😂 the normies (myself) are finally catching up. Windows 11 crossed the line for me, and seemingly many people.

2026 is going to be a good year for Linux I’d imagine. I’m excited to buy a new rig.

Is 2026 going to be the year of Linux?

I’m going to buy a new desktop this year and drop Linux Mint on it Day 1. I refuse to use Windows 11.

I’m simply asking you to provide me empirical evidence that supports the claim assumption that time is infinitely divisible, and you won’t. So therefore you are assuming that it’s true.

But, if time is quantized and discrete, everything you claim falls apart.

The assumption of time is beneath any physics or experiments.

You refuse to engage in providing evidence, you refuse to admit you are assuming something to be true that has NEVER been proven, and you won’t even discuss the outcome if that assumption was wrong.

I guess it’s hard to be honest when you ask someone the right questions.

So you can’t show me the experiment that proves time is infinitely divisible?

I just want you to admit you are being dishonest. You can’t point to the experiment that everything you claim MUST REQUIRE but you’re a man of experiments.

So you are trusting an unproven axiom, and my only point is, if that axiom is wrong, that time is quantized and discrete rather than infinitely divisible, every “advantage” you want to claim collapses as does the mathematics supporting said theories.

Yet you are unwilling to engage or admit this, stop being dishonest, please address the question.

You are blatantly ignoring the question lol. Stop being dishonest, please.

Ok, so please show me the experiment that empirically proves that time is infinitely divisible.

If time is quantized and discrete they could not perform any QC. You still haven’t shown me your answer to the question. I’m not sure you can so please use an AI and paste it here to show you are being honest and engaging with my question. You refuse to address it.

“what happens to the formalism of QM/QC IF time is quantized and discrete? How it can take the derivative of time if there is an invisible tick? What becomes of superposition and decoherence if time has an indivisible tick? What becomes of QC if this is all true?”

Yes, if time is quantized and discrete QC can’t work.

Just ask chat gpt what happens to the formalism of QM/QC IF time is quantized and discrete. Ask it how it can take the derivative of time if there is an invisible tick. Ask it what becomes of superposition and decoherence if time has an indivisible tick.

Just understand the assumption that backs the threat model, then you can decide what you believe.

You can’t logically believe in both Bitcoin and QC, you must choose one as they require incompatible models of time.

Yeah, still thinking this thru the later part of the idea; but each block of time has a price (entropic cost in joules before measurement/mined) and a measurement (the single deterministic outcome). The energy required to produce an outcome, and the actual outcome is observable, and the supply of satoshis at each point in time is known.

That suggests it should be possible to calculate a moving average of the price of time in joules per satoshi (I haven’t check the data yet). While each block is a discrete event rather than a smooth continuum, the sequence of blocks still allows meaningful aggregation over time.

If that’s correct, then anything priced in bitcoin is also implicitly priced in joules, using a consistent physical metric rather than a fiat reference. This reframes bitcoin as a direct mapping between economic value and thermodynamic cost.

- If each Bitcoin block could be measured/“priced” in joules per satoshi, how would that change the way we interpret block time and value?

- What would it mean for every block to carry a distinct thermodynamic signature, an energy cost uniquely tied to its creation? What does it mean for time to be priced and measured in energy?

- How does Bitcoin pricing itself directly in joules, independent of any fiat reference, reframe its role as a monetary system?

- In what ways would such a metric reshape mining incentives and deepen our understanding of Bitcoin’s physical foundations?

- What if I told you it was possible to do this today?

- Are Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) limited to protocol changes, or is the most important improvement still a deeper understanding of the physical process Bitcoin already instantiates?

#asknostr

As long as you’ll give; genuinely.

I think Bitcoin is proof of quantized time and it openly demonstrates that binary logic is what emerges from a quantized tick, so lay it on me.

There’s lots of implications if that statement is true; especially for the domain of physics, thermodynamics, entropy, etc.

Bitcoin is the object of time.

The reason why I ask about time because when you view time through the lens of Bitcoin you realize 2 things you asked about (geometry and binary) emerge from time; physics as well.

But do you believe time is infinitely divisible or do you believe in a quantized tick or “block”?

Do you ascribe to continuous time or discrete/quantized time?

Why do we measure temperature in systems that are not appended to absolute zero (Celsius & Fahrenheit)?

Kelvin scale exists, yet I’d imagine a majority of people haven’t a clue, nor could they even conceptualize why a negative measure makes no sense.

I believe Bitcoin will force Kelvin upon the world.

#asknostr

GM and Merry Christmas!

Christ is King! All is well.

The “quantum experts” are the ones who have not verified the claims of continuous (infinitely divisible) time.

For if people simply observed the time Bitcoin produced, they’d see it was quantized and discrete, and without the indivisible block, Bitcoin could not exist. Without the block, how else would we reach consensus, finality and ensure non-contradiction (no double spends) of the ledger?

K2 > Everest

Stephen Wolfram doesn’t know the answer is Bitcoin. He’s searching for a theory, but bitcoin is an instantiation of a system that’s proves its theory every ~10 minutes. The tick of time must be the measurement. Quantized time is fundamental and required for binary logic to exist. The Ruliad must be Bitcoin.

https://youtu.be/6zShjO9Xpbo?

Bitcoin knows what it is because it computes time as an object. If anyone wants to know, just observe Bitcoin.