This is totally normal just another cointard move along nothing to see here.
nostr:note1ayeke458faz299te4m4ctksmkmyje22esc4ks3c95u6fya2p963qlx7n4r
Bitcoin fixes this?
Drink coffee while you're alive. You can abstain when you're dead.
That's the way. There isn't any reason nostr couldn't be just, say, a thin UI layer in top of IPFS, if IPFS had a usable, scalable design to begin with.
Yeah nah you can implement the protocol symmetrically and then the "client" can choose to not supply any data when queried.
This false dichotomy is absolutely throwing a spanner in the works of nostr 's decentralization efforts.
It's from the cointards jumping up and down over BTCUSD losing 5% from ATH.
So a client is a relay between relays? 😀😯🤦
The distinction of client and relay as different roles in an asymmetric communication scenario is nuts.
Decentralized systems only have one type of node: Peers. Every communication is peer-to-peer and symmetrical.
Why not start there if you want to fix things. You complain about developers having a "centralized" mindset yet your notion of a "client" absolutely implies centralization.
I somehow assumed the local relay would talk to the hosted relays so the local clients don't have to?
Hosted relays don't talk to one another normally or do they?
That would make the local relay different?
Ok so "local relay" means "DB shared amongst clients". Why not call it that way. If you want to structure your client that way ... fine ... is both "multiple clients" and "shared DB" such an important use case ... strange.
I don't understand inbox vs. outbox. Why are they different? @SimpleX does the same with sending vs. receiving server, same thing different name. Why do they have to be separate.
I'd like to make my own FIFO2 USB dongles and am thinking along the same lines.
Can't make my own chips for the time being (although https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/page/9/ and https://www.crowdsupply.com/sutajio-kosagi/precursor) so it's about doing what's possible with off-the-shelf microcontrollers.
*FIDO2
Stack sats. Not that they're going to help you but what else can someone like you do.
Debasement means prices go up. That's fine.
- Both prices for income and expenses go up in lockstep. If your expenses go up faster than your income then you have a problem with the value of your work w.r.t. to other goods and services in the market, not a problem with inflation.
- Prices go up according to a pre-determined schedule, e.g. 2% a year. The government announces that beforehand. So this can be taken into account when planning financially. When inflation is higher than expected like last year in many countries then that's a problem for planning and the economy will take a hit. We could probably do with a better government. But nothing wrong with inflation as such, I can plan with it just fine as long as they tell me beforehand.
Hey wait a second. Stoking fear in the fed is a perfectly good way to sell Bitcoin.
Your work has a price too on which planet do you live. You didn't mention how you earn money.
The vast majority wants the price of their skill and labor go down? No I don't think so.


