Avatar
shinohai
4bc7982c4ee4078b2ada5340ae673f18d3b6a664b1f97e8d6799e6074cb5c39d
E Crypto Libertas | PGP: 0x260FA57BCE677A5C04BF60BA4A75883CC1B1D34C

The irony of `X` not paying the city of San Fran for their sign's blue check: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-flashing-x-headquarters-san-francisco-without-a-permit/

Why would one *want* to censor them? Zap them instead.

SEXICANS > HEXICANS

Now that Richard Shart is being sued, wonder if he will pull a Erik Voorhees and go hide down in Hexico ? πŸ€”

This would imply there is something inherently wrong or immoral with being a sex worker, or that all egirls are dumb bimbos.

Most complaints from folks that see the nudity and judge the #egirl on that, instead of the sum of their parts as a whole. Many of the girls far more adept and technical than average screeching monkey on Bitcoin twitter.

'tis easier to clutch pearls and whine about pr0n and such instead of learning how the protocol works and curating one's feed.

I have read the holepunch stack, and even cobbled together a little NAT driller using it: https://github.com/Shinoa-Fores/hypernat. Holepunch is pretty nice all in all. Re: Keet's binary being "honest" - I can also release *parts* of the code powering something, but end-user has no guarantee there ain't a keylogger or I'm shoving metadata through a firehose back to myself. In this sense, keet is no better than zoom, skype, et all.

WOT fixes this.

nostr:note10atpucgp4thr8azuxqj0ws64qw0rqx32r67y9v8a5mwzrzqjzxnqkgqkse

"Hurry up and fill this bitch's pants with okra, we're due at the squash vendor's stall at 5."

nostr:note1wfpyv3jvsuldcedz4cslxyu8agvngetlspa6a68mamnfa8zx82rqklk9vx

Keet is closed-source and works on the "just trust that this binary we hand you works like we say it does!" model, whereas I can go and read simplex code on github and know exactly what it does.

It bears repeating - "Any program which does not make its source code available is potential spyware", i.e. there *is* no comparison.

The only people dumb enough to believe he *wasn't* a malicious actor are the Bitcoin twitter cock-gobblers that moo about anything with the word "BTC" stamped on it.