It's simple enough that it might just work, but it's insane how all the other solutions so far have been either some blockchain or DHT based bullshit
wen TCP/NOSTR?
nostr:note1fdgfqkq30y0n5knv4a4ycuy2qujwh7z6vr6cczseelhndh26drmsynrkur
i don't understand many of the things that you are working on, but keep continuing to build your dreams 💜
Nostr Nests 2.0 is getting a lot of exposure here in #Atlantis. Many people are excited to hear that https://NostrNests.com is now a full fledged Nostr client. Nests is even getting added to other client roadmaps 👀 Super bullshit.
the network can be used to send messages among different parties in even without making an actual txn. but I don't like projects that do that, because doing the same over nostr or some other protocol built for communication has less friction that lightning
if you are thinking of embedding data in the actual txns itself, then whatever is allowed in a Bitcoin txn is allowed on lightning as well, because lightning txns are unbroadcast Bitcoin txns
you can use OP_RETURN to embed data, which will need to re-embeded on each channel update (aka txn), or you can use the much more efficient, yet much more complex RGB (or taro), which just embeds a representation of the actual data on the txns, and the data itself is transferred to the recipient separately
they spam you with sats but you also get some sats. i think it's a fair deal, although not optimal for your custodial LN provider to store the increased channel state for such small txns
Quick thought on this, if websites start implementing "login via nostr", it would be a good idea to have a separate nsec that you don't use for much that you could plug into those things. They'll be useful, same as "login via Google" is useful, but it's important to have shields up. Maybe nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm could preempt this by setting up a way to create a profile/keypair specifically for that purpose where the system can make sure that there is a clear separation between our various profiles and outside services have a harder time breaking down walls without permission.
I'm working on a new proposal that will allow you to log into other non nostr services/websites, and it will generate a new npub from your existing nsec for each services/website
I wasn't that person but I was talking about a DHT for nostr last week on the Telegram group, will check out pkarr, thanks
you can give it prompts like summarize the last 5 notes by karnage and it will query its own nostr relay and give you the answer
unleashed.chat does it already
Other FOSS guys, the e/acc open source AI guys are pretty rad too. I want George Hott here
submitting merge requests back doesn't make sense for kind 1 notes
what is sovereign engineering? keep seeing that term
i am the lead philosopher at nostr
rough day today,
needed a mood-boost
so I coded a simple Wikipedia proof-of-concept
👉 Wikifreedia:
https://wikifreedia.vercel.app/fiatjaf
* View what others have written about
* Edit anyone's version and make it your own (fork)
* Vote on which one is the "right" version (from your point of view)
👀 There is no canonical entry for any topic because no one is playing God (other than the woke editors of Wikipedia)
should i use the same event kind for the crowdsourced dictionary app that i am thinking about building?
also, need to add language (probably using `l` and `L` tags from the labelling NIP) to these events and long form content events
yes, yakihonne has developed a similar solution, could be used by other clients as well
pari koribo, snort r pora pariba sage