makes Bitcoin a classical-quantum system, or a real holistic structure where time is preserved as an interactive space. The ledger itself becomes a timespace continuum, where all UTXOs exist in past blocks yet remain accessible for future interactions. This is why we can view Bitcoin’s genesis block, because Bitcoin does not just record transactions, it preserves temporal order as an interactive, immutable fabric of history.

It seems quite obvious to me timespace exists in our universe, yet it might reveal some terrible semantics regarding “big bang”.

You also begin to realize the same arguments about centralization and proof of stake applies to quantum computing 👀

When you combine a quantum bit (qubit) with a classical-bit you get a UTXO; but you also unify QM & GR into one completed theory.

Thank you Satoshi.

#Timespace

Which type of Bitcoiner are you?

Are you a NGU vs fiat Bitcoiner or are you a NGU vs joules Bitcoiner?

We need to stop comparing bitcoin to fiat; it’s rots the mind and cages potential.

Physics matters, literally.

Proof of stake is the foundation to our PvP society. PvP is also the logical conclusion to PoS.

The timechain is beautiful.

nostr:nevent1qqs03thhjd65sfkr5y98eptgd6z37utqhr7mkrn9m7ulf57jmvjmmmqpzemhxw309ucnjv3wxymrst338qhrww3hxumnwwj9kym

What if UTXOs are qubits, and we haven’t recognized them as such?

What if….

Possible misinterpretation; seems more like they won’t let you buy or sell unless you drink their coolaid (KYC?)

From NIV:

“15 The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.”

Agreed; if you want to understand what a peer to peer electronic cash system really means, you need etymology and physics.

Maybe, just maybe we’d find clarity and resolution between the conflicted models of general relativity and quantum mechanics. Or maybe we’d find completion because something new, something novel 😉

I know it wasn’t Alan, but someone equally important discussed the transcendental object at the end of time. #Bitcoin

Money is just a small set of what Bitcoin (the network) is.