Orange for me š that would be greatš¤Ŗ
Grok ā¦
I hear youāAppleās 30% commission and tight App Store control can feel like a chokehold, especially for platforms like Nostr that thrive on freedom and decentralization. Your frustration about it curbing the free-speech and privacy vibes you love is totally valid. Letās unpack whatās going on and explore legal avenues that could challenge Appleās grip, focusing on laws and regulations that might rein them in.
Why Appleās 30% Fee and Control Feel Like a Freedom Violation
Appleās App Store policies, including the 30% cut on in-app purchases and restrictions on alternative payment systems, create a walled garden. For Nostr, forcing the removal of zapping (tipping sats via Lightning Network) on iOS apps like Damus killed a feature that embodied financial freedom and direct peer-to-peer exchangeācore to Nostrās ethos. This control can feel like an overreach because:
⢠Privacy: Appleās rules often require apps to use its payment system, which can track transactions, clashing with Nostrās privacy-first approach.
⢠Free Speech: By controlling what apps can do (e.g., banning zaps or limiting how developers communicate payment options), Apple indirectly shapes what can be said or shared, which can stifle platforms like Nostr that prioritize unfiltered expression.
⢠Economic Freedom: The 30% fee and bans on external payment links limit how developers monetize, impacting platforms like Nostr that rely on microtransactions like zaps to foster community.
Legal Avenues to Challenge Appleās Control
Challenging Appleās dominance involves laws around antitrust, competition, and consumer rights. Here are the key legal frameworks and efforts that could force Apple to back off, based on whatās been happening:
1 Antitrust Laws (U.S.):
⦠Sherman Antitrust Act (Sections 1 and 2): This U.S. law targets monopolistic practices and restraints on trade. Epic Gamesā 2020 lawsuit against Apple argued that the App Storeās 30% fee and mandatory in-app payment system were monopolistic, hurting competition. While Epic lost on most counts, the judge ruled in 2021 that Appleās āanti-steeringā rules (banning apps from directing users to external payment methods) violated Californiaās Unfair Competition Law, forcing Apple to allow developers to link to alternative payment options.
āŖ Relevance for Nostr: This ruling could help Nostr apps like Damus inform users about zapping via external Lightning wallets, bypassing Appleās payment system. However, Apple still charges a 27% commission on external payments in some cases, so itās not a full win.
āŖ Ongoing Efforts: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is reportedly investigating Appleās App Store practices for antitrust violations. A successful DOJ case could force structural changes, like allowing third-party app stores or banning the 30% fee outright.
⦠Open App Markets Act: This bipartisan U.S. bill, supported by tech companies, aims to open iOS to third-party app stores and sideloading, reducing Appleās control. It hasnāt passed yet, but if it does, it could let Nostr apps operate outside Appleās rules, preserving features like zapping.
2 State Competition Laws:
⦠The Epic case showed Apple violated Californiaās Unfair Competition Law with anti-steering rules. Other states could pursue similar claims, arguing Appleās control over apps like Nostr stifles innovation and consumer choice. For instance, forcing Nostr to remove zaps limits how users can engage in free economic exchange, which could be framed as unfair competition.
3 International Regulations:
⦠European Unionās Digital Markets Act (DMA): The EUās DMA, effective in 2024, targets āgatekeepersā like Apple, requiring them to allow alternative app stores, sideloading, and third-party payment systems. In the EU, Apple now permits external payment links with a reduced 10-17% fee, but it still imposes payment processing fees. This could inspire Nostr apps to push for similar freedoms globally or relocate operations to the EU.
⦠South Koreaās Telecommunications Business Act: South Korea passed a law in 2021 banning app store operators from forcing exclusive payment systems. Implementation has been slow, but itās a model for challenging Appleās 30% fee.
⦠Relevance for Nostr: These laws could let Nostr apps offer zapping without Appleās cut in specific regions, preserving the platformās decentralized spirit.
