Only 7.07% left to mine
nostr:note1qqq3e0nvvw94xa30fkkt59nqc4s3vvzdhg47s9r7hujcrte77qaqu8x6ts
Tic tic … 💥 note1qqq3f4e88zqkkg5h49s4ncxt5aq2gwz9sves274f5q5n3mmqs63qnrur38
Lovely way of saying it!
When the average boomer age is 84, you will have your 4th turning
Sold some #btc to pay a bill - let’s hope it’s not a pizza moment - must work harder
Only joking, this conversation has definitely made me rethink the simple repost or even quote 👍
A much watch!!! Follow TFTC and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy on Rumble
https://rumble.com/v3kqxus-448-opt-out-of-keynesian-brainrot-with-godfrey-bloom.html
If you haven’t seen him go for it in the EU parliament- be sure to have a little search
Lol 😆 nostr:note1hnad8aqd6lxzgf32upccap9d935du6sdqmyea7jk2lc92zfukeasx6gupx
I think we need different types of "follow". What about something like this:
1. Friend — this person doesn't show up in my feed. But I like them, and want to keep track of them, and maybe be reminded of them on occasion (hey hodlbod, here's what your friend X has been up to this summer). I trust them, and want to factor their opinions in to content recommendations generated for me.
2. Follow — I want to know what this person says if it has engagement, is popular, or matches some other filter, like topics I've expressed interest in. The Hacker News bot might fit in this category.
3. Super Follow — I want to see everything this person says. These are the people on my "pure signal" list currently.
4. Subscribe — these are people you don't care about, and whose opinions you don't care about per se, but are people who get paid (either by you or by advertisers) to recommend content or products. Could be bots or influencers. You'd never see their content, but you would see things recommended by them.
Items #2 and #3 are variants of the same thing, and could be conflated by assigning a decimal value to your follow (suggested by nostr:nprofile1qqsfcts2suzpxaeuhy2mnjwd9cwt69l98t3tp2r2hf09hu8uz0zzp5spzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmnyuurtjm earlier, but I used to have something like this in Coracle).
The first category is entirely different though, because the value of the relationship is not based on what they say, but who they are. I honestly don't want to see anything my mom posts to social media unless she tags me in it (in which case she'll email me). But she's one of the most important people in my life.
Likewise the final category. This is an entirely transactional-type relationship, and is exploited to provide additional social signal to otherwise neutral content.
So, any other categories? This is really quite similar to nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7anfw3hhytnwdaehgu339e3k7mgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsxp7af9 's "relationship status" nip, but with more ability to quantify what clients can do based on the relationship. It could also be implemented (of course) using NIP 32.
I guess if you really wanted this, you could spin up 4 npubs
👀 nostr:note1yak6x3u8nq85s6uk4jjwdx4mseq2a227m8f6zeyqj98z7glpsjmszhj59d
Wow, congrats on getting to 800 👌
When you burn the crop, you’re unable to harvest - expect a slow burn 🔥
👀 nostr:note1gpalye2xm3ayfhka06ayljd26wvf68dh2ztg2yg733augy2va5ksqwv88c
Lol, so done with crypto - #studybitcoin
Wow nostr:note1d8rtch3fzaw622y9muevgus3uq79mc7753a2q54m53l99mmp77ksjpmj4x
