Avatar
Adrian M Lopez
401854bbc0144fcfd101487095d40aeeaedf5d66b2c2c21db5154f7b2327acb8

I think they use long range lenses to avoid being in the way of people going to the show so it’s harder for the camera to show up in the reflection. If I’m not mistaken of course

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

A short story on why ETH is dying and will continue to do so:

First, why on earth does the ETH crowd work so hard to be the cringiest thing in the world?

Second, ETH is stagnant because they sold their token on a bunch of "revolutionary hullabaloo" and literally the only thing with a meaningful market turned out to just be token gambling during the hype cycles. The growth was always on the "next thing" that was gonna "break open the floodgates" of the whole world running on the ethereum VM, but it never came and there was never a use case that really mattered.

The value case for Bitcoin was always just fixing the money. ETH thought it was literally going to replace the entire internet with a giant, slow AF, expensive, poorly secured and completely unnecessary consensus system because the whole world would financialize everything arbitrarily, and literally sold people on that idea. Apparently all of the same things, "BuT WiTh tOkENs!" that inject pointless volatility, liquidity problems, and that were all centralized anyway, was somehow a "groundbreaking" idea.

-- Bitcoin realized that the problem was the gross OVER financialization of the world, and the pointless gambling of the fiat financial and political apparatus that had caused staggering imbalances and trillions in misallocated and wasted resources. All resulting from shitty, cheap, endlessly manipulated money. It sought to END it.

-- While ETH didn't even understand that as a problem. To the contrary, it sought to EXPAND the over financialization of everything into every last corner of the world and into every market that it hadn't yet ruined.

It only hung on for as long as it did because it had a "roadmap" and everyone could just point to a date in the future where it would suddenly get better and fix all the problems. It was the iceberg build, then the avalanche merge, then the deep freeze, or whatever stupid name they came up with for the15 stages of their 1 year plan that stretched out a decade, that finally culminated into the conversion to a PERMISSIONED proof of stake system... and it was all just a giant "meh."

It's now even more convoluted and less secure, and essentially for the sole purpose of appealing to the "cult of fixing the weather." And still to this day, they survive on the last vestiges of token gambling, but increasingly people are finding out that theres no long term market to gamble on stuff that has no purpose to begin with, except to simply gamble with money. Adding arbitrary tokens just makes it worse. Slot machines are far simpler and serve the purpose perfectly. And if the tokens aren't going anywhere, then there is no way up, and if the token gambling isn't going anywhere, then what does ETH even do except suck at the one thing #Bitcoin has done since the beginning? Be reliable, trustworthy, open, and incorruptible money.

#Bitcoin sught to undo the destructive disincentives of the fiat world. While ETH tried to "technify" all of those bad incentives by tokenizing it all on the blockchain, without ever understanding what any of it actually meant.

--------------------

Financialization for the sake of financialization is so completely missing the point. That is always what "crypto," with ETH as the cringe father of it all, really represented.

The slow, drawn out fall of ethereum was easily predicted.

nostr:note1txflur2zcx2j92acjmx7xljm9a2t7sw9tj62qgx94rz6fdn47h2sk4a5ej

Well said man, well said!

Right?! lol that’s why I don’t put much thought into chem trails. Can I actually do anything about it? Maybe defund the government by buying btc?

Words and definitions matter people!

nostr:note13clsry6n6hd59mgn08es2ry04n9flm8hkq3w9vzjhj6px9lytkfq5lhqf6

If I’m not mistaken, the highest (or second highest) number of bitcoin transactions occur in the African continent and even despite the technological differences you mentioned they seem to be quicker to understand and adopt bitcoin when compared to “westerners”. There may or may not be any correlation around child mortality specifically but in sure we agree and can see that the quality/strength of the money affects most if not all of these factors in some way. But yes it’d be incredibly difficult to parse out all the data to support this theory. On a gut level the theory makes sense and for this mental exercise that’s good enough!

Came for NGU stayed for the community of builders.

nostr:note1u888a3jtxkqm3jkx29z4pf254w7z9284mfa42a53nt3g5nanqw2qx8nuf5

I’m not big into marketing my work so I’m not 100% on all the details but this is what I’ve noticed: there are a lot of genre junkies out there who read just about anything within the scope of their preferences even if it’s mediocre. You see this a lot in the “splatterpunk” and erotica genre. Splatterpunk is basically for gore hounds who wanna read books with nasty kills. A lot of these get circulated and recommended via TikTok. The “similar authors” section on Audible and Amazon keep those genre junkies occupied (and authors fed) despite the mainstream algo not always pushing the darker content like erotica and horror. I wanna get more of those people here on Nostr! I’ve had inconsistent experiences trying to follow anything horror related on mainstream social medias because of censorship. I literally wasn’t allowed to follow #horror on Instagram and, I shit you not, it showed me a suicide hotline number. How condescending can meta get?!