Avatar
semisol
52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd
👨‍💻 software developer 🔒 secure element firmware dev 📨 nostr.land relay all opinions are my own.

Yeah, it is possible

Initially a USB stick or something though is more useful

Operations have to be done on device

Okay good Nostr signing is included as an alternative configuration instead of a BIP-32 wallet (by extension BIP-39)

Did you already fill out the HWW testing form

Samples have arrived

Already in the works đź‘€

No crappy ESP32 that can be dumped, or weak SEs

DM for more info (no gift wraps) nostr:note1xr3ht62hxcxkchtgzf2a9q0e9f6rtt47cw8z4s7vrwnz975cr8esh3qnrj

“The most transparent”, says OpenSats, which does not disclose 33% (or more) of the board has economic ties to VC funds and companies with interests against Bitcoin

or their grant selection process

Replying to Avatar Leo Wandersleb

nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f $1M/month in funding is a huge win for Bitcoin & OpenSource! But the community needs more clarity.

https://opensats.org/transparency

is a start, but lacks specific grant amounts. We see ~50 recipients. Is the average grant ~$20k/month?

My @WalletScrutiny application (and others) received no response.

nostr:npub1ej493cmun8y9h3082spg5uvt63jgtewneve526g7e2urca2afrxqm3ndrm's situation

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpn92tr3hexwgt0z7w4qz3fcch4ryshja8jeng453aj4c83646jxvqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqrf5frvx86d6n99d6sntjsxenjrmgzpm4qht7hzersyx6h87dzryqmyxhuk

also raises questions but he at least got a rejection.

Given OpenSats' influence, greater transparency is crucial for trust.

A significant part of their donations go to people affiliated with their own VC funds and what they invested in, or help advance the goals of those organizations