Avatar
Chad Lupkes
df06d21eca7c19c89d054964b2d9e305a425ebde34403cb0e7966a872b23058f
Wealth based systems are the future. #Bitcoin is the foundation for wealth based financial capital. Critical thinking is required. Bitcoin class of 2017.

In the geometry of Civilization, Purpose makes static structures dynamic. It applies force to the dimensions—Form, Network, Consensus—added by Evolution to the Universe's Space-Time substrate. Without Purpose, these dimensions remain latent; with it, they generate the fields where coordination unfolds. Purpose is the force that propels us from the physical to the abstract, but always within the constraints of reality's arrow: Time flows forward, consensus appends only.

These fields operate through four fundamental dynamics—the pillars that emerge when Purpose engages substrate at scale: Capital (abstract motion), Information (verified forms), Innovation (new patterns), Trust (valid constraints). At scale—where structure dominates noise—these interlock into helixes, binding Civilization.

To the author: My frustration is not saying that he was a good leader, or even a valid leader. My frustration comes from the idea that the ends do not justify the means, they make promises about future results and then do not deliver.

You did not trust Maduro, but you felt powerless. I do not trust Trump, and I feel powerless. Puede que no seamos iguales, pero existen grandes similitudes.

Buckminster Fuller once said:

“I’m not trying to predict the future.

I’m trying to understand the present well enough to know what must come next.”

I can now hear the music. And we now have more tools to be able to record it. Our civilization is polyphonic.

Purpose is the moment possibility becomes history.

Until we successfully point out that they can generate as much or more income by using wealth based sources instead.

My view on Bitcoin

nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzphcx6g0v5lqeezws2jtyktv7xpdyyh4audzq8jcw09n2su4jxpv0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6mmnw3ezuur4vghsq2rxd9hxzmnrd9skcttrv9cxjarpd3ej6am9v9k8g6pdvfshxety94jhsetdwpkxzusujr6qg

How do they define "inactivity"?

"(e.g., no logins, transactions, deposits, withdrawals, or other signs of owner engagement)"

So get your coins off exchanges, but if you have anything on an exchange, log into that exchange every few weeks or months so the clock doesn't get started.

This bill passed in October 2025. It's not new information.

I do, but I also recognize that I don't have the right or the authority to declare one viewpoint or the other as 'correct' for anyone else. The emergence theory that I am comfortable with doesn't negate the importance of emanation in the sense that Gnosticism or various schools of philosophy applied it. I do believe in deity, but not in the sense of entities on high, but through avatars that form along known and predictable patterns across multiple cultures and time periods.

Matters to whom, though.

To twist a phrase, "Not your dogma, not your meaning."

I do think the framework can be applied in either direction, and that it's less important which direction is 'correct' as long as we recognize our role in the systems. I've had thoughts that the Big Bang that began what we experience as spacetime could be an emergent level itself, and if we just change the direction it could certainly have emanated from a higher level, thus making the metaverse the next level emanant from the Universe level. I've always had the opinion that there was more to the universe than we know, or can know, I just didn't know how much of my own time I wanted to spend contemplating it, especially since we are at the crossroads of choice on which direction we want our civilization to go.

Brilliant articulation of the Right to Exit.

I would love to have a conversation about it, but it's part of a much larger framework so I don't know how ready I am to actually record a conversation about it yet. Your work on the Trust Atlas is fantastic, and aligns well with the chapter I'm building for Trust, the pillar of coordination enabling collective action.

Current framework, still evolving:

"On the canvas of Space and Time, the Universe emerges through Matter as substance, Energy as flow, Physics as rules, and Chemistry as the gateway to complexity. Consciousness bridges physical and abstract reality, generating a new dimensional substrate: Form-Network-Consensus. Upon this foundation, civilization builds the Metaverse through four systems: Capital as the velocity that transforms stock into work; Information as verification establishing what is true; Innovation as generation building what is new; Trust as coordination enabling collective action.

The Great Filter summons every civilization to a fundamental choice: build forward from verified present positions, or extract value from imagined futures. One path creates wealth through what we can prove and build; the other creates debt by borrowing legitimacy from what we hope or fear. This choice determines whether civilization can sustain itself and all life on the path to the stars."

My take on CBDCs.

nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzphcx6g0v5lqeezws2jtyktv7xpdyyh4audzq8jcw09n2su4jxpv0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcq946xsefddp5kger9dckkzunrdp5hgetrw36hyefddanz6urjdanhyctdd4skymr994kk7mn90y78fnz6

The zap is the economic incentive layer that all other social media is missing. Full adoption of zaps could completely eliminate and replace the advertising model, replacing it with the appreciation model. Such a change would mean a fundamental change in our entire global civilization, and it's the direction that we should want to go.

Maybe first fork Brave so that it works with the LIghtning Network instead of that other coin that nobody will ever use for anything.

True enough. I've seen conflicting messages on whether LN transactions are capable of being tracked like that. If they can be, then it's probably something that will be attempted. All that would do is build an underground market, and I don't think it would last forever.

Neither do I, just being honest. But I've spent decades sending ideas and requests into the void, and nothing ever comes of it. If anything was really a game changer, I know I would need to learn how to do it myself.

I found Nostr when Jack posted about it and Primal launched. I've been using social media since before the Internet came online in 1995, going back to Usenet in the 1970's and 80's. I hate the advertising model, more than almost anything else in this civilization. So seeing a social media protocol launching that uses the appreciation model instead was amazing. The user base is smaller, much more complicated. But I'm hoping that as more and more corporate controlled social media bend the knee to governments around the world, people will start seriously looking for a real alternative that will allow them to exchange information and value with no middle man. Nostr is the most important protocol since Bitcoin.

I couldn't believe it was actually him either. Whoever is behind the profile can talk a good game, but there is no evidence that it's actually the same person.

I need a copy of "Reviews of Modern Physics", Volume 51, Issue 3. Published in July 1979, there's an article I need in that volume.

Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe, by Freeman J. Dyson.

Anyone watching my feed happen to have a copy of this?