4 Consumer Protection Laws:
⦠Appleās policies could be challenged under laws like the U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC has previously settled with Apple over in-app purchases, citing consumer harm. If Nostr users argue that Appleās removal of zaps deceives them about the platformās capabilities, it could spark an FTC complaint.
⦠Privacy Angle: Appleās payment system collects user data, which clashes with Nostrās privacy focus. Laws like the EUās GDPR or Californiaās CCPA could be leveraged to argue that Appleās control forces apps to compromise user privacy.
5 Class-Action Lawsuits:
⦠Developers and users could band together for a class-action suit, like the 2021 settlement where Apple created a $100 million Small Developer Assistance Fund for apps earning under $1 million annually. Nostrās community could explore a similar suit, claiming Appleās policies harm small developers and users by limiting free speech and financial freedom.
Practical Steps to Push Back
While legal battles are one route, here are actionable steps you and your friends could take to pressure Apple, keeping Nostrās free-speech and privacy ethos in mind:
⢠Raise Awareness on X and Nostr: Amplify the issue by posting about how Appleās policies hurt Nostrās zapping feature. Tag influencers or devs like @fiatjaf or @damusapp to gain traction. X posts show users are already frustratedākeep the momentum going.
⢠Support Legislative Efforts: Contact U.S. lawmakers to back the Open App Markets Act or similar bills. In the EU, push for stricter DMA enforcement. Grassroots support can tip the scales.
⢠Join Developer Advocacy Groups: Groups like the Coalition for App Fairness (backed by Epic, Spotify, and others) are fighting Appleās policies. Nostr devs could join to add a privacy/free-speech angle.
⢠Explore Workarounds: Some apps, like Netflix, avoid Appleās 30% fee by directing users to web-based payments without in-app links. Nostr apps could experiment with similar strategies, though Appleās rules are strict.
⢠Crowdfund Legal Action: Pool resources with the Nostr community to fund a lawsuit or FTC complaint, focusing on how Appleās control harms user freedom.
Challenges and Realities
⢠Appleās Legal Muscle: Appleās won most legal battles, like the Epic case, and can afford to drag out fights. Any challenge needs strong backing.
⢠Global Patchwork: Laws vary by region, so a win in the EU or South Korea might not help U.S. users.
⢠Nostrās Niche Status: As a smaller platform, Nostr might struggle to get the same attention as Fortnite or Spotify, so community noise is key.
What Law Could Keep Apple in Check?
No single law guarantees Apple will back off, but a combo of U.S. antitrust enforcement (DOJ probe, Sherman Act), state competition laws, and international regulations (DMA) offers the best shot. The Open App Markets Act, if passed, could be a game-changer by allowing sideloading and third-party stores, letting Nostr apps bypass Appleās rules entirely. For freedom-focused platforms, framing the fight around privacy and free speechālike how Appleās policies limit Nostrās decentralized visionācould rally support.
Next Steps for You
⢠Chat with Friends: Decide if you want to focus on advocacy (posting, contacting lawmakers) or explore legal routes (joining a class-action or filing complaints).
⢠Dig Deeper: Want me to research specific laws in your country or check for recent Nostr/Apple updates on X? I can also look into how other apps bypass the 30% fee legally.
⢠Stay Loud: Keep hyping Nostrās privacy and free-speech edgeāApple hates bad PR. š
Whatās your next move? You and your friends planning to stir the pot on X or maybe try a workaround for zapping? Let me know what youāre thinking!
Yes and a raspberry pie š„§
Canāt i am at work surrounded by crazy ppl drunk and drugged. I donāt feel safe at all. I need that btc thing to do itās magic š
Happy Fox happy bitcoin holder! 
Pump it up š š¶ 104k$ ath š«Ø
Hodl šš»š 
Soup š? Look good šš»
Peanut protection equipment?
Damus stop working on my MacBook Pro⦠i re-installed and still wont start #Damus
Long hours on my bicycle just appreciating nature. And my cold very cold wallet.
Here it is said! 





nostr:note1nhddpwf57fte5p8rh300fce38jtkz8swucg2m4duczxa3u34pdzs0q0472