Confession: I shorted the 🌽 last night and I'm doing it again today. Hate me. 🤷🤑

Zaps represent the only fundamentally new innovation in social media.

Everything else is a distraction.

I’ve been an entrepreneur since I was 20 and for the first time I feel like I’ve been able to create authentically and in true collaboration.

Wild to experience & witness. This is possible bc I’m focused on contributing to a network ruled by natural law, not a few rulers. This is freedom. Opting out to opt in.

WAMI (we are making it) on & with #Bitcoin 🙏

Hey everybody! My name is Royale and I am a DJ/Content Creator/Live Streamer! I love Pokemon and Hip Hop & EDM music!

#introductions

I also think it's appropriate and normal to use both deontological and consequentialist ethics.

I never got much into Natural Rights Theory though.

I like what I've heard from the philosopher Michael Huemer.

He argues from an intuitionism perspective.

Basically arguing that we intuitively know that our life is our own without using much if any philosophical framing.

And that it doesn't seem to make any sense that the government should have any special authority over us unless it serves a very good reason.

The approach is clean, to the point, and cuts out any framing that's starting point based on an intuition anyway.

No. She's ugly.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

The real world effective difference between objective and subjective morality may be negligible.

If morality were to be considered objective, everyone still forms their own interpretations of the official objective morality by using their own unique intuitive dispositions.

If morality were to be considered subjective, each person still thinks their moral code is superior to other codes or lack thereof and ought to at least in part be applied universally.

Yeah it's really just a choice of how to frame it, with no consistent distinction being uniquely identified by that one thing.

A philosophy, for the same reason, cannot be judged by only a single assertion. It has to have a defined relationship to other assertions or objects to have any meaning.

The real world effective difference between objective and subjective morality may be negligible.

If morality were to be considered objective, everyone still forms their own interpretations of the official objective morality by using their own unique intuitive dispositions.

If morality were to be considered subjective, each person still thinks their moral code is superior to other codes or lack thereof and ought to at least in part be applied universally.