Avatar
xtogro
48b50e45c1a049ab5ba0eab4381f0a3b6b21d09aaaa1aea6b1e2daf27ebdd7ab
tech. transparency. entropy.

why we sleep is probably the most impactful book i’ve come across for health and performance improvement.

any non-fiction as the fifth pick on your list?

couldn’t this pow concept (awesome!) be applied generally across nostr relays/ clients to fight spammers?

sorry for the confusion. i was referring to your idea that today’s economy pushes creators to copyright their ideas. if someone decided to make their IP open (noble), the options to make a living seem limited. curious if there are alternative models (value-for-value?) that could create a win-win scenario.

thanks for the sunday mind stretching:)

> good ideas are more valuable for society the faster they spread and the cheaper they are to put into use.

that’s a great insight and a very true diagnosis. it’s also why open source is so important.

do you know concepts (besides communism) trying to solve this “noble, but hungry” dilemma?

Replying to Avatar Rune Østgård

How much do you actually know about intellectual property (IP)?

Did you know, for instance, that nobody has ever proven that IP is a net positive for society?

Logics dictate that this artificially created privilege is a net negative for humankind.

In economics terms, IP blocks many of the positive externalities that comes out of ideas.

To say it in plain language, good ideas are more valuable for society the faster they spread and the cheaper they are to put into use, but IP slows down the speed of dissemination of ideas and forces people to pay before they can use them.

As an author, I think it's extremely sad that the mechanics of society mean that I depend on copyrights.

I clearly see how it corrupts peoples' minds and hearts, just like all other political priveleges do.

Below you get a glimpse of how detrimental IP is to people living in developing countries, and how it corrupts countries once they have been industrialized.

Up until the 20th century, the U.S. government had lax enforcement of IP, particularly concerning foreign creators.

The legal framework allowed for the widespread piracy of foreign works, as the 1790 Copyright Act explicitly excluded protections for non-US authors.

This led to rampant appropriation of foreign designs and publications, with little consequence for infringers, as the government prioritized domestic interests over foreign IP rights.

Officials believed that strong IP protections would mainly benefit foreign creators, raising costs for domestic consumers and hindering local innovation.

The prevailing view was that the U.S. economy needed to develop its own capabilities through imitation before it could afford to protect foreign IP rights.

This perspective was influenced by a "frontier culture" that prioritized individualism and innovation over strict adherence to IP laws.

Calls for better protection from figures like Charles Dickens largely went unheeded, reflecting a broader culture of IP violation during this period.

The US changed its position dramatically in the 20th century, when itself became the strongest economic nation in the world.

While many developing nations, including India, Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico, resisted stringent IP standards, and argued IP favored developed countries at the expense developing countries, Uncle Sam, the former pirate protector, became the world's most aggressive enforcer of IP, pressuring developing countries with the use of trade sanctions.

I want an end to all artificial priveleges.

This first and foremost includes monetary monopolies and intellectual property rights.

Monetary monopolies centralize power and wealth.

Intellectual property legislation blocks the decentralizing effect of ideas.

Both corrupt society at high speed.

Abolishing these political instruments dramatically changes society for the better.

In the meantime, I'll just have to live with the fact that copyright is the way an author today earns his money.

But I'm not going to let it corrupt me.

how do you define IP? do you distinguish between personal creations (art, books, music) and more corporate assets (like patents or software)?

The world is being built on GitHub repositories.

nostr:npub1h6s2fyu5f08v9066ux4n8urs84mu2mngz6d5fntju9nwrfta0ywqcc3jtk

#Nostr #Web3 #Twitter #Bitcoin #blockchain #Economy #BBA #BritishBlockchain #Nostrplebs #Crypto

in foss we trust

perceived value is THE value…?

#bitcoin and real estate - what are the opportunities/ unsolved problems? (except property tokenization)

#asknostr

ux is multilayered. it’s not only about how we use things but also how we interpret them.

nostr:note1npyyvz055z3jzzy3g8llgq90lrvm7hrzm4mhjnh8h9gqwwycu28q42u50t

Replying to Avatar Neo

What nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 said in the latest Bitcoin.Review pod really reasonated with me

Something along the lines of “if you make hardware wallet UX too easy, people will not grasp the importance of self-custody”

It was using a Coldcard for the first time that I realized that this was serious business.

Make it too seamless and people won’t differentiate between self-custody and holding their wealth in an exchange wallet.

💯

usually, i use primal with its LN wallet, but testing nostur right now (with no wallet declared). zapping still work? ⚡️

#asknostr