Avatar
Zee
4fcac27adafd553c650be233ceb0f560abfa6a01974cd968d7bb36e2a47e8c1f
Bitcoin pleb. NodeJS API developer based in Colombia🇨🇴 ⚡Full Lightning Node runner Feel free to open a channel to my LN node.⚡

No language is worthless. It depends on what you want to build.

The language is a tool. There are very specialized languages that only do 1 thing but they do it very well.

For example kobol is an old language that most devs don't bother to learn because it is currently only used to maintain old/legacy infrastructure. As a result people that took the time to learn it and can currently use it can get very well paying jobs maintaining said infrastructure and cannot be fired because there is no competition

Without. If there was a seed it'd have a shadow

Cuando alguien que cree en papelitos con valor imaginario dice que #bitcoin no existe 🤣🤣🤣

#hispano

Agencies will not hunt down devs of projects that don't give true anonymity or that can be deanonymized giving their users only the illusion of anonymity.

They probably already have ways to deanonymize Tor and Bitcoin users. So no need to hunt those devs down.

La historia de que sí recibiste lo que te vas a gastar.

Así se aseguran los nodos de que si tienes el balance suficiente para realizar la transacción. Es la razón de por qué se guarda toda la historia de transacciones se revisa que los recibiste y que el que te los pago los recibió y así hasta que fueron minadas

I sometimes wonder how much energy is "wasted" by having automatic escalators turned on while there's nobody on them

Está bien. No todas se prestan para el proceso.

?cid=6c09b952ayhwie5u4nxuarj6c1xa8csjvaymdk4buywg5mxz&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

I can see it being useful if someone fulfills the following criteria.

1. stacks through LN which is becoming more and more common with P2P tools like robosats and Lnp2pbot as governments clamp down on on-ramps.

2. Doesn't have their own LN channels or the ones they have are too small.

3. The fees on the bitcoin main chain are high.

If the 3 above are true then they can use it to offload custodial LN sats while they build up a large enough UTXO where it makes sense to transact on the main bitcoin chain.

Funny enough this exact scenario happened to me last year when fees went over 500s/vb and my channels got remotely force closed at the same time forcing me to use custodial LN to stack. Then liquid to accumulate a few million sat UTXOs before transferring to cold storage.

It would also be useful for someone that's only getting started stacking and doesn't want to KYC themselves so they go straight to these p2p tools using custodial LN wallets. These people won't be buying millions of sats per transaction. So they might want to offload some of the sats in their custodial wallets to something else before they can do an On chain transaction.

#meme #bitcoin

It's a good idea. just that the translation, though, not technically wrong, it's phrased weird. Imo it should look like this:

"ADVERTENCIA! La inflación está robando tus ahorros. Opta por no participar ahorrando en bitcoin. Dinero que no tiene inflación."

Also the QR takes me to an site that's written in english. So the person still needs to know English to interact.

With a fixed supply the only way NGU stops is if adoption stops or is reversed.

I understand this is a very unlikely scenario when there are no alternatives to bitcoin.

I'm just saying that In that scenario bitcoin becomes less and less decentralized and secure over time. With less and less users over time it will just roll over and die.

So in a way NGU is a measure of interest in using and holding bitcoin and by proxy the health of the network.