I'm ok with sidestepping appstores. You can always download apks or build alternative appstores.

But all custodial wallets will come under pressure to do mass surveillance. Self-custody is a must.

LN address is nice UX. I just want to make it an easy transition for those using WoS right now.

Never forget, during this moment in time, while some of our best developers are building products to help keep us free,

Udi and Eric are focused on putting wizards on the blockchain.

They aren’t trying to improve bitcoin or battle test the network….to them, it was always about acquiring more fiat. They got in early, made plenty of money, and now spend their time trying to make a joke of bitcoiners.

They will be humbled.

So what is going on in the USA? I see another open source wallet with beta and no US availability 🐶🐾🤔🤔🤔

Will add to next version! I feel like its slightly more technical than the other options but its a great wallet

Planazo!!!

Mi mujer lo vio y estaba deseando poder ir.

A ver si por Madrid algún día podemos organizar algo.

These days there are some great self-custodial Bitcoin Lightning wallets to choose from. Some even integrate an LSP so you don't have to manage your own channel liquidity.

Here is a simplified overview of the major players and how their fee arrangements differ.

As Bitcoin on-chain fees rise, you should have a basic understanding of where LSP costs are incurred so you can plan accordingly.

For example, funding your wallet will allow you to send, but if you are receiving lightning payments you will require inbound liquidity.

If you want to receive a payment on a new wallet, an on-chain transaction may be required on behalf of the user by the LSP in order to provide the necessary capacity.

In high Bitcoin fee environments this can sometimes result in unforeseen transaction fees. Be aware.

The devs are working hard and shipping improvements and new features all the time.

As these products develop I'll attempt to publish any relevant updates.

⚡️

Looks like Wallet or Satoshi just got removed from Google Play and the Apple App Store.

Storm’s a brewing.

AGI, true or exaggerated 🧐Thoughts?

Won't that be weird since you can get sub-140 reply notes but the root over-140 note won't load?

I would accept the kind:4001 only from the original note owner, it is tricky to manage a priority queue of events in a decentralized environment, which leads to possible attacks. At least at the beginning, to see how things flow.

Or I would make it optional using a tag in the kind:1; this could be by default non permissive, with a client preference.

Not having a single client adequately be able to search people by @ NIP names (or even NPUBs sometimes) is, without a doubt, the biggest hurdle NOSTR adoption faces.

Why can't this be made much easier?