I found this post with the nostr algorithm, so I made a job listing for anyone who can donate time to the project:
isn't the threat very minimal with hashed addresses where the address is only revealed to spend?
vote for the number to go up ๐งก
vote for better money this November
this is simply deplorable
I'm happy to see Gordon Brander, a long-time "decentralized brain" buidler to finally arrive at Nostr. https://newsletter.squishy.computer/p/natures-many-attempts-to-evolve-a
thanks for sharing!
Michael Saylor Pledges to Donate Bitcoin Wealth to Humanity
๐๐๐
https://cryptonews.com/news/michael-saylor-pledges-to-donate-bitcoin-wealth-to-humanity/
too bad Michael Saylor doesn't own any bitcoin
amen! I've been telling people this for a while: Microstrategy doesn't hold any bitcoin.
very belated GM. will there be a Shenandoah Bitcoin Club brunch in December?
sorry, there was a misunderstanding. I air replied to myself ๐
I was referring to the bot army that was promoting Jack's note about Apple products
The reason why algos can't see that conversation, is because the OP doesn't contain the signal, the thread does.
In fact, social media algos _actively discourage_ human interaction. That's why influencers quickly learn to game the system by refusing to respond. If they respond to someone, and that person responds to them, the discussion thereafter is "invisible" to the algos. All of the responses have to "hang" on the OP.
nostr:npub1utx00neqgqln72j22kej3ux7803c2k986henvvha4thuwfkper4s7r50e8 nostr:npub1fd0t73r8vn3nqezdg93fyj5x5u79zucf3jaspkc2dy9sjuqx5z8qftjal4 nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf
I personally don't care for nested conversations, but the nostr algorithm can be taylored for your use case
The reason why algos can't see that conversation, is because the OP doesn't contain the signal, the thread does.
In fact, social media algos _actively discourage_ human interaction. That's why influencers quickly learn to game the system by refusing to respond. If they respond to someone, and that person responds to them, the discussion thereafter is "invisible" to the algos. All of the responses have to "hang" on the OP.
nostr:npub1utx00neqgqln72j22kej3ux7803c2k986henvvha4thuwfkper4s7r50e8 nostr:npub1fd0t73r8vn3nqezdg93fyj5x5u79zucf3jaspkc2dy9sjuqx5z8qftjal4 nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf
it's been a while since I've looked at the NIPs, but I believe all replies mention the root, so that activity will all acrue to the ranking of the root post and it will bubble up
The reason why algos can't see that conversation, is because the OP doesn't contain the signal, the thread does.
In fact, social media algos _actively discourage_ human interaction. That's why influencers quickly learn to game the system by refusing to respond. If they respond to someone, and that person responds to them, the discussion thereafter is "invisible" to the algos. All of the responses have to "hang" on the OP.
nostr:npub1utx00neqgqln72j22kej3ux7803c2k986henvvha4thuwfkper4s7r50e8 nostr:npub1fd0t73r8vn3nqezdg93fyj5x5u79zucf3jaspkc2dy9sjuqx5z8qftjal4 nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf
I'll provide a parameter to weight mentions in a kind 1 higher than reposts and reactions. I don't even account for zaps at all