Avatar
Haha
4f2118e124779291eef71a4fbdfc3458e5709d8efcdb941bf54ce2094e987729
Hello , world !😃

“不打算出售用户生物识别数据”,言下之意就是,有能力出售,但目前暂时不打算出售,以后改变主意了也可以出售用户的生物识别数据。🙄

前16里,美帝只把两个视为威胁吧?待收拾完第11,后面就该专心对付第二了?🤔

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

“We should change Bitcoin now in a contentious way to fix the security budget” is basically the same tinkering mentality that central bankers have.

It begins with an overconfident assumption that they know fees won’t be sufficient in the future and that a certain “fix” is going to generate more fees. But some “fixes” could even backfire and create less fees, or introduce bugs, or damage the incentive structure.

The Bitcoin fee market a couple decades out will primarily be a function of adoption or lack thereof. In a world of eight billion people, only a couple hundred million can do an on chain transaction per year, or a bit more with maximal batching. The number of people who could do a monthly transaction is 1/12th of that number. In order to be concerned that bitcoin fees will be too low to prevent censorship in the future, we have to start with the assumption that not many people use bitcoin decades out.

Fedwire has about 100x the gross volume that Bitcoin currently does, with a similar number of transactions. What will Bitcoin’s fee market be if volumes go up 5x or 10x, let alone 50x or 100x? Who wants to raise their hand with a confident model of what bitcoin volumes will be in 2040?

What will someone pay to send a ten million dollar equivalent on chain settlement internationally? $100 in fees per million dollar settlement transaction would be .01%. $300 to get it in a quicker block would be 0.03%. That type of environment can generate tens of billions of dollars of fees annually. The fees that people pay to ship millions of dollars of gold long distances, or to perform a real estate transaction worth millions of dollars, are extremely high. Even if bitcoin is a fraction of that, it would be high by today’s standards. And in a world of billions of people, if nobody wants to pay $100 to send a million dollar settlement bearer asset transaction, then that’s a world where not many people use bitcoin period.

In some months the “security budget” concern trends. In other months, the “fees will be so high that only rich people can transact on chain” concern trends. These are so wildly contradictory and the fact that both are common concerns shows how little we know about the long term future.

I don’t think the fee market can be fixed by gimmicks. Either the network is desirable to use in a couple decades or it’s not. If 3 or 4 decades into bitcoin’s life it can’t generate significant settlement volumes, and gets easily censored due to low fees, then it’s just not a very desirable network at that point for one reason or another.

Some soft forks like covenants can be thoughtfully considered for scaling and fee density, and it’s good for smart developers to always be thinking about low risk improvements to the network that the node network and miners might have a high consensus positive view toward over time. But trying to rush VC-backed softforks, and using security budget FUD to push them, is pretty disingenuous imo.

Anyway, good morning.

🤔

Little known fact about https://nostr.build. We update and deploy improvements and bugfixes almost daily, but 99% of the work is done in the core and is invisible to user. If you want to keep track of changes, you can always look at the changelog in the repository https://github.com/nostrbuild/nostr.build

Many hours are spent to ensure scalability, reliability, performance and sustainability, so you can have your images, gifs and videos always delivered as fast as possible and reliably. 🐶🐾🫡🫂

Meme on!

👍👍👍👍

这篇文章提到:“Hal Finny在2010年认为,比特币自身无法扩展到,未来每个人每一笔金融交易都进区块。他认为以比特币为储备(可以是部分储备,也可以是100%储备)的银行将解决这些问题。比特币的最终命运,是成为一种可作为银行储备货币的 “高能货币”。大多数比特币交易会在银行间发生,也即结算净 流入/流出。”

Hal Finny发表此观点是2010年,那时候还没闪电网络呢。闪电网络后来的诞生,会不会带来另一种命运?🤔🤔🤔🤔

紫水晶客户端里显示了你的文章链接,选择用网页浏览器打开,提示“发生了一个错误”,然后回到yakihonne网站首页。再试一次,一样。

打开梯子,试一试,这次网页浏览器就能正常打开了,内容是学习日语的第一天,10条。😅

幸亏我读的书不少,不然就被胡专家的说法给骗了。😅

降印花税其实作用不大,也就是个象征意义,毕竟中国烟草涨价10%就都收回来了。限制大股东减持才是A股真正利好。😅

咱也不知道,咱也不敢问?😂

这么大的成果,这么大的善举,如此低调,咋没上微博热搜啊?😂