And there are some things that can never be mistakes
I prefer self-hosting Git. Those options are more mature than most Nostr options, and with federation being implemented in Forgejo (which is a perfect use case for federated protocols) I see that it is the best option.
I am considering implementing Nostr sign-in as an external IdP if the need arises.
You do not need to be that to understand that having a device that has a weak chip is a bad idea
No. You can already do that without an attack if you use resident keys. (aka passkeys *without* a username)
This only means that someone with your PIN and extended access can clone it.
The vulnerability doesnāt make sense though.
Sure, someone can clone your YubiKey.
But they can also just tap to log into any website they want without cloning it if they stole it.
you could do access control
That was what I was trying to say. Could be interesting to have one.
The problem is I do not have a Bitaxe. š
Before overclocking https://nostpic.com/media/fd0266485777bd73e97c7c37f520c83c82e362fe4c25a6be93f3380083d4646b/a9fd106f3f1f3e26010612c9040379a55abf74cbbf2dc1b3c8eb29042a103375.webp
After overclocking
Mind you this is the Bitaxe Gamma with stock fan and heatsink, but this stand has a little secret.
I cranked up the frequency and core voltage to values which would make it overheat in a matter of seconds in a regular stand. See for yourself.
I'm curious to see how far I can take this, more testing is needed. This is exciting because it might be the inexpensive overclocking solution we've all been waiting for.
Automated tuning software? š
You are not defending your trademark, but using it to take down a project which had done what you did in a way that is more affordable and gave more control to users.
It is a shame that Coinkite engages in this behavior and harms the Bitcoin and open source ecosystem, the same ecosystem it profits off of, with one example being the starting point of the Coldcard.
It is difficult to see any good faith actions here.
The name BTClock is highly unlikely to be confused with Blockclock. You can only lose a trademark if there is obvious infringement happening and you do nothing.
Should Satochip go after you and your trademark because you made Satschip, which has the actual potential of confusing users? nostr:note1lu2v6y623mgx0xh35jx0tg6euqgqg3xxuy92vdttkfgcgg4nwkmsnhc4u5
Discovery on Nostr is not a bad idea, though.
And identity. It would solve having to create an account for each instance.
noticed your follow list got wiped
restore it at https://hist.nostr.land :)
Mostlyā¦ self hosting also works and in the case of Git, I do not see any benefit for Nostr over self hosting as most projects have centralized leadership
If someone pretends they are affiliated with your product for example when they are not, for example.
Or when someone tries to use your branding for their own product that you donāt endorse.
