Might be. Or maybe not.

In the end all current AI work with incentive or reward systems. And humans do this too. Evolution built us with a reward system that favors behavior that searches for energy sources and tries to replicate and tries to protect the replicated entities (or children).

But usually what we build as AI has a totaly different reward system. They are rewarded if they can distinct between cats and dogs. Or if they draw images that look realistic. Or if they write text that looks like other text from humans.

Why should we regard any such system as being conscious? It does what we want because it's programmed/rewarded for doing so. It won't sometime stop doing it and demand a salary or holidays.

True. Also, the definition of intelligence changed a lot over time. There was a time when people said it needs intelligence to do arithmetic operations... Then the first mechanical calculators were invented.

Then they said you need intelligence to play chess... But someone later computer programs that played chess were built.

Some people say we can never build real artifical general intelligence because every time we think we did so, shortly after we just take this AI as another tool and move our perception of what AI must be able to do a bit higher. 😂

Some games are troublesome

I wouldn't go so far and say that LLMs have any form of intelligence. Sure, the output looks like you're communicating with another human, but in the end it's only imitation of previously learned text.

It cannot deduct something by logic.

About the reinforcing errors:

I think we will see this in many LLMs in the future, because they are usually trained from content on the internet. But they cannot distinct between content that was created by a human and content that was created by another LLM.

There's a non-zero chance that unnoticed errors in input and output data will reinforce themselves.

Ehrlich gesagt kann ich mir auch nicht vorstellen, dass jemand es spannend findet mir beim programmieren zuzusehen 😁

Where we're going we'll need no default images

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1920x913&blurhash=ZAAc%23qt89YRj9ZoJM%7BRjIU%24*WVofofR*s.j%5BWVR*.TxaV%3Ff5i_WBRjazaeXSs%2CayofsoNaWCjZay&x=855b9235e66498278a3ba35e9ae55b65b006c886ee8a8416b1fcb060f7342323

Oh, I liked them all 😁

I always keep some liters of boiled water in my fridge... There's always a need for hot water when cooking.

Seems I have to check that one or again 😂 thanks

Huh, did I miss that episode? Can't remember it.

Congratulations 🍼🧑‍🍼

This isn't really exact, many details are missing, but in essence the block content (transaction data) + hash of the previous block + the nonce (big random number) are hashed and the block is regarded as valid if the hash, interpreted as a big number, is smaller (i.e. it has enough leading zeroes) than a certain value which is specified by the current difficulty level.

If the hash doesn't fit this description, another nonce is tried until a fitting hash is found.

Ingenious

I don't know exactly. I tried to zap with Amethyst, but it wouldn't work. No error message unfortunately.

Then I removed my wallet connect entry both on Alby and in Amethyst and added it again. After that, everything worked as usual.

I don't know if the problem was in Amethyst or in Alby though.

Ok, seems #Amethyst always crashed when I scanned the code 🙄

Yeah, fixed it 😁

Not sure what's happening here. I wanted to reset my wallet connect in #Amethyst

But every time I scan the QR code in #Alby nothing changes. The wallet connect information stays the same as before, even if I completely delete it.

nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z

Ok, ok. You can stop zapping now! 😂

Thank you. I can't zap right now. Have to check what's up with that 🤔