Avatar
semisol
52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd
👨‍💻 software developer 🔒 secure element firmware dev 📨 nostr.land relay all opinions are my own.

AI is in the end a glorified next-word prediction function.

When you try to optimize this in a way that usually results in reasoning, the path it takes is still biased by the base model

unpopular opinion low-value payments should be discouraged because they pay less fees while having more risk (bigger payments go through more reliable routes) and taking up the same amount of resources (DB updates, HTLC slots)

let’s not talk about the biases nostr:note16hmxsg623r54tq8lujytf49d28u9k67xwaegms467c0z5udnjjxs46zts2

and pay several sats in fees for it because fuck you nostr:note1wt5x6e5u0hnqxsqmcuksfm8d3c4dwfkcsaw0mpc8zw2e33hluu9qwqqqrc

depends on if the software is the product nostr:note16qzam8km0tlqfaxr423yuq40percz0zw0fjvg27ksngsmm89uvgs6eljtd

I heard there is a special place for those people in hell where they stand in queues with no gaps

you do not get insane speeds like consumer drives (not bad speeds, though!), because that comes at a huge cost

costs of going faster scale exponentially

there is, but the lifetime is 10x+

enterprise drives are better optimized for thermals, but the best form factor is U.2 and similar

SATA-like form factor, but with PCIe

Yeah. How it works is that unlike the crappy ATECC/DS SEs they use, it has protections against a lot of attacks. Both of them cost <$1.

1. Overpriced products

2. Non-stop FUD about competitors, and FOSS specifically

3. Had multiple vulnerabilities in their SE, they did not disclose it, still using same flawed series of products

4. False advertising claims

5. 33% of the OpenSats board has monetary interest in CK even though #2

Content addressable memory

okay but when are we going to start shaming the media hosts that host universally questionable content nostr:note1m7dfpsyxn4f2y8ta6dl3zujtuwdwqyjefe7m35zs8a8c9cy6ep6qlyt79s