Avatar
Leo Wandersleb
46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d
https://walletscrutiny.com https://nostr.info Working on Bitcoin, Nostr and being a good dad.

Funny. So Ledger believes so much in the security of their "Ledger Recover" that they don't even run it themselves but leave that to Coincover.

What is Coincover? Well, I'm not sure. This FAQ doesn't resolve the mystery.

https://void.cat/d/8w9tVMXA5W7bLUSGat4V9w.webp

But it sounds nice, right? Very trustworthy. And totally not like a subsidiary to avert harm from the mother company.

But fret not! We are all secure! $50k of the subsidiary's funds are already earmarked for you if somebody steals your coins out of their vault and you manage to prove this wasn't done with your copy of the keys. If they find that recovery was invoked with faulty ID verification that is. If they can't find traces of recovery being invoked, they will probably just default to you having moved the funds. The wonders of shared access to private keys!

https://void.cat/d/N7uZ6K8FYSH68jNrTz7vGm.webp

The app should probably warn the user upon adding a second account and invite him to disable notifications.

It ultimately comes down to **you have to trust Ledger** which in combination with **Ledger lied** and **Ledger lost all user data** isn't such a great option.

Replying to Avatar Leo Wandersleb

https://void.cat/d/Y8MhmyM6yjVcknSpcxQBX.webp

This statement from Ledger themselves is "common knowledge" and the reason many people did prefer using hardware wallets with "secure elements" such as Ledger.

Now their latest feature revealed to many that they lied and they simply state the opposite:

https://void.cat/d/57LzPw5JLAt8tqDpxKFm5G.webp

https://void.cat/d/Y8MhmyM6yjVcknSpcxQBX.webp

This statement from Ledger themselves is "common knowledge" and the reason many people did prefer using hardware wallets with "secure elements" such as Ledger.

Now their latest feature revealed to many that they lied and they simply state the opposite:

https://void.cat/d/57LzPw5JLAt8tqDpxKFm5G.webp

This statement from Ledger themselves is "common knowledge" and the reason many people did prefer using hardware wallets with "secure elements" such as Ledger.

Now their latest feature revealed to many that they lied and they simply state the opposite.

https://t.co/qiUF4u3cNk https://t.co/o4J3LD8r9J

So do you want to achieve proof of burn committed to nostr keys? That is easy. To be a proof of burn it would have to be done by deliberately no using a full key pair but only a valid public key with no known private key. Send to "1BURN".

would have to be from the npub you want to commit to but only the first n bytes.

would be the smallest number of bytes to turn the rest into a valid Bitcoin address.

And yes, you will get much hate for this as these would be unspendable UTXOs like inscriptions. With the "1BURN" prefix you would at least tell the world it won't be needed for spends later.

So it sounds like all speakers get invited. Can somebody figure out who ends up paying for this favor? SBF certainly would have paid.

At this point I wonder: Will @Ledger Recover?

I wonder: Will Ledger Recover?

Any hackers here that would know how to best get insight into Flutter Android APKs? I tried with jadx-gui but it shows the compiled Dart code as compiled Dart code. Won't let me find strings I know must be in there.

So these messages are auto-generated a lot. Until most clients support muting these, would you mind running a thank-you bot to deliver them or a daily post thanking all of them at once? ;)

You're asking the right question.

Did nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z also blackmail you, threatening to doxx your sock puppets if you don't pay him 42 sats?

Scheme 2:

Same as scheme 1 but hide the identifier such that only the legal representatives can find the right three files to access the funds.

Problem:

* This is impossible