The 6 million comes later when Bitcoin has more adoption and after Papa Powell prints his next round of Benjamins.
That's basically what Bitcoin and Lindt chocolateers did for me.
I think it's achievable in small isolated areas this decade. For it to be widespread, yeah, a little further down the road. Anarchy is a relationship and a recognition of no authority, no legitimate coercion. A community of anarchists, or a family of anarchists, is already free.
You're actually pretty understandable overall. It was mostly me lol
omg yeah I gave up on using desktop apps until they fix the bugs. I'm exclusively on Amethyst.
I mean I realize this was about what you can do as president, so it's a different ballgame. I guess I should have saved this for nostr:npub1uw6lgv5qyexx68fwgdmwt3w7v3dwv679sray2ncpkug70ad7a8gqut3tay who also respinded but said AnCap is kinda Utopian.
Which in turn I think I misunderstood, now that I've reread it lol! I'm all over the place.
Utopian if we achieve it through the state? I would agree if that's what you mean. Sorry, brain fog today.
I mean I realize this was about what you can do as president, so it's a different ballgame. I guess I should have saved this for nostr:npub1uw6lgv5qyexx68fwgdmwt3w7v3dwv679sray2ncpkug70ad7a8gqut3tay who also respinded but said AnCap is kinda Utopian.
Society is coordinated by individual people. The market, including the political market, produces a sum of what these people want, restrained by what they are willing and able to sacrifice to get it. When a lot of people want rulers, we get rulers. When that is no longer true, why do you think that the political market would still have small states across the board? I mean, yes that is a likely outcome, but why stop there? For people to believe government should be local and limited, and for people to believe that government should be of the individual over himself, is not that huge of a leap. It is only a rational leap in the mind, and I see the two to be just about as likely as each other.
So in my view, both Anarcho-Capitalism and Anti-Federalism are equally difficult to achieve, but one is more preferable to the other. Something being closer in its end result to the status quo does not necessarily make it "practical." And by adhering to inconsistent ideology, you weaken and complicate the simple libertarian message: no hierarchy of authority, consent-based society where even those who enforce the law are subject to that same law.
My difficulties with reasoning with (or being harassed by) libsoc in one video
ew states! it would be an improvement, but not by a whole lot.
Push for a constitutional amendment recognizing the right of everyone to opt out of government, repeal income tax, prohibit monopoly grants on what is considered "legal tender," and make all representative positions in the House transferable and voluntarily chosen by the citizens anong the 435 seats, rather than democratically selected.
Then again the national security apparatus might muder me when they find out rhey won't be getting their funds soon, since I would have acceperated the inevitable removal of the fiat monopoly.
Yeah people really do forget about gen x for some reason. It's all arbitrary tribalist thought though, really meaningless and distracting from the reality of individuals. Statism and other forms of irrationality like fragile mindsets and fixed pie fallacy are the real enemies, and what spoils every age's minds.
You opened this can of worms haha!!
