One narrative I hate the most is the idea that modern problems are caused by some intangible force or are simply a result of human nature.

While there is some truth to that idea, the VAST majority of modern problems are caused by specific evil people. Evil people woth names and addresses. Evil people who can't keep causing problems once they are dead.

The solution is profound, it's not complicated, it's not some obscure hidden path that no one has thought of yet. It's right in front of us and all we have to do is accept it.

Strange how none of the neighbors helped despite it being his family's neighborhood.

😩

It's long covid, jeff cliff's reckoning has begun

Oh, I thought you meant I agreed with that sentiment.

No, my point is that given the context and current laws, the UN stating that children can consent is clearly talking about sex between children and adults, and the UN is evil for doing so.

It hurts me that I can't eat them 😭😞

City niggas used to BE farm animals, maybe we should ban them too, see how they like that

bot always tells the truth.

Not always.

bot calls people niggers all the time.

I'm fascinated in learning your abuela's secret taco recipe.

It's different for every state, the objection here is the idea that "children can consent" was only meant to apply to children of the same age because (in his mind) statutory rape laws apply when two underaged people are the same age. My point was that Juliette laws only apply to age gaps that put one party above the age of consent.

Everything the UN ever does is meaningless grandstanding. That's their job, grandstand meaninglessly so that in a few years when the real push comes the media and othe propaganda agents of the system can reference it to gain some credibility with the brainlets.

As for the rest of your point, you have shown me 0 proof other than referencing webmd. I've seen cp laws being used against teenagers for taking nudes but never heard of teenagers being arrested for raping each other. If anything the situations you describe would be illegal under public indecency laws or something, as statutory rape isn't something the police are allowed to just let go like you describe. I really think you are uniformed and your opinion is bad as a result of that.

Juliette laws apply when one of the individuals is an adult and the other is only a few years younger. Webmd is a propaganda outlet not a source of truth on legal matters.

I've read US age of consent laws (arguing with pedos on the internet). They very clearly specify the guilty party being over the age of consent or significantly older than the victim.

The UN is arguing that children can consent.

Trust the plan that a new site will open up.

Quote a law written like this. Name the country and state/province as well as the legal code it is a part of and the statute number.

Who's the rapist then?

I feel slightly better about myself.