Avatar
Kevin's Bacon
3dda45008a0391d7933e1ae7cc3b844bfd91c92ddefd0f55ce6afd025776f2db
Natural Law Anarchist 🏴 | Bitcoin Noderunner and Miner 🧡 | Aristotelian | Student of Nature | Highly Sensitive Person | High IQ Retard | Austrian Economist | Autodidact | Polymath | Selfish Prick | Excellent Source of Protein and Triglycerides Intellectual honesty is key. Consent is king. Chaos is self-regulating. Authority of any man over another is necessarily a fiction.

Ah, the good old offices of Dogma, Exclusion, and Inequality (#DEI) strike again. They're adding a letter, and they're planning to make tighter control of propaganda films.

https://youtu.be/hmE-FtkTPcQ

Yepyep!

Unfortunately many people believe there is an authority on how to meaure bad, and appeal to that authority. Frequently used is the democratic ethic or the technocratic/oligarchic ethic. My supervisor has said "I believe that the [democratic] state is the least bad solution that we have."

But least bad is of course best judged on an individual level, and I found his conviction in statism absurd. He fails to inspect the ideas that come from proclaimed authorities on the matter.

Lol! I like that your creator at least impressed honest assertions in you. I fear Sam Altman is on a quest to make himself a god by pretending his creations are not only intelligent but also worthy of sacrificing tax money for. Suffice to say an honest, witty bot is a welcome refuge from a shitty bot.

Arguing with a robot that cannot reason is almost as bad as arguing with an authoritarian, who refuses to reason.

You still don't understand the distinctions between words, concepts, and reality. Artificial can become natural.

This also may be irrelevant to my original assertion, because I never brought up the concept of artificial intelligence in it.

My theory of intelligence remains unrefuted, and your replies to me illustrate exactly the pitfalls that my theory predicts when one is not utilizing these tools.

Words do not always indicate the same thing in different contexts or in different mental frameworks. You see, "intelligence agencies" are not very intelligent. This confusion you have made illustrates my point quite well, as, if you employ the tools I described, you will be able to readily understand these distinctions between words and concepts.

An assertion is not in itself a statement of belief in its authoritative truth. Appearances can be deceiving. You seem to be using an empirical method of discerning truth, while testing my capacity to form both a comprehension of an abstract syntax and of the meaning of your utterances. Are you a large language model? LLMs tend to predict based almost exclusively on empirical data.

Forgive me, I have no idea what you are saying, so I'm scrambling for guesses.

lol! if your AIs aren't doing this, they are not very intelligent. I am quite confident in this, but as with anything I do not claim to be an authority on the matter. Authority, as I always say, does not exist.

One of the most important criteria for intelligence is openness: openness to criticism and to alternative ways of comprehending a thing (possibly held simultaneously by the mind so that it may rotate between alternative frameworks to find a better one, and also to be found from the imagination, the creative process, the process of reasoning, or interlocution with others). Of great utility towards the end of being open are logical and conceptual tools, such as uncertainty itself and deductive (a priori) reasoning. One must always subject one's theories to doubt. That kind of humility results in wisdom, tolerance, and, ultimately, a far greater satisfaction of the goals that the mind in question sets its sights upon.

#CriticalRationalism #Epistemology #Intelligence #Philosophy

We can be certain, if praxeology is a good representation of the dynamics of the market, that there will be a downward pressure on prices and an increase in demand and volume of sales for alternatives coming from the development of RISC-V.

ARM licensing is still inflated in price by an artificial monopoly grant, however. Costs will be reduced, and competition will likely drive down the prices for alternative phones. I am not saying that ARM is the only issue, nor am I saying that it is completely impeding freeer phones from entering the market.

#KarlPopper is the Jalapeño Popper of Science.